Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The predicted oral LD50 of the substance is 1981,52 mg/kg by Consensus method.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Documentation about the justification is provided in attachment (See Supporting information). The reliability assessment of the prediction is presented in the attached document as well (QPRF).
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: ECHA guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
CC(=O)N1C2=CC=CC=C2CCC3=CC=CC=C31
Species:
rat
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 981.52 mg/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: Consensus Method

The prediction was deemed to be reliable on the basis of the parameters listed above. The molecule falls into the applicability domain of the model.

Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The acute oral LD50 of the substance was predicted to be 1981.52 mg/kg bw

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Since the predicted LD50 is very close to the cut-off for classification/non-classification and considering the variability of the QSAR prediction, data are deemed to inconclusive for C&L.