Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12th Nov 2018 - 13th Nov 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
cis-N-hydroxy-3-[methyl(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino]cyclobutanecarboxamide
EC Number:
951-622-2
Molecular formula:
C12H15N5O2
IUPAC Name:
cis-N-hydroxy-3-[methyl(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino]cyclobutanecarboxamide

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
ince no workable suspension of PF-07085579 in physiological saline could be obtained, the test item was used as delivered by the sponsor and added pure on top of the corneas
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 ± 10 minutes
at 32 ± 1°C.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Mean Opacity
Value:
ca. -2.1
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
other: Mean Permeability
Run / experiment:
Mean Permeability
Value:
ca. 0.069
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Mean in vitro irritation score
Value:
ca. -1.1
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on
the corneas. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (20% (w/v) Imidazole) was 140 and within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and
that the test system functioned properly. PF-07085579 did not induce ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of -1.1 after 240 minutes of treatment.
In conclusion, since PF-07085579 induced an IVIS ≤ 3, no classification is required for eye irritation or serious eye damage.
Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the eye hazard potential of  PF-07085579 as measured by its ability to induce opacity and increase permeability in an isolated bovine

cornea using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test (BCOP test). This report describes the potency of chemicals to induce serious eye damage using isolated

bovine corneas. The eye damage of  PF-07085579 was tested through topical application for approximately 240 minutes.

The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD guideline. Batch GR13449 of  PF-07085579 was a white solid with a purity of 100%. Since no workable

suspension in physiological saline could be obtained, the test item was used as delivered and added pure on top of the corneas.

The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on

the corneas. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (20% (w/v) Imidazole) was 140 and within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean. It

was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly.

PF-07085579 did not induce ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of -1.1 after 4 hours of treatment.

In conclusion, since  PF-07085579 induced an IVIS ≤ 3, no classification is required for eye irritation or serious eye damage.