Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2017-11-13 to 2017-12-01
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Given the slight solubility of the test item it was diluted at 8 mM (4X) in treatment medium, 4% DMSO instead of 200 mM.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- activation of keratinocytes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis and tris and tetra{N-[(2-ethylanilino) or 2,4(or 2,5 or 2,6)-dimethylanilino]-N’-[(2-ethylanilino) or 2,4(or 2,5 or 2,6)-dimethylanilino] methaniminium} [phthalocyanine(bis and tris and tetra)sulfonato-κ4N29,N30,N31,N32]cuprate(II)
- Cas Number:
- 265115-84-2
- Molecular formula:
- C32H16-τN8Cu(SO3C17H22N3)τ
- IUPAC Name:
- Bis and tris and tetra{N-[(2-ethylanilino) or 2,4(or 2,5 or 2,6)-dimethylanilino]-N’-[(2-ethylanilino) or 2,4(or 2,5 or 2,6)-dimethylanilino] methaniminium} [phthalocyanine(bis and tris and tetra)sulfonato-κ4N29,N30,N31,N32]cuprate(II)
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
In vitro test system
- Details on the study design:
- Skin sensitisation (In vitro test system) - Details on study design:
Test system:
* Type of cells : Keratinosens TM
* Origine : Givaudan
* Culture medium : DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum, 0.05% geneticin - stored at 5°C ± 3°C
* Culture conditions : 37°C, 5% CO2.
* Mycoplasma statut: : no mycoplasma
* Passage numbers:
- repetition 1 : 24
- repetition 2 : 16
- repetition 3: 18
* Number of replicates per repetition
- for induction : 3 replicates
- for cytotoxicity : 2 replicates
Media
- Maintenance medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum, 0.05% geneticin - stored at 5°C ± 3°C
- Seeding medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum - stored at 5°C ± 3°C
- Treatment medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum - stored at 5°C ± 3°C
Controls
* positive control : Cinnamaldehyde:
* Negative solvent control: DMSO
Study course
- Cell seeding (first day)
*Cell seeding: 80%
* Cell density of the cell suspension : 8.10^4 cells/ml in seeding medium
* Seeding : 125 µl of the cell suspension at 8.10^4 cells/ml (i.e. 10^4 cells per well) were distributed in three white plates for the induction measurement and two transparent plates to assess the cytotoxicity.
*Incubation : 24 hours ± 1 hour at 37°C, 5% CO2.
* Number of plates : 5
- Preparation of the test item dilution (second day)
* Preparation of the test item stock solution: Given the slight solubility of the test item it was diluted at 8 mM, in treatment medium, 4% DMSO instead of 200 mM.
* Preparation of the positive control stock solution: concentration at 200 mM of positive control in DMSO. The solution is diluted to a concentration of 6.4 mM.
*Preparation of the 100 X plate (positive and negative control): 100-fold concentrated dilutions prepared in 96-well plate.
*Preparation of the 4 X dilution plate :
Test item: series dilutions prepared from the stock solution
positive and negative control: 100 X plate diluted 25 times in the 4X plate
- Contact between the cells and the test and reference items (second day)
Culture medium replaced with 150µL of fresh treatment medium
50 µl from the 4 X plate are placed in the different plates, then the plates are incubated.
Conditions of incubation
Time : 48 hours +/- 1 hour
Temperature: 37°C
CO2: 5%
Plates : covered with foil
- Luciferase activity (day 4)
Preparation of the plates:
Medium is removed after 48 hours and cells are washed with phosphate buffer saline
100µL of Luciferase substrate is added to each well
Incubation of the plates for 15 minutes at room temperature
Measurement in the luminometer:
* integration time : 2 seconds
- Cell viability assessment with MTT method (day 4)
Preparation of the plates:
Medium is removed after 48 hours and cells are washed with phosphate buffer saline
225 µL of MTT solution (0.6 mg/ml in treatment medium) is added to each well, then the plates are incubated.
Conditions of incubation
Time : 4 hours ± 30 min
Temperature: 37°C
CO2: 5%
Plates : covered with foil
After 4 hours, the MTT solution is removed and cells are lysed by adding 10% SDS overnight, in the dark.
After homogeneisation, the absorbances are measured at 540 nm.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Positive control : Cinnamaldehyde
Geometric mean EC1.5 = 16.19
Mean Imax = 3.55
Remark :A third assay was performed as in repetition 2, EC.1.5 was higher than the historical data.
All other validation criteria are met and validates the test.
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 1
- Parameter:
- other: IC 50 µM
- Value:
- 16.81
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 1
- Parameter:
- other: Imax
- Value:
- 0.47
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 2
- Parameter:
- other: IC 50 µM
- Value:
- 35.64
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 2
- Parameter:
- other: Imax
- Value:
- 0.51
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 3
- Parameter:
- other: IC 50 µM
- Value:
- 10.67
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 3
- Parameter:
- other: Imax
- Value:
- 0.89
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 1
- Parameter:
- other: IC 30 µM
- Value:
- 11.84
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 2
- Parameter:
- other: IC 30 µM
- Value:
- 16.11
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Run / experiment:
- other: Run 3
- Parameter:
- other: IC 30 µM
- Value:
- 0.98
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: For negative (solvent) control, the coefficient of variation was below 20% for all replicates
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: For repetition 2, EC1.5 was higher the historical data value. A third assay was performed. EC1.5 was on the range of the historical values dataset for replicates 1 and 3.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Positive control
Cinnamaldehyde |
4 µM |
8 µM |
16 µM |
32 µM |
64 µM |
EC1.5 |
Imax |
Rep 1 |
1,29 |
1,60 |
2,24 |
2,37 |
5,84 |
6,70 |
5,84 |
Rep 2 |
1,14 |
1,10 |
1,29 |
1,49 |
2,26 |
32,53 |
2,26 |
Rep 3 |
0,96 |
1,13 |
1,36 |
2,00 |
2,54 |
19,48 |
2,54 |
Mean |
1,13 |
1,28 |
1,63 |
1,95 |
3,55 |
16,19* |
3,55 |
* geometric mean
Negative control
Control solvent |
CV % |
Rep 1 |
18,4 |
Rep 2 |
8,6 |
Rep 3 |
8,1 |
Test item
VIABILITY |
INDUCTION |
||||
IC30 |
IC50 |
Imax |
Linear EC1.5 |
EC1.5 Lin/Log |
|
Rep 1 |
11.84 |
16.81 |
0.47 |
- |
- |
Rep 2 |
16.11 |
35.64 |
0.51 |
- |
- |
Rep 3 |
< 0.98 |
10.67 |
0.89 |
- |
- |
Mean |
- |
- |
0.62 |
- |
- |
Geometric mean |
- |
18.56 |
- |
- |
- |
Imax < 1.5: no EC1.5 is determined
Mean Viability Percentage
Concentration µM |
0,98 |
1,95 |
3,91 |
7,81 |
15,6 |
31,3 |
63 |
125 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
2000 |
Rep 1 |
89,80 |
97,72 |
89,93 |
87,47 |
53,60 |
9,60 |
0,65 |
0,52 |
0,84 |
1,23 |
2,66 |
4,80 |
Rep 2 |
81,87 |
94,00 |
81,01 |
82,73 |
70,40 |
57,32 |
5,06 |
0,00 |
0,38 |
0,86 |
2,20 |
10,03 |
Rep 3 |
55,71 |
57,09 |
56,36 |
59,27 |
32,47 |
37,26 |
1,16 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
1,89 |
16,05 |
Viability |
75,8 |
82,9 |
75,8 |
76,5 |
52,2 |
34,7 |
2,3 |
0,0 |
0,1 |
0,4 |
2,2 |
10,3 |
Mean Induction
Concentration µM |
0,98 |
1,95 |
3,91 |
7,81 |
15,63 |
31,25 |
62,50 |
125 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
2000 |
Rep 1 |
0,46 |
0,44 |
0,46 |
0,38 |
0,47 |
0,47 |
0,05 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
Rep 2 |
0,51 |
0,47 |
0,35 |
0,33 |
0,37 |
0,29 |
0,13 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
Rep 3 |
0,89 |
0,73 |
0,61 |
0,55 |
0,52 |
0,46 |
0,33 |
0,01 |
0,01 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
Induction |
0,62 |
0,55 |
0,47 |
0,42 |
0,45 |
0,41 |
0,17 |
0,01 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
SD |
0,23 |
0,16 |
0,13 |
0,12 |
0,08 |
0,10 |
0,14 |
0,01 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
Student-t test
Rep 1 |
0,001 |
0,001 |
0,004 |
0,001 |
0,002 |
0,062 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
Rep 2 |
0,001 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
Rep 3 |
0,388 |
0,002 |
0,001 |
0,002 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
0,000 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- study cannot be used for classification
- Conclusions:
- Under the retained experimental conditions the test item may be classified as not sensitizer.
The test method KeratinoSensTM is considered scientifically valid to be used as part of an integrated approaches to testing and assessment, to support the identification of the sensitization potential of test item for hazard classification and labeling purposes. - Executive summary:
The test was performed to assess the skin sensitization potential of the test item in KeratinoSens TM cells.
Cells were treated with the test item at 12 concentrations from 0.98 to 2000 µM in DMSO, according to a geometric progression of ratio 2.
Another group of cells were treated with the positive control (cinnamaldehyde) at 5 concentrations from 4 to 64 µM according to a geometric progression of ratio 2.
A further group of cells were treated with DMSO (1% in treatment medium).
The study was composed of three different repetitions, with 3 replicates for the measurement of induction and 2 replicates for the measurement of cytotoxicity for each repetition. Induction and cytotoxicity were determined after a cell treatment period of 48 hours with the test item, positive and negative controls.
The experimental protocol was established according to the O.E.C.D GuidelineNo 442-D, dated February, 04th, 2015 and the ECVAM DB-ALM protocol 155:KeratinoSensTM.
For viability the geometric mean of the IC 50 is 18.56.
In both repetitions, Imax are lower than 1.5, and no EC1.5 is determined.
Under the retained experimental conditions the test item may be classified as not sensitizer.
The test method KeratinoSensTM is considered scientifically valid to be used as part of an integrated approaches to testing and assessment, to support the identification of the sensitization potential of test item for hazard classification and labeling purposes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.