Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-427-8 | CAS number: 140-67-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- other: activate the Nrf2 transcription factor by using the LuSens cell line.
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- This in vitro study is performed to assess the potential of the test item Estragole to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor by using the genetically modified keratinocyte cell-line “LuSens” (Bauch et al. 2012).
It employs the use of a reporter gene for luciferase placed under the control of the antioxi-dant response element (ARE) and hence monitors Nrf2 transcription factor activity. The measured endpoint is the up-regulation of luciferase activity after 48 h of incubation with the test substance at different concentrations. This up-regulation is an indicator for the activation of the Keap1/Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway (Ade et al. 2009, Natsch 2012, Natsch & Emter 2008, Vandebriel et al. 2010). In order to conclude on the Nrf2 transcription factor activity of the test substance, at least two, but a maximum of three independent and valid experiments are performed.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-allylanisole
- EC Number:
- 205-427-8
- EC Name:
- 4-allylanisole
- Cas Number:
- 140-67-0
- Molecular formula:
- C10H12O
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-methoxy-4-(prop-2-en-1-yl)benzene
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Appearance :Clear liquid
Composition :4-allylanisole
Purity :99.53 %
Storage :Room Temperature: (20 ± 5 °C), keep away from light
In vitro test system
- Details on the study design:
- This in vitro study evaluates the potential of the test item Estragole to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor by using the LuSens cell line. This test is part of a tiered strategy for the evaluation of skin sensitisation potential. Thus, data generated with the present Test Guideline should be used to support the discrimination between skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers in the context of an integrated approach to testing and assessment.
The assay included a cytotoxicity range finder test (CRFT) and two independent experi-ments (experiment I and II) with a treatment period of 48 h. The CRFT was performed to detect a potential cytotoxic effect of the test item. Based on the results of this test the con-centrations for the two experiments were determined.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- EGDMA (120 µM) was used as positive control. The viability was above 70 % and a dis-tinct increase in luciferase induction above 2.5 fold in comparison to the solvent control was detected.
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: experiment I
- Parameter:
- other: Relative Viability of the Cells[%]
- Value:
- 70
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Finally the following test item concentration showed a viability ≥ 70 % and could therefore be evaluated for luciferase induction: Experiment I: 135 µM, 162 µM, 194 µM, 233 µM, 279 µM, 335 µM, 402 µM, 482 µM, 579 µM
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: Experiment II
- Parameter:
- other: Relative Viability of the Cells
- Value:
- 83.3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Finally the following test item concentration showed a viability ≥ 70 % and could therefore be evaluated for luciferase induction: Experiment II: 135 µM, 162 µM, 194 µM, 233 µM, 279 µM, 335 µM, 402 µM, 482 µM, 579 µM, 694 µM, 833 µM
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- This in vitro study was performed to investigate the potential of Estragole to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor, by using the LuSens cell line. For this purpose, two independent experiments were performed.
A detailed listing of all measured and calculated values of the assay is given in annex 2 (values of CRFT), annex 3 (values of experiment I), and annex 4 (values of experiment II). In addition, the final results of both experiments are summarised in table 8-a and 8-b and graphically illustrated in figure 8-a to 8-d.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments. 12 concentrations of the test item were evaluated. The exposure time was 48 h. The following nominal concentrations of the test item were investigated in experiment I and II: 135 µM, 162 µM, 194 µM, 233 µM, 279 µM, 335 µM, 402 µM, 482 µM, 579 µM, 694 µM, 833 µM, 1000 µM
None of the real treatment concentrations in both experiments deviated more than 10 % from the nominal concentration. Precipitation of the test item was not visible up to the highest concentration.
EGDMA (120 µM) was used as positive control. The viability was above 70 % and a dis-tinct increase in luciferase induction above 2.5 fold in comparison to the solvent control was detected.
DL-lactic acid (5000 µM) was used as negative control. The viability was above 70 % and the induction of the luciferase was < 1.5 fold in comparison to the solvent control.
The induction of the luciferase of the growth control (Medium no. 3) was < 1.5 fold.
Since all acceptability criteria of the assay were met (see chapter 9.1) the study is valid.
In experiment I a cytotoxic effect was observed at the concentrations 1000 µM, 833 µM and 694 µM. Those concentrations were excluded from the final evaluation.
In experiment II only the highest test item concentrations induced a cytotoxic effect. Again, this concentration was excluded from the final evaluation.
Finally the following test item concentration showed a viability ≥ 70 % and could therefore be evaluated for luciferase induction:
Experiment I: 135 µM, 162 µM, 194 µM, 233 µM, 279 µM, 335 µM, 402 µM, 482 µM, 579 µM
Experiment II: 135 µM, 162 µM, 194 µM, 233 µM, 279 µM, 335 µM, 402 µM, 482 µM, 579 µM, 694 µM, 833 µM
Concerning the sensitizing potential, a substantial and reproducible dose dependent in-crease in luciferase induction ≥ 1.5 fold in more than 2 non-cytotoxic test item concentra-tions was observed in both experiments.
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did induce the luciferase activity in the LuSens cells above the threshold.
The recorded data in this study declare that the test item Estragole has the potential to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.