Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Melting point / freezing point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
melting point/freezing point
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18 Sep - 5 Nov 1996
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 102 (Melting point / Melting Range)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
differential scanning calorimetry
Melting / freezing pt.:
>= 78.7 - <= 79.7 °C
Atm. press.:
ca. 1 013 hPa
Decomposition:
yes
Decomp. temp.:
235 °C

Screening experiment:

Temperature program: 25 °C — > 320 °C (20 K/Min), aluminum crucible with perforated lid. The screening curves of all samples investigated are similar.

The following table gives individual results, averages and relative standard deviations for the endothermic and exothermic peaks for all batches.

batch

endo

 

 

 

exo

 

 

 

 

AH

onset

Peak

Peak width

AH

onset

Peak

Peak width

 

[J/g]

[°C]

[°C]

[°C]

[J/g]

[°C]

[°C]

[°C]

960110ELB01

-80.57

80.54

84.61

5.33

411.55

235.24

255.31

18.85

898443001

-81 .26

79.57

82.73

3.5

595.69

231.35

255.46

23.92

898443002

-86.16

80.4

84.41

5.53

445.05

234.85

255.37

20.59

898443003

-84.26

80.14

84.43

5.59

470.81

232.92

255.41

22.14

898443004

-80.91

79.44

83.47

5.35

451.66

235.4

255.96

19.51

898443005

-81 .32

79.79

83.72

5.29

410.09

235.59

256

19.63

898443006

-79.46

79.69

83.19

4.38

379.15

235.82

256.37

19.86

898443007

-81.6

79.86

84.46

7.16

456.93

236.82

257.27

17.21

average

-81.94

79.93

83.88

5.27

452.62

234.75

255.89

20.21

rsd [%]

-2.66

0.49

0.84

19.89

14.41

0.75

0.26

10.14

In the following table individual results for all batches of first the experiment and the averages and relative standard deviations for both experiments (2 K/min and 0.6 K/min) are given:

batch

sample weight

purity

Tf

Tf, pure

DeltaHFusion

Corr. factor

 

[mg]

[Mol-%]

[°C]

[°C]

[J/g]

[%]

960110ELB01

6.10

98.771

79.68

80.12

84.22

14.48

898 443 001

6.40

99.129

79.02

79.36

73.97

9.17

898 443 002

5.90

99.423

79.38

79.59

83.97

7.73

898 443 003

7.07

98.933

79.69

80.05

87.98

12.08

898 443 004

3.49

99.122

78.75

79.06

82.97

9.50

898 443 005

3.96

99.092

78.91

79.24

81.39

9.82

898 443 006

7.03

98.974

79.03

79.39

82.41

9.02

898 443 007

6.01

99.034

78.70

79.05

81.41

8.79

average

5.75

99.060

79.15

79.48

82.29

10.07

rsd [%]

23.10

0.190

0.50

0.52

4.82

21.52

0.6 K/Min

 

 

 

 

 

 

average

7.55

99.144

78.62

78.92

83.38

11.63

rsd [%]

43.47

0.225

0.30

0.26

3.34

15.55

The melting points and enthalpies of fusion show relatively high standard deviations and there is a significant difference depending on the rate of heating. The melting enthalpies found in the experiment with 2 K/min ( ΔHF 82.3 J/g + 4.8 %) are a little less but comparable to those found in the screening experiment ( ΔHF 83.9 J/g ± 0.8 %) using a faster heating (20K/min) and the second experiment for purity determination using a lower heating ramp yields ΔHF close to the value from screening.

Batches 898 443 001 and 898 443 007 were measured three times at 2 K/min. Individual results of the additional runs, averages of the three results for these two batches, and relative standard deviations are given in the following table:

batch

sample weight

purity

Tf

Tf, pure

DeltaHFusion

Corr. factor

 

[mg]

[Mol-%]

[°C]

[°C]

[J/g]

[%]

898 443 001

2.74

99.369

78.46

78.7

77.12

7.48

898 443 001

3.73

99.225

78.67

78.96

77.35

9.69

898 443 007

6.16

99.204

78.57

78.87

78.15

8.23

898 443 007

7.29

99.07

79.06

79.46

67.4

8.27

average of 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

898 443 001

4.29

99.24

78.72

79.01

76.15

8.78

rsd [%]

44.13

0.12

0.36

0.42

2.48

13.16

898 443 007

6.91

99.11

78.90

79.26

70.98

8.26

rsd [%]

10.12

0.09

0.32

0.38

10.33

3.78

Three experiments were carried out:

1.) Batch 898 443 001 (6.87 mg, sealed aluminum crucible) with the following temperature program:

Segment

start temperature [°C]

ramp [K/min]

end temperature [°C]

1,4,7,10

62

0.5

82

2,5,8, 11

82

-5

0

3,6,9,12

0

5

62

In the first segment melting is observed (Tf 78.17 °C, Purity 99.045 mol%, AH 77.09 J/g) but recrystallization and remelting is not observed. A glass transition is found in the heating segments 3, 6, 9, and 12: midpoint 5.28, 5.13, 3.06, and 3.45 °C, average: 4.2 ± 1.1 °C

2.) Batch 898 443 001 (7.03 mg, sealed aluminum crucible) with the following temperature program:

Segment

start temperature [°C]

ramp [K/min]

end temperature [°C]

1

25

10

60

2, 5, 8,

60

2

82

3, 6, 9,

82

-10

-10

4,7,10,

-10

10

60

Virtually the same curves are obtained. Melting occurs in the second segment (Tf 79.09 °C, purity 99.130 mol%, AH 76.82 J/g) and the glass transition is observed upon heating at the same temperature (midpoint 3.3 ± 0.02 °C).

 

3.) a sample of batch 898 443 001 was recrystallized from 2-propanol and dried in vacuo (0.18 % 2-propanol according to headspace GC in the sample). Temperature program as in 1.

Again virtually the same curves are obtained. Melting occurs in the first segment (Tf 78.33 °C, purity 99.51 mol%, AH 81.15 J/g) and the glass transition is observed upon heating at slightly higher temperature (midpoint 5.6 ±0.15 °C).

TGA:

The first decomposition step corresponds to loss of a fragment with mass ~ 349.9 x 0.99 x 0.5684 = 197 (molecular weight of YRC 2388 x purity x step height). Kinetic evaluation of the SDTA (= Single Differential Thermal Analysis, comparable to DSC, but less accurate) peak, gives n = 1.05, EA = 199 kJ/mol, and In(kO) = 41 in very good agreement with the above result from screening DSC.

The melting point is found to be very sensitive to measuring conditions.

There is no indication from either differential scanning experiments nor from infrared spectra that a second crystalline modification is present. From a more polar solvent the same crystalline modification precipitates.

There are strong indications of some amorphous portions in the precipitated samples, as the enthalpies of fusion vary more than usual. Recrystallization of the substance could not be achieved. The melt solidifies as a glass with a glass transition temperature at approximately 5 °C.

From DSC and TGA analysis a remarkable thermostability of the substance is inferred. The decomposition starts with onset temperature 235 °C (at 20 K/min heating rate). The first decomposition step corresponds to a defined chemical reaction.

The melting point of substance depends on the measuring conditions and for the pure substance the range is: 78.7 - 79.7 °C from the experiments reported here.

The test substance is stable in the melt and decomposition is slow up to a temperature of above 200°C.

From the melt no recrystallization could be achieved, the product solidifies as a glassy melt with a glass transition around 5 °C. The samples seem not to be completely crystalline but to contain some amorphous portions (as estimated from the enthalpies of fusion). A sample crystallized from 2-propanol (a solvent not used in the technical process) has the same melting point as the starting material.

No indications were as yet found of a metastable crystal modification.

Description of key information

Melting range = 78.7-79.7 °C at ca. 1013 hPa (OECD Guideline 102, differential scanning calorimetry)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Decomposition observed starting at 235 °C.