Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-073-0 | CAS number: 50-97-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 January - 22 February 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study was conducted in accordance with International guidelines and GLP. All guideline validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 A (Ready Biodegradability: DOC Die Away Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 835.3110 (Ready Biodegradability)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): Wareham Wastewater Treatment Plant, Wareham, Massachusetts, which receives primarily domestic waste
- Laboratory culture: N/A
- Method of cultivation: N/A
- Storage conditions: Aerated
- Storage length: 1 month
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The activated sludge used for this study was obtained from the Wareham Wastewater Treatment Plant, Wareham, Massachusetts, which receives primarily domestic waste. Approximately 4 L of activated sludge was collected on 16 January 2018 and transported to the testing laboratory. Upon arrival at the testing laboratory, the sludge was passed through a 2-mm sieve and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, the sludge was washed with mineral medium, the contents were centrifuged at least once again, and the supernatant was discarded. The moisture content of the activated sludge was determined, using an automated moisture analyzer (Sartorius MA-150), to be 96.14 % and the percent solids determined to be 3.86 %. A 15 mg solids/mL inoculum solution was prepared (77.72 g wet weight sludge brought to 200 mL with mineral media) and aerated until used. Each 2-L test vessel received 3.0 mL of the inoculum to produce an inoculum concentration of 30 mg/L. Each test vessel contained 1.5 L of mineral medium.
- Pretreatment: No
- Concentration of sludge: Described above
- Initial cell/biomass concentration: N/A
- Water filtered: No
- Type and size of filter used, if any: N/A - Duration of test (contact time):
- 35 d
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- DOC
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Mineral Salts Medium - as per OECD 301A - prepared using purified water.
- Additional substrate: No
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): No
- Test temperature: 22 ± 2 ºC
- pH: Not reported
- pH adjusted: No
- CEC (meq/100 g): Not reported
- Aeration of dilution water: Each test unit was loosely covered with perforated Parafilm to allow for free gas exchange.
- Suspended solids concentration: 3.86 g/L
- Continuous darkness: yes
- Other: N/A
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: Each test unit consisted of a 2-L glass Erlenmeyer flask which was loosely covered with perforated Parafilm to allow for free gas exchange. The flasks were placed on a mechanical shaker table set to 125 rpm in the dark.
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Six test vessels were established: two for the test substance, two inoculum blanks, one sodium benzoate procedure control, and one toxicity control
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: Each test unit was loosely covered with perforated Parafilm to allow for free gas exchange.
- Method used to create anaerobic conditions: N/A
- Measuring equipment: Samples were analyzed using a Shimadzu TOC-L dissolved organic carbon analyzer.
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: No
- Test performed in open system: Yes
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: N/A
- Other: N/A
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: On test days 0, 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 22, 25, 28, and 35, duplicate 20-mL samples were removed from each test vessel.
- Sampling method: Duplicate 20-mL samples were removed from each test vessel. Prior to sampling, the volume in the flasks was checked for losses by comparing the liquid level from the last interval, but no adjustments were necessary. The samples were analyzed using a Shimadzu TOC-L dissolved organic carbon analyzer.
- Sterility check if applicable: N/A
- Sample storage before analysis: Not reported
- Other: N/A
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: 3 mL inoculum
- Abiotic sterile control: Not conducted
- Toxicity control: 10 mg C/L test item + 10 mg C/L sodium benzoate + 3 mL inoculum
- Other: Procedural control: 10 mg C/L sodium benzoate + 3 mL inoculum
STATISTICAL METHODS:
The DOC of each test substance and reference substance flask was corrected by subtracting the mean of the blank control values from the mean of the test and reference substances. The resulting net DOC was used to calculate biodegradability.
The percent biodegradability for each test system was calculated using the following equation and is expressed as cumulative percent biodegradation (or percent of theoretical DOC).
% biodeg. = (1 - ((DOC at time t - DOC in blank at time t) / (DOC at 0 h - DOC in blank at 0 h))) * 100 - Reference substance:
- other: sodium benzoate
- Test performance:
- The net DOC measured in the procedure control (sodium benzoate) system decreased from 10.24 mg/L (day 0) to 0.07 mg/L by day 4, confirming the almost total degradation of the reference substance. Degradation of 99.36% was recorded by day 4, which surpassed the OECD minimum criteria of 70% degradation by day 14.
The net DOC values observed in the toxicity control vessel decreased from 22.31 mg/L at day 0 to 12.00 mg/L at day 4 and 8.75 mg/L at day 28, indicating 46.20% and 60.80% degradation had occurred by day 4 and day 28, respectively. The OECD criterion of greater than 35% degradation (based on DOC) within 14 days was met by the toxicity control replicate. This indicated that the test substance was not toxic to the microbial community present in the test vessels. - Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (DOC removal)
- Value:
- 32.5
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (DOC removal)
- Value:
- 32.16
- Sampling time:
- 35 d
- Details on results:
- Test item is not readily biodegradable.
The net DOC measured in the procedure control (sodium benzoate) system decreased from 10.24 mg/L (day 0) to 0.07 mg/L by day 4, confirming the almost total degradation of the reference substance. Degradation of 99.36% was recorded by day 4, which surpassed the OECD minimum criteria of 70% degradation by day 14.
The net DOC values observed in the toxicity control vessel decreased from 22.31 mg/L at day 0 to 12.00 mg/L at day 4 and 8.75 mg/L at day 28, indicating 46.20% and 60.80% degradation had occurred by day 4 and day 28, respectively. The OECD criterion of greater than 35% degradation (based on DOC) within 14 days was met by the toxicity control replicate. This indicated that the test substance was not toxic to the microbial community present in the test vessels. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study, the test item cannot be classified as readily biodegradable since greater than 70% biodegradation was not observed.
- Executive summary:
OECD 301A (2018) - The ready biodegradability of the test item was assessed in accordance with OECD Procedure 301A ‘DOC Die-Away Test’, adopted 17 July 1992.
The test was added to two bottles containing mineral salts medium inoculated with activated sludge (30 mg solids/L) to give a nominal test concentration of 10 mg C/L. Two control cultures contained inoculated mineral salts medium alone. Two cultures contained inoculated mineral salts medium plus the reference substance sodium benzoate (10 mg C/L) of which one also contained the test item (10 mg C/L) in order to assess the potential inhibitory effects of the test substance on the microbial inoculum. Duplicate 20 mL subsamples were taken from each of the bioreactor vessels on Day 0, 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 22, 25, 28 and 35 for analysis using a Shimadzu TOC analyser. The DOC of each vessel was calculated and from which the biodegradation determined.
In the test substance systems, the mean net DOC was 11.98 mg/L on day 0, 8.09 mg/L on day 28 and 8.13 mg/L on day 35. These data indicate that 32.50% and 32.16% degradation of the test substance occurred under the conditions of this study after correcting for the background DOC measured in the inoculum blanks at day 28 and day 35, respectively.
The net DOC measured in the procedure control (sodium benzoate) system decreased from 10.24 mg/L (day 0) to 0.07 mg/L by day 4, confirming the almost total degradation of the reference substance. Degradation of 99.36% was recorded by day 4, which surpassed the OECD minimum criteria of 70% degradation by day 14.
The net DOC values observed in the toxicity control vessel decreased from 22.31 mg/L at day 0 to 12.00 mg/L at day 4 and 8.75 mg/L at day 28, indicating 46.20% and 60.80% degradation had occurred by day 4 and day 28, respectively. The OECD criterion of greater than 35% degradation (based on DOC) within 14 days was met by the toxicity control replicate. This indicated that the test substance was not toxic to the microbial community present in the test vessels.
Based on the results of this study, the test item cannot be classified as readily biodegradable.
Reference
Table2 Mean dissolved organic carbon (mg C/L) measured in the test vessels
Vessel |
Rep. |
Day |
||||||||||
0 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
18 |
22 |
25 |
28 |
35 |
||
Test item |
A |
12.63 |
12.48 |
12.65 |
12.61 |
12.62 |
12.45 |
12.43 |
12.30 |
9.91 |
8.69 |
9.54 |
B |
12.43 |
12.39 |
12.45 |
12.75 |
12.72 |
12.62 |
12.52 |
12.32 |
10.45 |
9.16 |
10.03 |
|
Mean |
12.53 |
12.44 |
12.55 |
12.68 |
12.67 |
12.54 |
12.48 |
12.31 |
10.18 |
8.93 |
9.79 |
|
Blank control |
A |
0.56 |
0.62 |
0.69 |
0.70 |
0.78 |
0.76 |
0.80 |
0.83 |
0.75 |
0.83 |
1.87 |
B |
0.53 |
0.49 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.76 |
0.73 |
0.75 |
0.86 |
0.72 |
0.85 |
1.45 |
|
Mean |
0.55 |
0.56 |
0.66 |
0.66 |
0.77 |
0.75 |
0.77 |
0.84 |
0.73 |
0.84 |
1.66 |
|
Procedure control |
|
10.79 |
7.23 |
0.72 |
0.76 |
0.86 |
0.77 |
0.80 |
0.94 |
0.86 |
0.88 |
1.40 |
Toxicity control |
|
22.86 |
19.21 |
12.66 |
12.47 |
12.46 |
12.42 |
12.54 |
12.33 |
12.19 |
9.59 |
10.04 |
Table3 Mean net dissolved organic carbon (mg C/L) measured in the test vessels
Vessel |
Rep. |
Day |
||||||||||
0 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
18 |
22 |
25 |
28 |
35 |
||
Test item |
A |
12.08 |
11.92 |
11.99 |
11.95 |
11.85 |
11.70 |
11.66 |
11.46 |
9.18 |
7.85 |
7.88 |
B |
11.88 |
11.83 |
11.79 |
12.09 |
11.95 |
11.87 |
11.75 |
11.48 |
9.72 |
8.32 |
8.37 |
|
Mean |
11.98 |
11.88 |
11.89 |
12.02 |
11.90 |
11.79 |
11.70 |
11.47 |
9.45 |
8.09 |
8.13 |
|
Procedure control |
|
10.24 |
6.67 |
0.07 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.04 |
-0.26 |
Toxicity control |
|
22.31 |
18.65 |
12.00 |
11.81 |
11.69 |
11.67 |
11.77 |
11.49 |
11.46 |
8.75 |
8.38 |
Table4 Biodegradation, expressed as a percent of the theoretical
Vessel |
Rep. |
Day |
||||||||||
0 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
18 |
22 |
25 |
28 |
35 |
||
Test item |
A |
0 |
1.32 |
0.74 |
1.10 |
1.91 |
3.15 |
3.52 |
5.18 |
24.03 |
35.05 |
34.76 |
B |
0 |
0.42 |
0.75 |
-1.74 |
-0.58 |
0.09 |
1.14 |
3.42 |
18.23 |
29.94 |
29.56 |
|
Mean |
0 |
0.87 |
0.74 |
-0.32 |
0.67 |
1.62 |
2.33 |
4.30 |
21.13 |
32.50 |
32.16 |
|
Procedure control |
|
0 |
34.88 |
99.36 |
99.00 |
99.08 |
99.76 |
99.78 |
99.09 |
98.80 |
99.64 |
102.51 |
Toxicity control |
|
0 |
16.40 |
46.20 |
47.07 |
47.60 |
47.69 |
47.26 |
48.52 |
48.66 |
60.80 |
62.44 |
Description of key information
28 day biodegradation (based on DOC) = <70 % (mean actual = 32.5 %), not readily biodegradable; OECD 301A; McLaughlin, S. (2018)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
OECD 301A (2018) - The ready biodegradability of the test item was assessed in accordance with OECD Procedure 301A ‘DOC Die-Away Test’, adopted 17 July 1992.
The test was added to two bottles containing mineral salts medium inoculated with activated sludge (30 mg solids/L) to give a nominal test concentration of 10 mg C/L. Two control cultures contained inoculated mineral salts medium alone. Two cultures contained inoculated mineral salts medium plus the reference substance sodium benzoate (10 mg C/L) of which one also contained the test item (10 mg C/L) in order to assess the potential inhibitory effects of the test substance on the microbial inoculum. Duplicate 20 mL subsamples were taken from each of the bioreactor vessels on Day 0, 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 22, 25, 28 and 35 for analysis using a Shimadzu TOC analyser. The DOC of each vessel was calculated and from which the biodegradation determined.
In the test substance systems, the mean net DOC was 11.98 mg/L on day 0, 8.09 mg/L on day 28 and 8.13 mg/L on day 35. These data indicate that 32.50% and 32.16% degradation of the test substance occurred under the conditions of this study after correcting for the background DOC measured in the inoculum blanks at day 28 and day 35, respectively.
The net DOC measured in the procedure control (sodium benzoate) system decreased from 10.24 mg/L (day 0) to 0.07 mg/L by day 4, confirming the almost total degradation of the reference substance. Degradation of 99.36% was recorded by day 4, which surpassed the OECD minimum criteria of 70% degradation by day 14.
The net DOC values observed in the toxicity control vessel decreased from 22.31 mg/L at day 0 to 12.00 mg/L at day 4 and 8.75 mg/L at day 28, indicating 46.20% and 60.80% degradation had occurred by day 4 and day 28, respectively. The OECD criterion of greater than 35% degradation (based on DOC) within 14 days was met by the toxicity control replicate. This indicated that the test substance was not toxic to the microbial community present in the test vessels.
Based on the results of this study, the test item cannot be classified as readily biodegradable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.