Hydrogen tetrakis[2,2-bis[(allyloxy)methyl]butan-1-olato-O1]bis(ditridecyl phosphito -O'')titanate(2-)

Skin sensitisation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

20 Feb - 28 Mar 2018

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2018

Report date:

2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 442B (Skin Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay: BrdU-ELISA)

Version / remarks:

adopted 22 Jul 2010

Deviations:

yes

Remarks:

no data on cellular proliferation provided (BrdU incorporation)

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)

GLP compliance:

yes

Type of study:

mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Hydrogen tetrakis[2,2-bis[(allyloxy)methyl]butan-1-olato-O1]bis(ditridecyl phosphito -O'')titanate(2-)

EC Number:

264-709-9

EC Name:

Hydrogen tetrakis[2,2-bis[(allyloxy)methyl]butan-1-olato-O1]bis(ditridecyl phosphito -O'')titanate(2-)

Cas Number:

64157-14-8

Molecular formula:

not applicable (UVCB substance)

IUPAC Name:

dihydrogen 2-{[(di{[bis(tridecyloxy)phosphanyl]oxido}tris({2,2-bis[(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)methyl]butyl}oxido)titaniotetrakis(ylium))oxido]methyl}-1-(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)-2-[(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)methyl]butane

Specific details on test material used for the study:

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature and humidity

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:

mouse

Strain:

CBA:J

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA)
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Weight at study initiation: 18.2 – 25.3 g
- Housing: individually in suspended wire-bottom cages
- Diet: PMI Rodent Chow Diet No. 5001, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days
- Indication of any skin lesions: no

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature and humidity were continuously monitored
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:

other: Dimethylacetaminde:Acetone:Ethanol 4:3:3; DaAE

Concentration:

Preliminary dermal irritation screen: 5, 10 and 25% (v/v)
Main study: 5, 10 and 25% (v/v)

No. of animals per dose:

2 (preliminary dermal irritation screen), 5 (main study)

Details on study design:

PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
- Compound solubility: The test item was found to be soluble in acetone:olive oil 4:1 (AOO) at a concentration of 50%, dimethylacetaminde:acetone:ethanol 4:3:3 (DaAE), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). DaAE was chosen as vehicle for the study.
- Systemic toxicity: The animals appeared normal on Day 1 up to Day 6.
- Ear thickness as measure for dermal irritation: No increase in ear thickness of 25% or more at test item concentrations of 5, 10 and 25% (v/v) was noted on Day 1, 3 and 6 and thus, the test substance was not considered irritating at these concentrations.
- Erythema scores: Test item concentrations of 10% (v/v) revealed a mean erythema score of 0.3 on Day 4 and Day 5. 25% (v/v) of the test item resulted in mean erythema scores of 1.0 (Days 3 and 4), 0.8 (Day 5) and 0.5 (Day 6).

MAIN STUDY
Based on the screen results, test substance concentrations of 5, 10 and 25% (v/v) were chosen for the main study.

ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: Local lymph node assay BrdU ELISA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: The test substance is considered to have a positive response if treatment results in a 1.6-fold or greater increase in the mean LNC proliferation (BrdU ELISA OD values) relative to that obtained for the vehicle control. Therefore, the test substance was considered as sensitizer if a SI value of 1.6 or more was achieved.

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
The test item at concentrations of 5, 10 and 25% (v/v) in DaAE was topically applied to the dorsum of each ear once daily for three consecutive days. The test substance was spread over the entire dorsal surface of each ear using a micropipette to deliver 25 µL/ear. Both ears were observed daily for erythema and scored. On Days 1, 3 and 6 ear thickness measurements were performed. On Day 5 of the main test approximately 96 h following the initial dose and 24 h prior to euthanasia, 500 µL of a 10 mg/mL concentrated BrdU solution in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) was intraperitoneally injected into the mice. On Day 6, each mouse was euthanized using CO2 asphyxiation, and the jugular vein was opened for complete exsanguination. Gross observations of the auricular lymph nodes were made and the lymph nodes were collected. The auricular lymph nodes were combined for each animal and single-cell suspensions were prepared in RPMI-10 medium. BrdU incorporation was detected with a BrdU-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit. An aliquot of 100 µL of the lymph node cell (LNC) suspension preparation was added to the wells of a flat-bottom microplate in triplicate. After fixation and denaturation of the LNC, anti-BrdU antibody was added to each well and allowed to bind. Excess unbound anti-BrdU antibody solution was then removed by washing and the substrate solution was added and allowed to generate chromogen. The absorbance of each well was measured using a MicroQuant plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments) at 370 nm with a reference wavelength of 492 nm.

Positive control substance(s):

hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Statistics:

For each dose group, the individual animal SI values along with the mean group SI and standard deviation were calculated, and ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test was performed to statistically compare each test article dose group to the vehicle control group. Although specified in the test guidelines, these calculations and results were not incorporated into the interpretation of the data. An SI value of 1.6 or more is the sole determinant for a positive sensitization response.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:

A 25% solution of HCA (v/v) in dimethylacetamide : acetone : ethanol (4:3:3) yielded a SI value of 3.4 ± 0.7. The 25% HCA positive control produced no more than very slight erythema. Ear thickness on Day 6 increased greater than 25% and enlargement of the lymph nodes were observed, which is consistent with historical results in the literature.

In vivo (LLNA)

Results

Results 1

Parameter:

SI

Value:

1.8

Variability:

± 0.6

Test group / Remarks:

5% (v/v)

Results 2

Parameter:

SI

Value:

2.1

Variability:

± 0.4

Test group / Remarks:

10% (v/v)

Results 3

Parameter:

SI

Value:

2.2

Variability:

± 0.6

Test group / Remarks:

25% (v/v)

Results 4

Parameter:

other: EC 1.6

Value:

3.8

Cellular proliferation data / Observations:

DETAILS ON STIMULATION INDEX CALCULATION
Calculation of the Stimulation Index (SI) per animal:
SI = Mean OD test article / Mean OD vehicle
 
Calculation of the EC1.6:
EC1.6 = c + (1.6-d) / (b-d) x (a-c)
 
a: test article concentration at SI value “b”
b: SI value nearest to but greater than 1.6
c: test article concentration at SI value “d”
d: SI value nearest to but less than 1.6
 
When no treatment produces an SI value less than 1.6, the concentration at which SI = 1.6 (EC1.6) was estimated from the lowest positive (SI ≥ 1.6) test article concentration and the vehicle (i.e. 0% test article) according to the following formular:
 
EC1.6 = c + (1.6-d) / (b-d) x (a-c)
 
a: test article concentration at SI value “b”
b: SI value nearest to but greater than 1.6
c: 0% test article (vehicle only) i.e. concentration at SI value “d”
d: SI value of vehicle control = 1.0

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS:
Mortality or signs of systemic toxicity were not observed in all treatment groups or in the control groups.

ERYTHEMA AND EAR THICKNESS: Erythema was observed at all test substance concentrations (refer to Table 1). A greater than 25% increase in ear thickness on Day 6 was not measured in animals treated with the test substance (refer to Table 2).

BODY WEIGHTS:
Body weight losses were noted but were not considered significant (less than 2 grams)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Ear thickness (Mean over 5 animals)

	Mean Ear Thickness (mm)			Change (%)
Treatment	Pre- dosing (Day 1)	48 Hr (Day 3)	End In-Life (Day 6)	Day 3 – Day 1	Day 6 – Day 1
DaAE (Vehicle Control)	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.00%	0.00%
25% HCA (Positive Control)	0.18	0.23	0.25	27.8%a	38.9%a
5% (v/v)	0.19	0.19	0.19	0.00%	0.00%
10% (v/v)	0.18	0.19	0.21	5.60%	16.70%
25% (v/v)	0.18	0.2	0.22	11.10%	22.20%

DaAE: Dimethylacetaminde:Acetone:Ethanol 4:3:3, solvent control

HCA: hexyl cinnamic aldehyde, positive control

Table 2: Erythema score

Treatment	Animal I.D	Day 1		Day 2		Day 3		Day 4		Day 5		Day 6
		Left Ear	Right Ear	Left Ear	Right Ear	Left Ear	Right Ear	Left Ear	Right Ear	Left Ear	Right Ear	Left Ear	Right Ear
DaAE (Vehicle Control)	19	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	20	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	21	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	22	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Mean	0		0		0		0		0		0
25% HCA (Positive Control)	24	0	0	1	0	2	1	1	1	1	1	0	1
	25	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1
	26	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
	27	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	0
	28	0	0	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1
	Mean	0		0.3		1.1		1		1		0.5
5% (v/v)	44	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	1	1	0	0
	45	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	1	0
	46	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	47	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0
	48	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0
	Mean	0		0		0.1		0.3		0.7		0.2
10% (v/v)	49	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	1
	50	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	1
	51	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
	52	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	1	0
	53	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0
	Mean	0		0		0.2		0.6		0.7		0.4
25% (v/v)	54	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	2	2	2	2	2
	55	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
	56	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
	57	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	2	2	1	2
	58	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
	Mean	0		0		0.9		1.3		1.4		1.3

DaAE: Dimethylacetaminde:Acetone:Ethanol 4:3:3, solvent control

HCA: hexyl cinnamic aldehyde, positive control

Table 3: Results Stimulation Index

Treatment	Animal	Optical Density			Mean OD	SI
		OD1	OD 2	OD 3
DaAE vehicle	19	0.04	0.037	0.047	0.041	0.3
	20	0.108	0.094	0.112	0.105	0.8
	21	0.201	0.212	0.17	0.194	1.5
	22	0.112	0.111	0.15	0.124	1
	23	0.215	0.142	0.19	0.182	1.4
	Mean				0.129	1
	StDev				0.062	0.5
25% HCA pos. Control	24	0.433	0.539	0.451	0.474	3.7
	25	0.506	0.521	0.478	0.502	3.9
	26	0.473	0.528	0.609	0.537	4.1
	27	0.397	0.345	0.354	0.365	2.8
	28	0.339	0.375	0.266	0.327	2.5
	Mean				0.441	3.4a
	StDev				0.09	0.7
5% (v/v)	44	0.103	0.165	0.118	0.129	1
	45	0.366	0.247	0.373	0.329	2.5
	46	0.266	0.22	0.265	0.251	1.9
	47	0.225	0.206	0.212	0.215	1.7
	48	0.226	0.22	0.192	0.213	1.6
	Mean				0.227	1.8a
	StDev				0.072	0.6
10% (v/v)	49	0.28	0.344	0.362	0.329	2.5
	50	0.344	0.277	0.289	0.304	2.3
	51	0.206	0.233	0.278	0.239	1.8
	52	0.25	0.218	0.143	0.204	1.6
	53	0.287	0.235	0.24	0.254	2
	Mean				0.266	2.1a
	StDev				0.05	0.4
25% (v/v)	54	0.222	0.193	0.228	0.215	1.7
	55	0.183	0.208	0.206	0.199	1.5
	56	0.384	0.321	0.314	0.34	2.6
	57	0.302	0.274	0.342	0.306	2.4
	58	0.412	0.363	0.281	0.352	2.7
	Mean				0.283	2.2a
	StDev				0.071	0.6

a = SI of 1.6 or more indicates a sensitizing response

DaAE: Dimethylacetaminde:Acetone:Ethanol 4:3:3, solvent control

HCA: hexyl cinnamic aldehyde, positive control

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

other: Skin Sens. 1 (H317) according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008

Conclusions:

CLP: Skin Sens. 1