Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-723-4 | CAS number: 127823-21-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018-06-21 to 2018-09-29
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 203 (Fish, Acute Toxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- There was a deviation from the study plan:
At the analysis of 2018-07-10, the concentration of the saturated solution was quantitatively analyzed with ion 148 due to wrong selection of quantitative ion, which deviated from the quantitative analysis method in study plan: select ion 80 as quantitative ion. Because the difference of two results was slight (22.2404 mg/L with selected ion 148 and 22.8415 mg/L with selected ion 80) and the concentrations of test solutions was finally quantitatively analyzed with ion 80, the deviation did not affect the quality or integrity of the study. - Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "Version / remarks"
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Method: GC/MS/MS
Analysis frequency: in 0, 48 hour fresh solutions and 48, 96 hour old solutions.
For the test groups of 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS, all fish were dead after 24h, therefore, to characterize the exposure concentrations truer, measurement of test item concentration in old solution of 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS was carried out at 24 hour. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- See "any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
- Test organisms (species):
- Danio rerio (previous name: Brachydanio rerio)
- Details on test organisms:
- See "any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Hardness:
- 180 - 190 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 22.4 - 23.2 °C (first definitive test)
22.8 - 23.4 °C (second definitive test) - pH:
- See "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Dissolved oxygen:
- See "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- For the nominal concentrations of 1.69, 2.13, 2.68, 3.38 mg/L and 40%SS, 50.3%SS, 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS, the mean exposure concentrations were 1.059, 1.194, 1.546, 1.948, 2.175, 2.539, 3.152, 5.255 and 7.795 mg/L.
- Details on test conditions:
- See "any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Details on results:
- See "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Sublethal observations / clinical signs:
Table 3. Water Quality and Physicochemical Measurements in the First Definitive Test
Concentration level
Items
0h
(Fresh)
24h
(Old)
48h
(Old)
48h
(Fresh)
72h
(Old)
96h
(Old)
Control
pH
7.66
7.28
7.15
7.49
7.07
7.05
D.O.
97.5
83.8
78.6
96.5
84.4
82.5
40%SS
pH
7.78
7.20
7.20
7.57
7.18
7.11
D.O.
96.2
84.1
79.2
94.3
86.9
81.9
50.3%SS
pH
7.78
7.29
7.18
7.58
7.26
7.19
D.O.
95.3
83.2
78.1
93.1
87.4
83.0
63.2%SS
pH
7.77
7.19
/
/
/
/
D.O.
94.2
82.4
/
/
/
/
79.5%SS
pH
7.78
7.27
/
/
/
/
D.O.
93.1
81.3
/
/
/
/
100%SS
pH
7.78
7.19
/
/
/
/
D.O.
92.3
82.2
/
/
/
/
Total hardness:
190 mg/L (as CaCO3)
Temperature:
22.4 ~ 23.2oC
Note: D.O., dissolved oxygen, %ASV.
Table 4. Water Quality and Physicochemical Measurements in the Second Definitive Test
Nominal Concentration (mg/L)
Items
0h
(Fresh)
24h
(Old)
48h
(Old)
48h
(Fresh)
72h
(Old)
96h
(Old)
Control
pH
7.94
7.60
7.31
7.66
7.43
7.28
D.O.
95.0
75.2
74.9
95.8
75.6
72.0
1.69
pH
8.14
7.69
7.41
7.80
7.52
7.31
D.O.
95.2
73.5
73.2
99.6
76.3
75.2
2.13
pH
8.18
7.69
7.42
7.79
7.53
7.30
D.O.
94.8
74.0
73.0
99.5
75.5
73.4
2.68
pH
8.21
7.70
7.37
7.87
7.57
7.32
D.O.
94.9
77.0
72.5
98.9
76.3
74.3
3.38
pH
8.22
7.71
7.39
7.99
7.63
7.35
D.O.
95.6
76.2
70.5
98.5
77.0
76.7
Total hardness:
180 mg/L (as CaCO3)
Temperature:
22.8 ~ 23.4oC
Note: D.O., dissolved oxygen, %ASV.
Table 5. Cumulative Mortality and Toxic Signs in the First Definitive Test
Concentration level
Geometric mean concentration
(mg/L)
Initial
Population
Observation Time
(h)
Cumulative
Dead Number
Mortality rate (%)
Toxic signs1
Control
< LOQ
7
3
0
0
7A
24
0
0
7A
48
0
0
7A
72
0
0
7A
96
0
0
7A
40%SS
2.175
7
3
0
0
7F
24
0
0
7F
48
0
0
7F
72
2
28.6
4F1FBL
96
7
100
/
50.3%SS
2.539
7
3
0
0
7F
24
0
0
7F
48
0
0
7F
72
5
71.4
2F
96
7
100
/
63.2%SS
3.152
7
3
0
0
7F
24
7
100
/
79.5%SS
5.255
7
3
0
0
4F3FBL
24
7
100
/
100%SS
7.795
7
3
5
71.4
2FB
24
7
100
/
Note: 1. A: no visible toxic signs, B: erratic swimming, F: discoloration, L: body overturning, /:no observation due to 100 % mortality.
Table 6. Cumulative Mortality and Toxic Signs in the Second Definitive Test
Nominal Concentration (mg/L)
Geometric mean concentration
(mg/L)
Initial
Population
Observation Time
(h)
Cumulative
Dead Number
Mortality rate (%)
Toxic signs1
Control
< LOQ
7
3
0
0
7A
24
0
0
7A
48
0
0
7A
72
0
0
7A
96
0
0
7A
1.69
1.059
7
3
0
0
7A
24
0
0
7A
48
0
0
7A
72
0
0
7A
96
0
0
7A
2.13
1.194
7
3
0
0
7A
24
0
0
7A
48
0
0
7A
72
0
0
7A
96
0
0
7A
2.68
1.546
7
3
0
0
7A
24
0
0
6A1F
48
0
0
7A
72
1
14.3
4A2F
96
1
14.3
4A2F
3.38
1.948
7
3
0
0
4A3F
24
0
0
4A3F
48
0
0
4A3F
72
2
28.6
3F2BF
96
4
57.1
3F
Note: 1. A: no visible toxic signs, B: erratic swimming, F: discoloration.
Appendix1. Table 5. Concentrations of Test Item in the Exposure Solutionin the First Definitive Test
Concentration level
Sample concentration (mg/L)
Arithmetic mean concentration in fresh media
(mg/L)
Arithmetic mean concentration in old media
(mg/L)
Old/Fresh
2018-6-25
2018-6-26
2018-6-27
2018-6-27
2018-6-29
0h-Fresh
24h-Old
48h-Old
48h-Fresh
96h-Old
Control
<LOQ
/
<LOQ
<LOQ
<LOQ
/
/
/
40%SS
3.6556
/
0.6076
4.8620
1.6819
4.259
1.145
26.9%
0.3%SS
4.8051
/
0.6285
5.7827
1.9296
5.294
1.279
24.2%
63.2%SS
5.5421
1.7924
/
/
/
5.542
1.792
32.3%
79.5%SS
6.5801
4.1961
/
/
/
6.580
4.196
63.8%
100%SS
10.6850
5.6863
/
/
/
10.685
5.686
53.2%
Concentration level
Geometric mean concentration of each renewal period (24 or 48h) (mg/L)
Mean exposure concentration over the whole period (mg/L)
0-24/48 hour
48-96 hour
40%SS
1.490
2.860
2.175
50.3%SS
1.738
3.340
2.539
63.2%SS
3.152
/
3.152
79.5%SS
5.255
/
5.255
100%SS
7.795
/
7.795
Note:For the test groups of 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS, all fish were dead at 24 h, therefore, measurement was carried out only at 0h-Fresh and24h-Old.
<LOQ,the response in control sample at the retention time of the analyte was <30% of LOQ and the result was expressed as<LOQ.
Appendix1. Table 6. Concentrations of Test Item in the Exposure Solution in the Second Definitive Test
Nominal concentration
(mg/L)
Sample concentration (mg/L)
Arithmetic mean concentration in fresh media
(mg/L)
Arithmetic mean concentration in old media
(mg/L)
Old/Fresh
2018-7-10
2018-7-12
2018-7-12
2018-7-14
0h-Fresh
48h-Old
48h-Fresh
96h-Old
Control
*0.3717
<LOQ
<LOQ
<LOQ
/
/
/
1.69
0.9978
1.0408
1.7934
0.6726
1.396
0.857
61.4%
2.13
1.1253
1.0940
2.0475
0.7970
1.586
0.946
59.6%
2.68
1.2930
1.2086
2.9230
1.1592
2.108
1.184
56.2%
3.38
1.6203
1.4872
3.6864
1.4890
2.653
1.488
56.1%
Nominal concentration
(mg/L)
Geometric mean concentration of each renewal period (48h) (mg/L)
Mean exposure concentration over the whole period (mg/L)
0-48 hour
48-96 hour
1.69
1.019
1.098
1.059
2.13
1.110
1.277
1.194
2.68
1.250
1.841
1.546
3.38
1.552
2.343
1.948
Note: *, the control sample may be contaminated during sampling or pretreatment.
<LOQ,the response in control sample at the retention time of the analyte was <30% of LOQ and the result was expressed as<LOQ.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Physicochemical Measurements in the Definitive Test
The results of pH value, dissolved oxygen, water total hardness and temperature are shown in Table 3 and 4.
In the first definitive test, the determined values of pH value, dissolved oxygen and temperature were 7.05 ~ 7.78, 78.1 ~ 97.5%ASV and 22.4 ~ 23.2oC, respectively. In the second definitive test, the determined values of pH value, dissolved oxygen and temperature were 7.28 ~ 8.22, 70.5 ~ 99.6%ASV and 22.8 ~ 23.4oC, respectively.
Dissolved oxygen and temperature were in the allowed range specified in ‘Conditions of exposure’. pH were within the allowed range: 6.0-8.5.
Verification of Test Concentration in the Definitive Test
The concentrations of test item were determined in samples of test media by GC/MS/MS method. The determined concentrations in old solution were not maintained in the range of 80% ~ 120% of initial determined concentrations, the mean exposure concentration over the whole period was calculated from the geometric mean concentration of each renewal period. For the nominal concentrations of 1.69, 2.13, 2.68, 3.38 mg/L and 40%SS, 50.3%SS, 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS, the mean exposure concentrations were 1.059, 1.194, 1.546, 1.948, 2.175, 2.539, 3.152, 5.255 and 7.795 mg/L.
See Appendix 1 Table 5 and 6.
Toxicity Signs in the Definitive Test
During the 96-hour exposure period, no mortality and other visible toxicity signs were observed in the control group and the measured concentrations of 1.059,1.194 mg/L, the fish exposed to the measured concentrations of 1.546, 1.948 mg/L showed mortality and toxicity signs such as discoloration and erratic swimming, 100% mortality occurred in the measured concentrations of2.175, 2.539, 3.152, 5.255 and 7.795 mg/L.
The results are shown in Table5 and 6.
Conclusion
According to the results and based onthe geometric mean concentration,the96-hoursmedian lethal concentration (LC50) (with 95% confidence limits)of the test itemtoZebra fishwas calculated by theTrimmed Spearman-Karber (TSK) method (EPA, VERSION 1.5) and as followed:
Test duration [hours]
LC50
(mg/L)
95 % lower confidence limit (mg/L)
95 % upper confidence limit (mg/L)
96
1.80
1.65
1.97
LC0(mg/L)=
Highest test item concentration with 0 % mortality after 96 hours
1.194
LC100(mg/L)=
Lowest test item concentration with 100 % mortality after 96 hours
2.175
Validity of the test
Parameter/Criterion
Results
Conclusion
First definitive test
Second definitive test
Mortality in the control group:
=1 fish at the end of the test
0 dead fish
0 dead fish
The test was considered as valid.
Dissolved oxygen concentration in test solutions:
=60% of ASV during the test period
78.1 ~ 97.5%ASV
70.5 ~ 99.6%ASV
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- According to the results and based on the geometric mean concentration, the 96-hours median lethal concentration (LC50) (with 95% confidence limits) of the test item to Zebra fish was calculated by the Trimmed Spearman-Karber (TSK) method (EPA, VERSION 1.5) and as follows:
96h-LC50 = 1.80 mg/L (95% confidence interval: 1.65 – 1.97 mg/L)
96h-LC0 = 1.194 mg/L
96h-LC100 = 2.175 mg/L - Executive summary:
A fish acute toxicity study was conducted with Zebra fish (Daniorerio) over a96-hourexposure period.
Based on the results of the preliminary test, a saturated solution with a loading amount of 100 mg/L was prepared to obtain diluted test solutions. In a first definitive test, fish were exposed to 5 concentration levels with a spacing factor of 1.26. The concentration levels were expressed as percentage of the saturated solution, i.e. 40%SS, 50.3%SS, 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS. The actual concentrations of the test solutions were measured by GC/MS/MS method. A concurrent blank control was performed in parallel. Seven fish were used for the test groups and the control group.After a 96-hour exposure period, all fish were dead in all 5 test groups, therefore, a second definitive test was carried out with 4 additional lower concentrations.
In the second definitive test, according to the result of the first definitive test, the average initial concentration of 40%SS was 4.259 mg/L, the definitive test was carried out with 4 additional lower concentrations, i.e. 1.69, 2.13, 2.68, 3.38 mg/L with a spacing factor of 1.26. After the saturated solution was obtained, the actual concentration of the saturated solution was measured by GC/MS/MS method. According to the determined concentration of the saturated solution, the test solutions were diluted from the saturated solution with test water. A concurrent control group was performed in parallel.
The test was performed with a semi-static system and the test solutions were renewed every 48 hours. Dissolved oxygen and pH were measured daily during the 96-hour exposure period in the control and test solutions. Temperature was monitored continuously by an automatic temperature monitoring system and recorded at 1 hour interval.
The concentrations of test item were determined in samples of test media by GC/MS/MS method. The determined concentrations in old solution were not maintained in the range of 80% ~ 120% of initial determined concentrations, the mean exposure concentration over the whole period was calculated from the geometric mean concentration of each renewal period. For the nominal concentrations of 1.69, 2.13, 2.68, 3.38 mg/L and 40%SS, 50.3%SS, 63.2%SS, 79.5%SS and 100%SS, the mean exposure concentrations were 1.059, 1.194, 1.546, 1.948, 2.175, 2.539, 3.152, 5.255 and 7.795 mg/L.
During the 96-hour exposure period, no death and visible toxic signs were observed in the control group and the measured concentrations of 1.059, 1.194 mg/L, the fish exposed to the measured concentrations of 1.546, 1.948 mg/L showed mortality and toxicity signs such as discoloration and erratic swimming, 100% mortality occurred in the measured concentrations of 2.175, 2.539, 3.152, 5.255 and 7.795 mg/L.
According to the results and based onthe geometric mean concentration,the96-hoursmedian lethal concentration (LC50) (with 95% confidence limits)of the test itemtoZebra fishwas calculated by theTrimmed Spearman-Karber (TSK) method (EPA, VERSION 1.5) as follows:
Test duration [hours]
LC50
(mg/L)
95 % lower confidence limit (mg/L)
95 % upper confidence limit (mg/L)
96
1.80
1.65
1.97
LC0(mg/L)=
Highest test item concentration with 0 % mortality after 96 hours
1.194
LC100(mg/L)=
Lowest test item concentration with 100 % mortality after 96 hours
2.175
Reference
Description of key information
The acute toxicity of the test substance to Danio rerio was determined in an experimental study performed in accordance with the OECD 203 test guideline and GLP requirements.
The 96h-LC50 was equal to 1.80 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 1.8 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.