2-{(E)-[6-({4-chloro-6-[(4-{[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl}phenyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}amino)-1-hydroxy-3-sulfonaphthalen-2-yl]diazenyl}naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

Acute oral toxicity: 

The acute oral toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats and mice for the test chemical. The LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.

Acute Inhalation Toxicity:

The acute inhalation toxicity study need not be conducted because exposure to humans via inhalation route is not likely taking into account due to the low vapour pressure of the test chemical, which is reported to be 3.70E-42 mm Hg. Thus, exposure to inhalable dust, mist and vapour of the chemical is highly unlikely. Therefore this study is considered for waiver. 

Acute Dermal toxicity:

The acute dermal toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the test chemical. The studies concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: oral

Type of information:

read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

data from handbook or collection of data

Remarks:

experimental data from various test chemicals

Justification for type of information:

Data is summarized based on the available information from various test chemicals.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

other: As mentioned below

Principles of method if other than guideline:

WoE report is based on 3 acute oral toxicity studies as - WoE 2, WoE 3 and WoE 4.
Acute Oral toxicity test was carried out to study the effects of the test chemicals on rodents.

GLP compliance:

not specified

Test type:

other: not specified

Limit test:

no

Species:

other: 1. rat 2. mouse 3. rat

Strain:

other: 1. Carworth Farm Strain E SPF 2. DDY 3. not specified

Sex:

male/female

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

1. TEST ANIMALS
- Fasting period before study:18 hours
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Spillers Small Laboratory Animal Diet was given to animal
2. Details on test animal
TEST ANIMALS
Source: Japan SLC Co., Shizuoka, Japan
Age at study initiation: 7 weeks
Diet (e.g. ad libitum): commercial pellets MF (Oriental Yeast Industries Co., Tokyo, Japan), ad libitum
Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap Water, ad libitum
Acclimation period: 1 week of acclimatization
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Temperature (°C): The animal room was at 20–24°C
Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h
3. not specified

Route of administration:

other: 1. oral: gavage 2. oral: unspecified 3. oral: unspecified

Vehicle:

other: 1. water 2. physiological saline 3. not specified

Details on oral exposure:

1. VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle:5000 mg/kg
- Justification for choice of vehicle: Test substance was soluble in water
2. MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 0.5 × LD50 or the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg.
3. not specified

Doses:

1. 5000 mg/kg
2. 2000 mg/kg
3. 5000 mg/kg

No. of animals per sex per dose:

1. Total: 10 animals
5000 mg/kg :5 males and 5 females
2. 4 - 5 male mice
3. not specified

Control animals:

not specified

Details on study design:

1. - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: no
- Other examinations performed: Clinical signs
2. not specified
3. not specified

Statistics:

1. Litchfield & Wilcoxon (1949)
2. not specified
3. not specified

Preliminary study:

1. not specified
2. not specified
3. not specified

Sex:

male/female

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 5 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: No mortality was observed

Sex:

male

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 2 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: No mortality was observed

Sex:

not specified

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

5 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Mortality:

1. No mortality was observed in treated rats at 5000 mg/kg bw.
2. No mortality observed at 2000 mg/kg bw.
3. 50% mortality was observed.

Clinical signs:

1. In clinical signs examination, a substantial amount of coloured material was excreted in the faeces.
2. not specified
3. not specified

Body weight:

1. not specified
2. not specified
3. not specified

Gross pathology:

1. not specified
2. not specified
3. not specified

Other findings:

1. not specified
2. not specified
3. not specified

Interpretation of results:

other: Not classified

Conclusions:

According to CLP regulation, the test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity, as the LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw.

Executive summary:

In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents,

i.e. most commonly in rats and mice for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below –

Acute oral toxicity study was done in group of 5 male and female Carworth Farm Strain E SPF rats using test material. No mortality was observed at dose 5000 mg/kg bw. In clinical signs examination, substantial amounts of coloured material were excreted in the faeces. Hence, LD50 value was considered to be >5000 mg/kg bw, when rats were treated with test chemical orally.

The above study is supported with another study mentioned in publication and conducted on mice for the test chemical. The acute oral toxicity study was conducted in 4 - 5 male DDY mice by using test chemical at the concentration of 2000 mg/kg bw according to comet assay. The given test chemical was dissolve in physiological saline and administered as 0.5ml x LD50 or 2000 mg/kg bw in mice. No mortality was observed at 2000 mg/kg bw in treated mice. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw, when male DDY mice were treated with test chemical via oral route.

Both the above studies are further supported with the study mentioned in secondary source for the test chemical. Acute oral toxicity study was done in rats using the given test chemical. 50% mortality was observed at dose 5000 mg/kg bw. Hence, the LD50 value was considered to be 5000 mg/kg body weight, when rats were treated with the given test chemical orally.

Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Value:

2 000 mg/kg bw

Quality of whole database:

Data is Klimisch 2 and from publication.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: inhalation

Data waiving:

other justification

Justification for data waiving:

other:

Endpoint conclusion

Quality of whole database:

Waiver

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: dermal

Type of information:

read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

data from handbook or collection of data

Remarks:

experimental data from various test chemicals

Justification for type of information:

Data is summarized based on the available information from various test chemicals.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

other: As mentioned below

Principles of method if other than guideline:

WoE report is based on 3 acute dermal toxicity studies as- WoE 2, WoE 3 and WoE 4.
Acute dermal toxicity test was carried out to study the effects of the test chemicals on rodents.

GLP compliance:

not specified

Test type:

other: not specified

Limit test:

no

Species:

rat

Strain:

other: 1. Sprague-Dawley 2. Sprague-Dawley 3. not specified

Sex:

male/female

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

1. TEST ANIMALS
- Source: National Institute of Biosciences, Pune.
- Age at study initiation: Young adult male and female rats aged between 6 – 9 weeks were used.
- Weight at study initiation: The weight ranges of approximately 239.1 to 272.5 grams at initiation of dosing were used.
Body weights at the start : Maln Mean: 269.94 g (= 100 %); Minimum : 266.4 g (- 1.31 %); Maximum : 272.5 g (+ 0.95 %)
Female Mean: 244.56 g (= 100 %); Minimum : 239.1 g (- 2.23 %); Maximum : 250.4 g (+ 2.39 %)
- Housing: The rats were individually housed in polycarbonate cages with paddy husk as bedding.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rodent feed supplied by the Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune, was provided ad libitum from individual feeders.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water was provided ad libitum from individual bottles attached to the cages. All water was from a local source and passed through the reverse osmosis membrane before use.
- Acclimation period: 5 days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.1 to 22.3 degree centigrade.
- Humidity (%): 55.7% to 59.6%.
- Air changes (per hr): Ten to fifteen air changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): An artificial light and dark cycle of 12 hours each was provided to the room.
IN-LIFE DATES: 30-09-2016 to 15-10-2016
2. TEST ANIMALS
- Source: National Institute of Biosciences, Pune.
- Age at study initiation: Young adult male and female rats aged between 6 – 9 weeks were used.
- Weight at study initiation: The weight ranges of approximately 210.2 to 245.4 grams at initiation of dosing were used.
Body weights at the start : Male Mean: 240.40 g (= 100 %); Minimum : 234.6 g (- 2.41 %); Maximum : 245.4 g (+ 2.08 %)
Female Mean: 215.98 g (= 100 %); Minimum : 210.2 g (- 2.68 %); Maximum : 220.6 g (+ 2.14 %)
- Housing: The rats were individually housed in polycarbonate cages with paddy husk as bedding.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rodent feed supplied by the Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune, was provided ad libitum from individual feeders.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water was provided ad libitum from individual bottles attached to the cages. All water was from a local source and passed through the reverse osmosis membrane before use.
- Acclimation period: 5 days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Room temperature was maintained at 20.1 to 21.9 degree centigrade.
- Humidity (%): Room humidity was maintained at 55.5% to 59.2%.
- Air changes (per hr): The animal room was independently provided with at least ten to fifteen air changes per hour of 100% fresh air that had been passed through the HEPA filters.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): An artificial light and dark cycle of 12 hours each was provided to the room.
3. not specified

Type of coverage:

other: 1. occlusive 2. occlusive 3. Dermal

Vehicle:

other: 1. water 2. water 3. unchanged (no vehicle)

Details on dermal exposure:

1. TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Trunk (dorsal surface and sides from scapular to pelvic area)
- % coverage: Approximately 10% of the total body surface area.
- Type of wrap if used: Porous gauze dressing and non-irritating tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Distilled water was used to remove residual test item.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bw
- For solids, paste formed: Yes
2. TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Dorsal surface and sides from scapular to pelvic area.
- % coverage: Approximately 10% of the total body surface area.
- Type of wrap if used: Porous gauze dressing and non-irritating tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Distilled water was used to remove residual test item.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bw.
3. not specified

Duration of exposure:

1. 24 hours
2. 24 hours
3. not specified

Doses:

1. A single dose of 2000 mg of the test item per kilogram of body weight was administered to ten rats (five males and five females).
2. A single dose of 2000 mg of the test item per kilogram of body weight was administered to ten rats (five males and five females).
3. 3000 mg/kg bw

No. of animals per sex per dose:

1. 10 (5/sex).
2. 10 (5/sex).
3. not specified

Control animals:

not specified

Details on study design:

1. - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Twice daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes
- Other examinations performed: Clinical Observations and General Appearance: Animals were observed for clinical signs, mortality, until sacrifice.
Onset, duration and severity of any sign were recorded. The clinical signs and mortality observations were conducted at 10, 30, 60 minutes, 2, 4 and 6 hours on the day of dosing and once daily thereafter for 14 day. Daily observation was done as far as possible at the same time.
The observations were included general clinical signs, observations of eyes, mucous membranes, respiratory, circulatory system and behavior pattern.
Evaluation of Dermal Reaction: Dermal reaction was observed daily for study period of 14 days.
Body weights: Individual animal body weights were recorded pre-test (prior to administration of the test item), day 7 and at termination on day 14.
Gross Pathology: Necropsy was performed on animals surviving at the end of the study. Macroscopic examination of all the orifices, cavities and tissues were made and the findings were recorded. All animals surviving the study period were sacrificed by the carbon dioxide asphyxiation technique (day 15).
Histopathology: No gross abnormalities were observed in animals sacrificed terminally hence, no histopathology was performed.
2. - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Twice daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes
- Other examinations performed: Clinical Observations and General Appearance: Animals were observed for clinical signs, mortality, until sacrifice.
Onset, duration and severity of any sign were recorded. The clinical signs and mortality observations were conducted at 10, 30, 60 minutes, 2, 4 and 6 hours on the day of dosing and once daily thereafter for 14 day. Daily observation was done as far as possible at the same time.
The observations were included general clinical signs, observations of eyes, mucous membranes, respiratory, circulatory system and behavior pattern.
Evaluation of Dermal Reaction: Dermal reaction was observed daily for study period of 14 days.
Body weights: Individual animal body weights were recorded pre-test (prior to administration of the test item), day 7 and at termination on day 14.
Gross Pathology: Necropsy was performed on animals surviving at the end of the study. Macroscopic examination of all the orifices, cavities and tissues were made and the findings were recorded. All animals surviving the study period were sacrificed by the carbon dioxide asphyxiation technique (day 15).
3. not specified

Statistics:

1. not specified
2. not specified
3. not specified

Preliminary study:

1. not specified
2. not specified
3. not specified

Sex:

male/female

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 2 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: No mortality was observed

Sex:

male/female

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 2 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

not specified

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 3 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: No mortality was observed

Mortality:

1. Sex : Male Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.
Sex : Female Group I – Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.
2. Sex : Male Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.
Sex : Female Group I – Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.
3. No mortality was observed at 3000 mg/kg bw.

Clinical signs:

1. Sex : Male Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days.
Sex : Female Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days.
2. Sex : Male Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days.
Sex : Female Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days.
3. not specified

Body weight:

1. Sex : Male Group I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 9.69% and 16.50% respectively.
Sex : Female Group I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 5.02% and 9.12% respectively.
2. Sex : Male Group I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 8.88% and 18.87% respectively.
Sex : Female Group I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 4.29% and 9.60% respectively.
3. not specified

Gross pathology:

1. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities in animals from 2000 mg/kg dose group.
2. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities in animals from 2000 mg/kg dose group.
3. not specified

Other findings:

1. - Other observations: Evaluation of Dermal Reaction
Sex : Male Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any skin reaction during the study period of 14 days.
Sex : Female Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any skin reaction during the study period of 14 days.
2. - Other observations: Evaluation of Dermal Reaction
Sex : Male Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any skin reaction during the study period of 14 days.
Sex : Female Group I - Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any skin reaction during the study period of 14 days.
3. not specified

Interpretation of results:

other: Not classified

Conclusions:

According to CLP regulation, the test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity, as the LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw.

Executive summary:

In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below -

The reported study was designed and conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity profile of the given test chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days. Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. It was concluded that the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical, when administered to male and female Sprague Dawley rats was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus, according to CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not classify as an acute dermal toxicant. CLP Classification: “Not classified”.

The above study is supported with another study conducted on rats for the test chemical. The study was designed and conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity profile of the given test chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days. Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. It was concluded that the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical, when administered to male and female Sprague Dawley rats was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibit acute toxicity by the dermal route.

Both the above studies are further supported with the study mentioned in authoritative database. The acute dermal toxicity study of the given test chemical was conducted in rats at the concentration of 3000 mg/kg bw. No mortality was observed in treated rats at 3000 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be >3000 mg/kg bw, when rats were treated with test chemical by dermal application.

Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Value:

2 000 mg/kg bw

Quality of whole database:

Data is Klimisch 2 and from report.

Additional information

Acute oral toxicity:

In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats and mice for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below –

Acute oral toxicity study was done in group of 5 male and female Carworth Farm Strain E SPF rats using test material. No mortality was observed at dose 5000 mg/kg bw. In clinical signs examination, substantial amounts of coloured material were excreted in the faeces. Hence, LD50 value was considered to be >5000 mg/kg bw, when rats were treated with test chemical orally.

The above study is supported with another study mentioned in publication and conducted on mice for the test chemical. The acute oral toxicity study was conducted in 4 - 5 male DDY mice by using test chemical at the concentration of 2000 mg/kg bw according to comet assay. The given test chemical was dissolve in physiological saline and administered as 0.5ml x LD50 or 2000 mg/kg bw in mice. No mortality was observed at 2000 mg/kg bw in treated mice. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be >2000 mg/kg bw, when male DDY mice were treated with test chemical via oral route.

Both the above studies are further supported with the study mentioned in secondary source for the test chemical. Acute oral toxicity study was done in rats using the given test chemical. 50% mortality was observed at dose 5000 mg/kg bw. Hence, the LD50 value was considered to be 5000 mg/kg body weight, when rats were treated with the given test chemical orally.

Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.

Acute Inhalation Toxicity:

The acute inhalation toxicity study need not be conducted because exposure to humans via inhalation route is not likely taking into account due to the low vapour pressure of the test chemical, which is reported to be 3.70E-42 mm Hg. Thus, exposure to inhalable dust, mist and vapour of the chemical is highly unlikely. Therefore this study is considered for waiver. 

Acute Dermal Toxicity:

In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below -

The reported study was designed and conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity profile of the given test chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days. Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. It was concluded that the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical, when administered to male and female Sprague Dawley rats was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus, according to CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that test chemical does not classify as an acute dermal toxicant. CLP Classification: “Not classified”.

The above study is supported with another study conducted on rats for the test chemical. The study was designed and conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity profile of the given test chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days. Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. It was concluded that the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical, when administered to male and female Sprague Dawley rats was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibit acute toxicity by the dermal route.

Both the above studies are further supported with the study mentioned in authoritative database. The acute dermal toxicity study of the given test chemical was conducted in rats at the concentration of 3000 mg/kg bw. No mortality was observed in treated rats at 3000 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be >3000 mg/kg bw, when rats were treated with test chemical by dermal application.

Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the above studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral and acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral and acute dermal toxicity. For acute inhalation toxicity wavier was added so, not possible to classify.