Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
5.9 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
75
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
250 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
441 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Route to route extrapolation taking into account that oral and inhalation absorption are set at 10%

The corrected NOAEC = oral NOAEL *1/0.38*10/10*6.7/10= 441 mg/m3

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
the derivation of the starting point (NOAEC) already includes a factor for allometric scaling
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default value
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker exposure
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
based on a guideline study under GLP
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.167 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
300
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
250 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
50 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Route to route extrapolation taking into account that dermal absorption is set at 50%, while oral absorption is set at 10% (see toxicokinetic assessment) leads to the NOAEL of 50 mg/kg bw that is taken as starting point for the calculation of the DNEL.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
species tested is the rat
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default value
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker exposure
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
based on guideline study under GLP
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
8.7 µg/cm²
Most sensitive endpoint:
sensitisation (skin)
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
180
Dose descriptor:
other: EC3 --> LOAEL
AF for dose response relationship:
3
Justification:
EC3 is considered to be a LOAEL, default factor to extrapolate LOAEL to NOAEL
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
not applicable
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
not applicable
AF for other interspecies differences:
10
Justification:
default
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
default
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
AF for remaining uncertainties:
6
Justification:
3 for effects of the matrix; 2 as additional factor because no actual EC3 was derived
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
83 µg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
250 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
50 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Route to route extrapolation taking into account that dermal absorption is set at 50%, while oral absorption is set at 10% (see toxicokinetic assessment) leads to the NOAEL of 50 mg/kg bw that is taken as starting point for the calculation of the DNEL.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
The species tested is the rat
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default value
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
consumer exposure
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
Based on guidelines study under GLP
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
8.7 µg/cm²
Most sensitive endpoint:
sensitisation (skin)
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
180
Dose descriptor:
other: EC3 --> LOAEL
AF for dose response relationship:
3
Justification:
LOAEL to NOAEL default value
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
not applicable
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
not applicable
AF for other interspecies differences:
10
Justification:
default
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
AF for remaining uncertainties:
6
Justification:
3 for matrix effects; 2 for the absence of an EC3 value
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
17 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
acute toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
100
Dose descriptor starting point:
other: LD50/NOAEL
Value:
1 700 mg/kg bw/day
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
study in rat
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
default value
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
consumer exposure

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - General Population