Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline study (OECD 117) in compliance with GLP.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Fraunhofer
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
1.89
Temp.:
30 °C
Remarks on result:
other: 5-Methyl-oxazolidine as reaction product of MBO determined.
Conclusions:
The partition coefficient between n-octanol and water determined according to OECD guideline 117 resulted in a value of 1.89 based on 5-methyl-oxazolidine.
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
Experimental start: 2001-12-26; Experimental termination: 2001-12-28
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline study (EU A.8) in compliance with GLP.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Jai Research Foundation
Type of method:
shake-flask method to: flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-0.225
Remarks on result:
other: Based on formaldehyde. Total formaldehyde determined after derivatisation with hydroxylammonium chloride.
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-0.552
Remarks on result:
other: Based on Isopropanolamine (IPA). Total IPA determined potentiometrically.
Details on results:
temperature: no data
pH: no data
Conclusions:
The partition coefficient between n-octanol and water of the reaction product determined according to EU method A.8 resulted in values of -0.23 based on formaldehyde analysis and -0.55 based on analysis of 2-hydroxypropylamine.
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
Experimental start: 2001-05-30; Experimental termination: 2001-06-01
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline study (EU A.8) in compliance with GLP.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Jai Research Foundation
Type of method:
shake-flask method to: flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-0.043
Remarks on result:
other: Total formaldehyde determined after derivatisation with hydroxylammonium chloride; total HPA determined potentiometrically. Result based on the sum of FA and HPA
Details on results:
result: -0.043 (mean)
n-octanol/water 1:1:
-0.075
temperature: no data
pH: no data

n-octanol/water 1:2:
-0.210
n-octanol/water 2:1:
0.156
Conclusions:
The partition coefficient between n-octanol and water of the reaction product determined according to EU method A.8 resulted in a value of -0. 043 based on the nominal concentration of the substance.

Description of key information

The reaction product was tested three times for the partition coefficient between n-octanol and water with different modifications of the test protocol. The study of Schülke & Mayr (2001) according to EU method A.8 resulted in a value of -0. 043 based on the nominal concentration of the active substance. The study of Schülke & Mayr (2002) according to EU method A.8 resulted in values of -0.23 based on formaldehyde analysis and -0.55 based on analysis of 2-hydroxypropylamine. The study of Bode according to OECD guideline 117 resulted in a value of 1.89 based on 5-methyl-oxazolidine.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
-0.043

Additional information

In both studies of Schülke & Mayr according to EC method A.8 the standard test procedure was modified and modifications differ between the performed tests. In both studies the partition coefficient was determined only in the water phase via measurement of the degradation products of the substance. The content in the n-octanol phase was calculated by subtraction of the water-phase content from the total content. In the first study a log POWvalue of -0.043 was determined based on the nominal concentration of the substance. The stock solution of the test substance was prepared in n-octanol. The second study exhibited a log POWvalue of -0.23 based on formaldehyde analysis and -0.55 via analysis of 2-hydroxypropylamine. For this second test the stock solution of the test substance was prepared in water and the contents of formaldehyde and 2-hydroxypropylamine were determined. For the exposure calculations a log POW of -0.043 is used as a worst case. The third study was performed according to OECD 117. Due to the instability of the substance, the hydrolysis product 5-methyl-oxazolidine was chosen as the analytical target and measured by HPLC. The log POWvalue for the latter compound was determined as 1.89. The estimated value of the main constituent 3,3’-methylene-bis(5-methyl-oxazolidine) can be assumed to be lower than the value detected for the degradation product as the calculated log POW for the test substance is lower (-0.58) than the calculated value for 5-methyl-oxazolidine (-0.08).