Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-199-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
As cryolite dissociates in water and the risks are assumed to be determined by fluoride, it is more appropriate to assess the adsorption behaviour of fluoride. In a column leaching test, Koc values varying from 603 - 6502 were found for fluoride in 4 different soils, tested at cryolite concentrations varying from 5 - 50 ppm (Dykeman, 1985). As the percentage of fluoride in the molar weight in both substances is practically identical, namely 54% for cryolite and 53% for aluminium potassium fluoride, similar Koc values can be expected for aluminium potassium fluoride. The geometric mean of 1498 (log Koc 3.18) will be used in the assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
As no information is available on adsorption/desorption of aluminium potassium fluoride, data from its structural analogue cryolite is taken into account. In a column leaching study using four different soils with cryolite at an equivalent application rate of 16 lb/acre, fluoride (the only species monitored) showed little mobility. A fluoride ion specific electrode was used for quantitation. Background fluoride concentrations from the control soils, which varied from about 2 to 14 ppm, were subtracted from the treated soils. Most fluoride remained within the top 24 cm of the columns. Some extraneous leaching did occur to a maximum depth interval of 36-42 cm, but was probably an artefact of method limitations and/or natural soil variation. No fluoride was detected in the leachate of the 42 cm columns. For comparison, sodium fluoride, which was run through equivalent soil columns at equivalent fluoride concentration, showed virtually the same leaching profile for fluoride as cryolite (Dykeman, 1985). Koc values are given in the Table below.
Table: Measured Kd values and calculated approximate Koc value based on the assumption that % organic carbon ~ % organic matter / 1.724
Soil
|
% organic matter (measured)
|
% organic carbon (calculated) |
Measured Kd range
|
Calculated Koc range
|
Lakeland sand |
0.4 |
0.23 |
1.4 – 6.6 |
603-2,844 |
Ramona Sandy Loam |
0.9 |
0.52 |
8.1 – 15.1 |
1,552 -2,892 |
Aguila Clay Loam |
1.4 |
0.81 |
7.9 -10.7 |
973 – 1.318 |
Calhoun Silt Loam |
1.4 |
0.81 |
19.3 – 52.8 |
2,377 – 6,502 |
The data show two striking features. First, there are large soil-dependent differences in sorption that were mentioned before, with "apparent" simple Kd values ranging from 1 to 53 in standard units (calculated range of apparent Koc values is from approximately 600 to 6500, see Table). Second, there is a pronounced, regular concentration-dependent spread of Kd values within three of the four individual soils. For these three soils the higher the concentration, the lower the Kd. For example, in sand with 5 ppm of cryolite, the Kd is 6.6, but at 50 ppm of cryolite, the Kd is only 1.4.
These features prompted the U.S. EPA to conduct a Freundlich analysis using the reported data. Results yielded exponents (1/n values) of approximately 1/2 for three soils (exponents of 0.56, 0.49, and 0.69 for sand, sandy loam, and silt loam soils, respectively) (U.S. EPA, 1996). The exponent of about 1/2, the seeming approach to "saturation" of fluoride, and the apparent lack of correlation with organic matter in these soils suggested that the mineral precipitation with a divalent cation is responsible for the observed behaviour.
As calcium is usually a dominant exchangeable cation in soils, and also forms insoluble calcium fluoride, the U.S. EPA tested the precipitation hypothesis using the adsorption data, the solubility product constant for calcium fluoride (the mineral fluorite), and the assumptions that approximately half of the fluorine in cryolite is available as fluoride and that exchangeable calcium ion in many soils usually accounts for about 0.1 to 0.2 of the maximum CEC (individual exchangeable cations were not reported). Calculations using the various measured Kd's and water to soil ratios showed fluoride concentrations consistent with those predicted.
Unlike the other three soils, the fourth soil (Aguila clay loam) had uniform sorption coefficients for all four of the tested concentrations. Kd values averaged approximately 8.9 ± 1.3 in standard units, the pH is 8.0, and its CEC is given as 43.6 meq/100 g. These high values are typical of a calcareous soil and require special interpretation. With a large reserve of calcium, small changes in its equilibrium concentration due to precipitation with fluoride are offset, and the soil is far from being saturated with fluoride. Additional calcium ion available from equilibrium with abundant solid carbonate opposes any shifts in dissolved calcium concentration. Thus, the observed sorption behaviour is again explainable if calcium fluoride precipitation occurs. As the percentage of fluoride in the molar weight in both substances is practically identical, namely 54% for cryolite and 53% for aluminium potassium fluoride, similarKoc values can be expected for aluminium potassium fluoride.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.