Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 815-461-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 08 - 23 Aug 1996
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study period of 15 days does not meet the criteria of today standard methods recommending 21 days study duration. However, according to the Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R7.b (ECHA, 2012) the study can be regarded as valid for a long-term evaluation as corresponding criteria were fulfilled (e.g. 80% survival in the control, surviving females produce three broods in 21 days or less, > 60 brood neonates per female in the control on average). Thus all requested endpoints could be determined (time to first brood, number of offspring produced per female, growth and survival) and NOELR values for survival or reproductive endpoints could be calculated.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD guideline 202 "Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test and Reproduction Test", Part 2 (1993)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only 15 d test duration; Adopted in 1998
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: One set of final and initial WAF samples was collected on day 14 for chemical analysis. WAF samples (initial and final) of the control, the lowest (24 mg/L), middle (242 mg/L), and highest ( 2570 mg/L) were collected in duplicate.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: Generation of WAFs was carried out using a modification of the procedure developed by Anderson et al. (1974). Six individual WAF setups, one for each of the five exposure concentrations and one for control were prepared. An appropriate amount of test material was added to 2000 mL of Mobil Technical Center well water in each corresponding WAF aspirator bottle. Bottles were capped with parafilm and stirred for 20 h at room temperature. After stirring, the phases were allowed to separate for 4 h. 800 mL of the water phase were subsequently drained from the bottom spout.
- Differential loading: yes
- Controls: Mobil Technical Center well water without test material. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Source: The primary culture originated from Aquatic Research Organisms, Hampton, NH. The in-house culture had been maintained in the laboratory since June 19, 1996.
- Age of parental stock: Daphnids used for the test were less than 24 h old. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 15 d
- Test temperature:
- 19.3-20.5 °C
- pH:
- 7.84-8.41
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0, 24, 97, 242, 1018 and 2570 mg/L
Measured: Below the detection limit of 0.03 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 50 mL polystyrene cups with 40 mL of test solution
- Type (delete if not applicable): covered with a plexiglass sheet
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): every 48 h
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Mobil Technical Center well water
- Intervals of water quality measurement: at the beginning of the study and after every renewal period
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 h light and 8 h dark
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: immobilisation and reproduction - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 15 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 2 570 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF)
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Key result
- Duration:
- 15 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 2 570 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF)
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 15 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- >= 2 570 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF)
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Key result
- Duration:
- 15 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- >= 2 570 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF)
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of parent animals: 0%
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02 - 24 Aug 2011
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study with acceptable restrictions: The presence of neonates in the treatment group was not recorded on day 11.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Treatment, control
- Sampling method: Samples were taken from each new treatment WAF and the corresponding old solutions (three individual replicates) to determine the WAF concentration stability. The analysis was conducted at 4 different time points for both the new and old solutions during the duration of the test. Samples were collected in duplicate in 30 mL vials with PTFE lined screw cap lids with no headspace.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Samples were all analyzed on the day of collection so refrigeration was not necessary. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: A water-accommodated fraction (WAF) was tested. The WAF was prepared by adding the appropriate amount of the test substance to the dilution water in glass aspirator bottles using a plastic syringes. The syringes were weighed with and without the test substance to determine the actualloading rate. The vessels were sealed with foil-covered rubber stoppers. The solutions were mixed with Teflon®-coated stirbars on magnetic stirplates. The vortex was set at <10% (actual vortex = 7%) of the static liquid depth. The solutions were mixed for 24 hours (± 1 hour). The solution appeared clear, with bubbled test substance on the surface of the treatment during mixing and after mixing was stopped. At the end of mixing, the solutions were allowed to settle for 1 hour (± 15 minutes). At the end of the settling period, the WAFs were removed from the mixing vessel through the outlet at the bottom of the vessel and placed into 2 L volumetric flasks. 50 µL of Vita chem fresh formula was added to each flask and the test solutions were mixed for an additional 15 minutes prior to the distribution of the WAFs to the test chambers. New WAF solutions were prepared every 48 hours for the renewals.
- Evidence of undissolved material: No undissolved test substance was observed in any of the test chambers. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Source: Organisms were cultured in the Environmental Toxicology Laboratory, Annandale, USA. The original daphnid culture was supplied by Aquatic Biosystems Inc., Fort Collins, USA.
- Age of parental stock: < 24 h old, taken from 13-day old parents
- Feeding during test
- Food type: Vita-chem fresh water formula (Boyd Enterprises Inc.) and suspension of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Aquatic Biosystems Inc.)
- Amount: Vita-chem fresh water formula: 25 µL/L; Suspension of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata: 1.3E+08 cells/mL suspension
- Frequency: Vita-chem fresh water formula: Vita-chem feed was added to the treatment WAF before start of the test; Suspension of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata: 0.35 mL of the suspension were fed at inition of the test and during renewals. Beginning on Day 7, they were fed an additional 0.20 mL suspension on non-renewal days.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation conditions: Eight to ten daphnids were kept in 1 L glass culture beakers with approximately 800 mL of reconstituted water. The culture chamber was maintained at 20 ± 1°C under a 16 hour light 8 hour dark photoperiod (10 - 20 foot/candles, 108 - 215 Lux). Two sets of Day 0 cultures were started at least five days a week. Cultures were transferred every other day, with exceptions on holidays or weekends when staff was not present, the brood stock health was evaluated and any mortality, production of males or ephippia was documented as well as any mitigation procedures.
- Type and amount of food: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (approximately 4.5 - 6.0E+5 cells/mL). They were also fed 25 µL/L of Vita chem fresh formula mixed on a magnetic stir plate with the reconstituted water prior to feeding with algae.
- Feeding frequency: The culture was fed every other day or as needed based on observed algal clearing.
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): The neonates had <10% daily mortality on the experimental start day. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 170 - 178 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 20.4 - 22.4 °C
- pH:
- 7.63 - 8.45
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 6.69 - 8.88 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 135 mg/L loading rate WAF
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: bottles sealed with PTFE-lined caps
- Type: closed
- Material: glass; Size: 130 mL; Fill volume: 130 mL
- Aeration: dilution water was aerated prior to use
- Renewal rate of test solutio: The treatment and the control were renewed at approx. 48 h intervals using the WAF that were prepared approx. 24 h prior to renewal.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration: 10
- No. of vessels per control: 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: UV-sterilized deionized well water that is treated and distributed throughout the tesing facility via PVC and stainless steel pipes
- Total organic carbon: < 0.05 ppm
- Alkalinity: 117 mg/L as CaCO3
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Water quality measurements (pH, dissolved oxygen, hardness and temperature) were performed on a sub-sample of new WAF, and on old WAF composited from the replicates in each treatment and control twice weekly during the exposure period.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 hlight: 8 h dark
- Light intensity: Daylight intensity ranged from approximately 131.2 to 169.8 lux during full daylight.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: The daphnids were observed daily for immobilization, reproduction and abnormal behavior/appearance (body length) and the number of young were observed daily, but counted upon renewal. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- > 135 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (WAF)
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of parent animals: No mortality observed.
- No. of offspring produced per female: control: 112; treatment: 107
- Body length and weight of parent animals: There were no effects on growth, based on the average adult length measurement of 4.9 mm for the control and 5.0 mm for the treatment.
- Time to first brood release or time to hatch: control: 8 -10 days; treatment: 9 - 10 days - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The NOELR value for reproduction was determined using the Two-sample T-Test method.
Referenceopen allclose all
No effects were observed in the range of water solubility with an NOELR = 2570 mg/L (15 d) based on reproduction and immobilisation.
Table 1: Final total reproduction counts taken during the static renewal three-brood chronic toxicity study of the WAF of the test substance to Daphnia magna
Replicates |
Control |
Exposure Concentrations (ppm) |
||||
24 |
97 |
242 |
1018 |
2570 |
||
A |
89 |
107 |
102 |
125 |
109 |
112 |
B |
94 |
113 |
111 |
101 |
135 |
127 |
C |
115 |
123 |
129 |
120 |
88 |
68 |
D |
108 |
92 |
92 |
125 |
130 |
109 |
E |
124 |
122 |
127 |
100 |
123 |
118 |
F |
117 |
120 |
116 |
121 |
125 |
127 |
G |
115 |
98 |
0 |
124 |
142 |
129 |
H |
89 |
79 |
102 |
103 |
128 |
129 |
I |
114 |
128 |
136 |
102 |
79 |
116 |
J |
128 |
151 |
140 |
56 |
130 |
116 |
Totals |
1093 |
1133 |
1055 |
1077 |
1189 |
1151 |
Average |
109 |
113 |
106 |
108 |
119 |
115 |
Std. Dev. |
14 |
20 |
40 |
21 |
21 |
18 |
TOC analysis confirmed the low water solubility of the test substance in water. The total carbon content of the treatment is only slightly higher than that of the control. Thus, the results of the TOC analysis can not be used for the determination of an effect concentration. Thus, the effect concentration is related to the nominal concentration.
Table 1: Results of TOC analysis [mg/L]
|
New solutions |
|
Old solutions |
||
Test day |
control |
treatment |
Test day |
control |
treatment |
0 |
0.3005 |
0.4490 |
2 |
0.5506 |
1.0608 |
8 |
0.3127 |
0.3668 |
10 |
0.6724 |
0.4915 |
14 |
0.3976 |
0.4779 |
16 |
0.6451 |
0.7693 |
20 |
0.4448 |
0.5395 |
21 |
0.4143 |
0.4940 |
Table 2: Survival and reproduction of daphnids during the test in the control
Test day |
Number of live offspring released per replicate exposure vessel |
Cumulative daphnids immobilized |
Percent survival |
|||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|||
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
8 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
14 |
8 |
10 |
13 |
16 |
13 |
4 |
15 |
0 |
100 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
12 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
13 |
0 |
NC |
NC |
NC |
0 |
NC |
NC |
NC |
NC |
NC |
0 |
100 |
14 |
0 |
26 |
34 |
18 |
0 |
32 |
19 |
27 |
5 |
29 |
0 |
100 |
15 |
NC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
16 |
50 |
40 |
47 |
42 |
54 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
7 |
41 |
0 |
100 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NC |
NC |
0 |
0 |
100 |
18 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
19 |
0 |
NC |
NC |
NC |
NC |
0 |
NC |
0 |
0 |
NC |
0 |
100 |
20 |
1 |
28 |
23 |
23 |
41 |
28 |
31 |
19 |
55 |
28 |
0 |
100 |
21 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
NC: neonates present but not counted
Table 3: Survival and reproduction of daphnids during the test in the treatment
Test day |
Number of live offspring released per replicate exposure vessel |
Cumulative daphnids immobilized |
Percent survival |
|||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|||
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0° |
0 |
* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
90 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0” |
0 |
* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
90 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
0 |
* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
80 |
9 |
0 |
NC |
0 |
* |
0 |
* |
NC |
0 |
NC |
0 |
2 |
80 |
10 |
0 |
8 |
13 |
* |
16 |
* |
10 |
7 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
80 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
0 |
* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
80 |
12 |
17 |
27 |
24 |
* |
0 |
* |
21 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
80 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
NC |
* |
NC |
* |
0 |
0 |
NC |
0 |
2 |
80 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
* |
30 |
* |
0 |
0 |
32 |
28 |
2 |
80 |
15 |
NC |
NC |
0 |
* |
0 |
* |
NC |
NC |
0 |
0 |
2 |
80 |
16 |
46 |
38 |
44 |
* |
45 |
* |
38 |
46 |
43 |
0 |
2 |
80 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
0 |
* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NC |
2 |
80 |
18 |
41 |
34 |
2 |
* |
1 |
* |
33 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
2 |
80 |
19 |
NC |
NC |
NC |
* |
NC |
* |
0 |
NC |
NC |
0 |
2 |
80 |
20 |
2 |
9 |
31 |
* |
15 |
* |
0 |
38 |
17 |
9 |
2 |
80 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* |
0 |
* |
26 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
80 |
NC: neonates present but not counted
*: adult immobilized
0°: off-color, 0": off color and small
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 135 mg/L
Additional information
CAS 71010-76-9
Study using Decanoic acid, mixed esters with heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, pentaerythritol and valeric acid was conducted under semi-static conditions according to OECD 211 using Daphnia magna as test organism (Letinski & Bragin, 2011).The test solution was prepared by adding the appropriate amount of test substance with subsequent stirring and sampling of the aqueous portions (WAFs) through the outlet at the bottom of the vessels. A loading rate WAF of 135 mg/L (nominal) was applied in a limit test. No significant effect on reproduction was observed in the treatment throughout the test period of 21 d. Hence, the 21 d-NOELR is determined to be > 135 mg/L on the basis of the nominal test concentration.
CAS 11138-60-6
Long term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates was performed with the read-across substance fatty acids, C8-10 (even numbered), di-and triesters with propylidynetrimethanol according to OECD guideline 202 "Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test and Reproduction Test", Part 2 (1993) under semi-static conditions (Low, 1996). This test guideline is similar to OECD 211 which was adopted in 1998. The study period of 15 days does not meet the criteria of today standard methods recommending 21 days study duration. However, according to the Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R7.b (ECHA, 2012) the study can be regarded as valid for a long-term evaluation as corresponding criteria were fulfilled (e.g. 80% survival in the control, surviving females produce three broods in 21 days or less, > 60 brood neonates per female in the control on average). In addition, all requested endpoints could be determined (time to first brood, number of offspring produced per female, growth and survival) and NOELR values for survival or reproductive endpoints could be calculated. In this study Daphnia magna were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0, 24, 97, 242, 1018 and 2570 mg/L (prepared as water accommodated fraction, WAF). No effects were observed up to the highest test concentration resulting in a NOELR of ≥ 2570 mg/L based on reproduction and immobilization.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.