Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
02-2019
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other company data
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
A sieve analysis on the test sample was performed
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
sieving
Type of particle tested:
other: powder
Type of distribution:
mass based distribution

Test material

1
Reference substance name:
Reaction product of Graphite, acid-treated and potassium permanganate
IUPAC Name:
Reaction product of Graphite, acid-treated and potassium permanganate

Results and discussion

Particle size distribution at different passagesopen allclose all
No.:
#1
Size:
< 250 µm
Distribution:
99.07 %
No.:
#2
Size:
< 149 µm
Distribution:
60.04 %
No.:
#3
Size:
< 74 µm
Distribution:
29.9 %
No.:
#4
Size:
< 44 µm
Distribution:
17.3 %

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
99.07 % passed the 250 µm sieve
60.04 % passed the 149 µm sieve
28.90 % passed the 74 µm sieve
17.32 % passed the 44 µm sieve
Executive summary:

The particle size distribution of the sample was analysed through sieving. 5 Different sieves were with the following mesh size (250, 149, 74 and 44 µm). The following distribution was observed:

99.07 % passed the 250 µm sieve

60.04 % passed the 149 µm sieve

28.90 % passed the 74 µm sieve

17.32 % passed the 44 µm sieve