Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation, other
Remarks:
QSAR prediction
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
January 2016
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE: QSAR Toolbox version 3.3.5.17

2. MODEL (incl. version number). Database version: 3.8.3/3.1.2

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
[Explain how the model fulfils the OECD principles for (Q)SAR model validation. Consider attaching the QMRF or providing a link]
- Defined endpoint: Human Health Hazards; Irritation / Corrosion (HT Version 20120101phrasegroup_T46-1)
- Unambiguous algorithm:OECD principle 2.
Read-across from category members
Experimental values for the target chemical (if any) were not used in prediction calculations
- Defined domain of applicability: OECD Principle 3, the target chemical falls within applicability domain.
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity: The prediction is based on 5 neighbours' values, 4 of them equal to prediction.
- Mechanistic interpretation:Prediction confidence is measured by the p-value = 1.97E-10 (very strong confidence)

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
The target chemical FALLS within applicability domain
- Descriptor domain:similarity boundary.
- Structural and mechanistic domains: Target: Oc1ccccc1C(=O)Nc1ccc(O)cc1
Threshold=50%, Dice(Atom pairs;Topologic torsions;Atom centered fragments;Cycles)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: 50%
- Other considerations (as appropriate): The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= 1.86 and <=4.31. Thes are the parametric boundaries
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
(Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: QSAR Toolbox prediction based on read-across
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Osalmid
EC Number:
208-385-9
EC Name:
Osalmid
Cas Number:
526-18-1
Molecular formula:
C13H11NO3
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxy-N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)benzamide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
White or off-white crystalline powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SMILES : O=C(Nc1ccc(O)cc1)c2ccccc2(O)
Log Kow: 2.47

Test system

Details on study design:
Toxicity of the target chemical (not irritating) is predicted from category members using read-across based on 5 values (not irritating x4, irritating x1) from 5 nearest neighbours compared by prediction descriptors.
Category members are single chemicals or mixtures and are selected based on the profile of the target chemical. Only chemicals having experimental data are listed in the category.
The target chemical FALLS within applicability domain of the prediction.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: log Kow
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
Takes mode value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Time point:
other: NA
Score:
>= 0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Log Kow ≥2.47
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The prediction is based on 5 neighbours' values, 4 of them equal to prediction.
Prediction confidence is measured by the p-value = 1.97E-10 (very strong confidence)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Not irritating