Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20 July 2016 to 14 October 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Test Data for Registration of Agricultural Chemicals, 12 Nohsan No. 8147, Guideline 2-1-19-1, Agricultural Production Bureau, November 24, 2000
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
dimethyl hydrogen phosphorate, compound with 4-tetrapropyleneaniline {SIDSep} Phosphoric acid, monomethyl ester, compd. with 4-tetrapropylenebenzenamine (1:1)
Molecular formula:
N/A
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl hydrogen phosphorate, compound with 4-tetrapropyleneaniline {SIDSep} Phosphoric acid, monomethyl ester, compd. with 4-tetrapropylenebenzenamine (1:1)
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
Physical Appearance: dark amber, viscous paste
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity: 98.99%
- Description: Brown paste

Method

Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The highest concentration of Butyl phosphate compds. with branched alkyl carbomonocyclic amine (Oil free) tested in this study was 50 mg/mL in the chosen vehicle, which provided a final concentration of 5000 μg/plate. This is the standard limit concentration recommended in the regulatory guidelines that this assay follows. The highest concentration in each test was diluted with DMSO to produce a series of lower concentrations, separated by approximately half-log10 intervals.
Vehicle / solvent:
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Evaluation criteria:
If exposure to a test material produces a reproducible increase in mean revertant colony numbers of at least twice (three times in the case of strains TA1535 and TA1537) that of the concurrent vehicle controls, with some evidence of a positive concentration-response relationship, it is considered to exhibit mutagenic activity in this test system.

If exposure to a test material does not produce a reproducible increase in mean revertant colony numbers, it is considered to show no evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system.
Statistics:
Not performed.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test material showed no evidence of mutagenic activity under the test conditions of this test.
Executive summary:

A reverse mutation assay was performed to the standardized guideline OECD 471 under GLP conditions. Salmonella typhimurium, strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100, and a tryptophan-dependent mutant of Escherichia coli, strain WP2 uvrA (pKM101), were exposed to the test material.

 

Two independent mutation tests were performed in the presence and absence of liver preparations (S9 mix) from rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone. The first test was a standard plate incorporation assay; the second included a pre-incubation stage. Concentrations of the test material up to 5000 μg/plate were tested. This is the standard limit concentration recommended in the regulatory guidelines that this assay follows. Other concentrations used were a series of ca half-log10 dilutions of the highest concentration. In the first test, toxicity (observed as a reduction in revertant colony numbers) was seen in strain TA98 at 150 μg/plate and above in the absence of S9 mix, and in strain TA100 at 5000 μg/plate in the presence of S9 mix. In the second test, toxicity (observed as a reduction in revertant colony numbers) as seen in strain TA98 at 1500 μg/plate and above, and TA100 at 150 μg/plate and above in the absence of S9 mix.

 

Precipitate was observed on all plates containing the test material at 1500 μg/plate and above in both tests and no evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any concentration of the test material in either mutation test. The concurrent positive controls verified the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolizing activity of the liver preparations. The mean revertant colony counts for the vehicle controls were within or close to the current historical control range for the laboratory.

 

It was concluded that the test material showed no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system under the test conditions employed.