Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 940-884-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1993-1994
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study well documented. Study meets generally accepted scientific principles. Study acceptable for assessment (see remarks in the result section)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Heavy metal accumulation in algae was examined by submersing polished plates of natural rocks and EAF C into Elbe water
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
The following analogue materials were used for the controls:
Granite
Diabase
Basalt - Radiolabelling:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- In 1993, 5 series of each 6 polished test plates (each one type framed in plastic frame) was exposed to Elbe water, starting on March 24, 1993.
Each one series of stone plates were sampled after 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10 w. Only the 10 w plate was used for bioaccumulation tests (the others were used for determination of the populations of sessile fauna and flora).
In 1994, the stone plates were polished and again exposed to Elbe water, starting on April 13, 1994.
Each one series of stone plates were sampled on
1994-06-21,
1994-07-19,
1994-08-17,
1994-09-14, and
1994-10-04 (2 series, reported as mean of each 2 plates). - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation of test solutions, spiked fish food or sediment:
- The water depth was constant since plastic frames with the stone plates were submersed into the water of the Elbe river from a floating raft at Bunthaus.
- Test organisms (species):
- other: autotroph (algal) community
- Details on test organisms:
- Natural algal communities developing on hard substrate surfaces
- Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural sediment: brackish
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- >= 0 - <= 24 wk
- Total depuration duration:
- ca. 0 wk
- Hardness:
- not reported
- Test temperature:
- not reported
- pH:
- 7.4-7.9
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not reported
- TOC:
- n.d.
- Salinity:
- n.d.
- Details on test conditions:
- ambient conditions reflecting the environmental situation of the early 1990ies
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- measured
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- The concentration of V in the filtered Elbe water was always below the limit of detection of 2 micrograms/L.
- Type:
- BAF
- Value:
- ca. 10 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body d.w.
- Remarks:
- 1993 Comparison of concentration measured for algae grown on EAF C plates in comparison to algae grown on natrual rock plates
- Time of plateau:
- 8 wk
- Calculation basis:
- other: final data (there was no plateau in the controls)
- Remarks on result:
- other: V concentration in mussels from contaminated waters (Elbe river in Hamburg) was approximately 1 mg/kg. V concentration in mussels from uncontaminated water bodywater (Gartow lake near Schnackenburg) was approximately 0.15 mg/L
- Remarks:
- Conc.in environment / dose:In Elbe river water, concentration was always less than 2 µg/L (micrograms/litre)
- Elimination:
- not specified
- Details on kinetic parameters:
- No kinetics reported in 1993. However, there are rapid successions of algae in the river water depending e.g. on climate
- Metabolites:
- not relevant in the context of slags
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not relevant
- Details on results:
- see below
- Reported statistics:
- part of the Annex to the report
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- Apart from V, algae grown on EAF C plates exposed to water of the river Elbe do no accumulate more heavy metals than algae grown on natural rock plates. V is only intermittently accumulated in algae grown on fresh EAF C stone plates newly exposed to the aquatic environment but is of no significance in the long-term behaviour of the slag.
- Executive summary:
Heavy metal accumulation in algae was examined by submersing polished plates of natural rocks and EAF C into Elbe water. In algal communities grown on EAF C plates in 1993, there was an increase in the V content to approximately 10 times the level of the algae grown on natural rocks within 10 w. In the second year of exposure, no accumulation of heavy metals occurred in algae grown on EAF C, and it became apparent, that the observed V accumulation was an intermittent effect without relevance for the long-term environmental behaviour of slag in the aquatic environment.
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: invertebrate
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1993-1994
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study well documented. Study meets generally accepted scientific principles. Study acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To elucidate the effect of EAF C leachate on V bioaccummulation Elbe water was enriched with slag leachate and led to mussels which were analyzed for heavy metals
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
not applicable - Radiolabelling:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- 15 mussels each were sampled after 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 d, both from slag leachate tank as well as from control tank
For water analysis, 100 ml of tank water were taken from each flow trough tank - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation of test solutions, spiked fish food or sediment:
- Elbe water was pumped into a settling tank to remove most of the suspended matter. Unfortunately, no filtration was done, and the suspended matter still in the Elbe water during incubation, was not measured.
- Test organisms (species):
- other aquatic mollusc: Dreissena polymorpha
- Details on test organisms:
- Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) with a shell length of 1.7 to 4.1 cm were used from the Gartow lake close to Schnackenburg (which is considered to be non-contaminated). During the exposure period mussels were not fed because the mussels were able to grow under the experimental conditions by filter feeding of supended matter
- Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural sediment: brackish
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- >= 0 - <= 56 d
- Total depuration duration:
- ca. 0 d
- Hardness:
- not reported
- Test temperature:
- not reported
- pH:
- 7.4-7.9
- Dissolved oxygen:
- not reported
- TOC:
- n.d.
- Salinity:
- n.d.
- Details on test conditions:
- 2 aquaria (flow through tanks each 45 L) were used to elucidate the effect of EAF C leachate on V bioaccummulation. Elbe water was pumped in a settling tank to remove most of the suspended matter. One half of this water was led through a column filled with 4.5 kg of EAF C to enrich the water with EAF C leachate. The other half of the treated Elbe water was used as a control without passage through a slag column. In both flow through tanks approximately 100 mussels were introduced, sampled after 1-56 d, and analyzed for heavy metals.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- measured
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- The concentration of V in the filtered Elbe water was always below the limit of detection of 2 micrograms/L. Suspended matter was not completely removed from the flow through water but from the analyzed water.
- Type:
- BAF
- Value:
- ca. 7 dimensionless
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Time of plateau:
- 8 wk
- Calculation basis:
- other: Comparison of concentration in mussels from contaminated waters (Elbe river in Hamburg) versus concentrations in uncontaminated water body (Gartow lake near Schnackenburg)
- Remarks on result:
- other: V concentration in mussels from contaminated waters (Elbe river in Hamburg) was approximately 1 mg/kg. V concentration in mussels from uncontaminated water body (Gartow lake near Schnackenburg) was approximately 0.15 mg/L
- Remarks:
- Conc.in environment / dose:In Elbe river water, concentration was always less than 2 µg/L (micrograms/litre)
- Elimination:
- not specified
- Details on kinetic parameters:
- In both mussel groups (exposed to slag leachate and controls) there was a rapid increase of the V concentration when the mussels from the uncontaminated lake were exposed to Elbe water
- Metabolites:
- not relevant
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Details on results:
- Slag leachate has no significant effect on the V concentration in these mussel within 56 d.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- The concentration of V was always below the limit of detection of 2 micrograms/L in the filtered Elbe water. Suspended matter was not completely removed from the test water but presumably from the analyzed water.
Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) exposed to Elbe water (controls) or to EAF C leachate in Elbe water for up to 56 d accumulated approximately 1 mg/kg of V in both slag leachate exposed mussels as well as in the control mussels. EAF C leachate has no effect on the V accumulation of the mussels. - Executive summary:
To elucidate the effect of EAF C leachate on V bioaccummulation, two aquaria were used in a flow through system. Elbe water was pumped in a settling tank to remove most of the suspended matter. One half of the treated Elbe water was led through a column filled with EAF C to enrich the water with EAF C leachate. The other half of the water was led in a control aquarium without passage through a slag column. In each aquarium approximately 100 mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) were introduced, sampled after 1-56 d, and analyzed for heavy metals.
Mussels exposed to Elbe water (controls) or to EAF C leachate in Elbe water for up to 56 d accumulated approximately 1 mg/kg of V. EAF C leachate had no significant effect on the V accumulation of the mussels. The concentration of V was always below the limit of detection of 2 micrograms/L in the filtered Elbe water. Suspended matter was not completely removed from the Elbe water before incubation but from the Elbe water before the start of the analysis. Thus, no information is available on the V uptake of the mussels from the Elbe water and its suspended matter, and neither a bioaccumulation factor nor a bioconcentration factor can be calculated.
Although EAF C may release V into the environment, its effect on the bioaccumulated V concentration in mussels is negligible under environmental conditions.
Referenceopen allclose all
In 1993, the content of iron and manganese of algae grown in Elbe water on EAF C plates, was doubled in comparision to algae grown on natural rocks. The V content of algae grown on EAF C was increased by a factor of 10 in comparison to other stone plates. Other heavy metal concentrations, e.g. Ag, Cd, Cu, Hg, and Pb, were not elevated.
In 1994, no heavy metal was accumulated in any algae growing on EAF C plates (see overall remarks).
Table 1. Analytical information on sessile algae exposed to Elbe river water while growing on polished stone plates in 1993
|
Ag |
Al |
Cd |
Cu |
Fe |
Hg |
Mn |
Pb |
V |
Zn |
Granite 1 |
2.2 |
17 |
5.1 |
81 |
11 |
2.87 |
3.3 |
97 |
30 |
0.83 |
Granite 2 |
1.6 |
16 |
3.9 |
70 |
12 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
68 |
25 |
0.75 |
Diabase 1 |
2.6 |
18 |
6.0 |
113 |
12 |
2.18 |
3.4 |
108 |
30 |
0.91 |
Diabase 2 |
1.9 |
17 |
4.6 |
85 |
12 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
74 |
30 |
0.84 |
Basalt 1 |
2.6 |
18 |
5.8 |
108 |
12 |
2.51 |
3.2 |
126 |
30 |
0.92 |
Basalt 2 |
1.9 |
18 |
4.9 |
87 |
14 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
88 |
35 |
0.89 |
EAF C non-porous 1 |
1.7 |
17 |
4.0 |
92 |
17 |
2.29 |
5.0 |
72 |
200 |
0.83 |
EAF C non-porous 2 |
1.7 |
19 |
4.8 |
116 |
22 |
2.3 |
5.8 |
102 |
280 |
1.04 |
EAF C porous 1 |
1.9 |
17 |
5.1 |
100 |
19 |
2.32 |
8.2 |
104 |
200 |
0.90 |
EAF C porous 2 |
1.4 |
20 |
3.6 |
109 |
25 |
2.3 |
11.0 |
147 |
400 |
1.00 |
Table 2. Analytical information on sessile algae exposed to Elbe river water while growing on polished stone plates in 1994
21.06.94 |
Pb |
V |
Cu |
Fe |
Mn |
Basalt |
49 |
22 |
202 |
11.6 |
1.40 |
Diabase |
51 |
24 |
198 |
11.7 |
1.40 |
Granite |
50 |
19 |
141 |
10.3 |
1.39 |
EAF C non-porous |
54 |
41 |
198 |
14.1 |
1.88 |
EAF C porous |
45 |
29 |
198 |
10.3 |
2.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.07.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basalt |
42 |
16 |
128 |
6.9 |
2.24 |
Diabase |
35 |
13 |
112 |
5.6 |
2.14 |
Granite |
40 |
15 |
91 |
6.9 |
2.29 |
EAF C non-porous |
51 |
18 |
132 |
9.7 |
2.48 |
EAF C porous |
53 |
20 |
142 |
8.6 |
2.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.08.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basalt |
110 |
12 |
125 |
4.9 |
2.31 |
Diabase |
33 |
14 |
109 |
5.9 |
2.15 |
Granite |
27 |
10 |
93 |
4.2 |
2.10 |
EAF C non-porous |
76 |
23 |
184 |
9.8 |
3.46 |
EAF C porous |
50 |
15 |
167 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.09.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basalt |
74 |
30 |
225 |
13.7 |
2.09 |
Diabase |
69 |
27 |
252 |
12.3 |
2.12 |
Granite |
61 |
24 |
213 |
11.5 |
1.93 |
EAF C non-porous |
94 |
31 |
299 |
16.4 |
2.65 |
EAF C porous |
39 |
14 |
183 |
6.7 |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04.10.94 |
Mean of two samples |
||||
Basalt |
58 |
21 |
119 |
12.3 |
1.58 |
Diabase |
62 |
22 |
110 |
12.7 |
1.94 |
Granite |
50 |
18 |
60 |
10 |
1.72 |
EAF C non-porous |
84 |
29 |
161 |
15.9 |
2.15 |
EAF C porous |
103 |
24 |
159 |
12.9 |
2.57 |
A bioaccumulation factor cannot be derived for V because these mussels feed on particulate matter suspended in the water column. The Elbe water was filtered before the analysis and was found to contain less than 2 micrograms/L of V. Thus, V uptake by suspended matter cannot be determined, and there is no possibility to estimate a bioaccumulation factor.
Description of key information
Bioaccumulation of trace elements released from slag, is negligible in the environment
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- BCF (aquatic species):
- 10 dimensionless
Additional information
Ferrous slags are inorganic UVCB similar to natural rock. These materials contain trace elements of toxicological or environmental relevance. The accumulation of these elements was tested in field studies. For several elements tested, there was a high scattering of their concentrations in animals and algae, including controls, but it could not be shown that a significant accumulation of these trace elements occurred.
The BCF 10 was taken as the worst case for heavy metals in aquatic environments to cover for the influence of slags in comparison to natural rock material
Since slags are inorganic UVCB similar to natural rock, there is no need to perform any study on bioaccumulation.
Rejected Study
To elucidate the possible bioaccumulation of trace metals released from slag stones used in hydraulic engineering, slags were exposed to Rhine water. Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda, Crustaceae), Bithynia tentaculata (Gastropoda), the mussels Corbicula fluminea and Dreissena polymorpha (Bivalvia), and the macrozoobenthos (sessile heterotrophes) were used to monitor bioaccumulation of trace elements which were assumed to be derived from slags. Basalt was used as control.
There were no data available for Dikerogammarus villosus, and there were in approximately 60 % of the measurements higher concentrations of trace metals (Cu, Pb, Cr and Ni) in slag-exposed organisms than in basalt-exposed organisms.
The author interpreted the data as evidence for relevant bioaccumulation:
Cu: As the control animals in contact with basalt had much higher Cu concentrations than the animals in the BOS (5-50 mm) baskets, it was assumed that there was an analytical error and the data were not taken into account for the overall assessment.
Pb, Cr, Ni: It was assumed that there was a relevant bioaccumulation in the bodies of the animals and in the sessile organisms on the slag-exposed organisms.
The interpretation of the author is not followed:
There was a large scattering in the concentrations of the 4 elements examined (Cu, Pb, Cr, and Ni). The concentrations of these metals in slag-exposed organisms were less than 1 % to up to 70 times the value of basalt-exposed organisms. The highest values were obtained in Bithynia tentaculata for Cr and in Corbicula fluminea for Ni. In both cases the bioaccumulation, as calculated from the ratio of concentrations in slag versus basalt-exposed concentrations, was high because the basalt controls were approximately one order of magnitude lower than in the other organisms. Taking into account that 40 % of the values of slags are lower than the control values, the data suggest that there was no significant bioaccumulation and there were no relevant differences between organisms exposed to slag and basalt.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.