Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 224-403-8 | CAS number: 4345-03-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- concentrations for all test strains: 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 μg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 2-Aminoantracene, 4-nitro-o-phenyl- enediamine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- S9 in the S9 mixture (metabolic activation enzymes and cofactors from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1535 in absence and presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the mutagenic potential of the test substance according to Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. The test substance was examined using four strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1535). The test was performed in the presence and absence of S9-mix (Sprague-Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver S9-mix induced by Aroclor 1254). 5 concentrations were used for all test strains: 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 μg/plate. Positive and negative controls were included in the study. No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies could be observed at any of the treatment concentrations. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 97a, TA 98, TA1 00 and TA 1535 in absence and presence of metabolic activation (NTP, 1985).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- W-B1
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
without metabolic activation: 39.8, 49.8, 60, and 75 μg/ml
with metabolic activation: 400, 450, and 500 μg/ml
Experiment II:
without metabolic activation: 24.9, 30.1, and 35 μg/ml
with metabolic activation: 4100, 5000, and 6000 μg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was negative for genotoxicity in a chromosome aberration assay.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to investigate the mutagenic potential of the test substance in the chromosomal aberration assay. In the first trial, test substance concentrations of 39.8, 49.8, 60, and 75 μg/mL were tested without metabolic activation, and doses of 400, 450, and 500 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. In the second trial, concentrations of 24.9, 30.1, and 35 μg/mL of the test substance were tested without metabolic activation, and concentrations of 4100, 5000,and 6000 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. Vehicle (DMSO) and appropriate positive controls were used. Under the study conditions, the test substance was negative for genotoxicity in a chromosome aberration assay (NTP, 1984).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- sister chromatid exchange assay in mammalian cells
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: W-B1
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
without metabolic activation: 5, 7, 10, and 50 μg/ml; with metabolic activation: 30, 100, 300, and 1000 μg/ml
Experiment II:
without metabolic activation: 15.1, 19.95, 25.2, and 30.2 μg/ml; with metabolic activation: 202, 298.2, 396, and 497 μg/ml; - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cell harvest and fixation:
Two to three hours after addition of colcemid, cells were collected by mitotic shake-off and treated for up to 3 min at room temperature with hypotomic KCl (75 mM). Cells were then washed twice with fixative (3:1, methanol: glacial acetic acid, v/v), dropped onto slides, and ar-dried). - Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- other: weakly positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was weakly positive in a sister chromatid exchange assay in the presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the genotoxic potential in mammalian cells according to a sister chromatid exchange assay. Two trials were performed. In the first trial, concentrations of 5, 7, 10, and 50 μg/mL of the test substance were tested without metabolic activation, and doses of 30, 100, 300, and 1000 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. In the second trial, concentrations of 15.1, 19.95, 25.2, and 30.2 μg/mL of the test substance were tested without metabolic activation, and concentrations of 202, 298.2, 396, and 497 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. Vehicle (DMSO) and appropriate positive controls were used. Under the study conditions, the test substance was weakly positive in a sister chromatid exchange assay in the presence of metabolic activation (NTP, 1984).
Referenceopen allclose all
Concentration denotes the the percentage of S9 in the S9 mixture (metabolic activation enzymes and cofactors from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver) that was added to cultures.
Strain: TA100 |
||
S9 Activation |
S9 Species |
Concentration |
No Activation |
N/A |
N/A |
30% RLI |
Rat |
30% |
30% HLI |
Hamster |
30% |
10% RLI |
Rat |
10% |
10% HLI |
Hamster |
10% |
Strain: TA1535 |
||
S9 Activation |
S9 Species |
Concentration |
No Activation |
N/A |
N/A |
30% RLI |
Rat |
30% |
30% HLI |
Hamster |
30% |
10% RLI |
Rat |
10% |
10% HLI |
Hamster |
10% |
Strain: TA97 |
||
S9 Activation |
S9 Species |
Concentration |
No Activation |
N/A |
N/A |
30% RLI |
Rat |
30% |
30% HLI |
Hamster |
30% |
10% RLI |
Rat |
10% |
10% HLI |
Hamster |
10% |
Strain: TA98 |
||
S9 Activation |
S9 Species |
Concentration |
No Activation |
N/A |
N/A |
30% RLI |
Rat |
30% |
30% HLI |
Hamster |
30% |
10% RLI |
Rat |
10% |
10% HLI |
Hamster |
10% |
Trial #:1 Activation: No Activation Date: 03/01/1984 Harvest Time: 10.5 hour(s) Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs | ||||||||||
µg/mL | Cells Examined | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | ||
Abs | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | ||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Negative (Not Specified) | 0 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Test Chemical: | test sub. | 39.8 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
49.8 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
60 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Positive Control: | Mitomycin-C | 0.2 | 100 | 16 | 0.16 | 11 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 9 | 0.09 | 8 | 2 | 0.02 | 1 |
Mitomycin-C | 0.5 | 25 | 7 | 0.28 | 28 | 5 | 0.2 | 20 | 2 | 0.08 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Trend: | 1.337 | 1.804 | -0.453 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.091 | 0.036 | 0.675 | ||||||||||||
Trial #:1_S9 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 03/01/1984 Harvest Time: 10.5 hour(s) Trial Call: Test Failure | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs | ||||||||||
µg/mL | Cells Examined | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | ||
Abs | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | ||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 100 | 5 | 0.05 | 4 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Test Chemical: | test sub. | 1000 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Positive Control: | Cyclophosphamide | 37.5 | 25 | 16 | 0.64 | 40 | 3 | 0.12 | 12 | 13 | 0.52 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trend: | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Trial #:2 Activation: No Activation Date: 01/26/1984 Harvest Time: 10.5 hour(s) Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs | ||||||||||
µg/mL | Cells Examined | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | ||
Abs | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | ||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Negative (Not Specified) | 0 | 100 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 |
Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Test Chemical: | test sub. | 24.9 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30.1 | 100 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
35 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.04 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Positive Control: | Mitomycin-C | 0.25 | 100 | 19 | 0.19 | 15 | 8 | 0.08 | 7 | 11 | 0.11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mitomycin-C | 0.5 | 50 | 17 | 0.34 | 24 | 7 | 0.14 | 12 | 10 | 0.2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Trend: | 0.251 | -1.07 | 1.148 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.401 | 0.858 | 0.125 | ||||||||||||
Trial #:2_S9 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 01/11/1984 Harvest Time: 10.5 hour(s) Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs | ||||||||||
µg/mL | Cells Examined | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | ||
Abs | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | ||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Negative (Not Specified) | 0 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.03 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.03 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Test Chemical: | test sub. | 400 | 100 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.03 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
450 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
500 | 100 | 7 | 0.07 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.07 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Positive Control: | Cyclophosphamide | 25 | 50 | 16 | 0.32 | 22 | 6 | 0.12 | 10 | 10 | 0.2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cyclophosphamide | 50 | 100 | 12 | 0.12 | 12 | 5 | 0.05 | 5 | 7 | 0.07 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Trend: | 0.277 | 0 | 0.277 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.391 | 0 | 0.391 | ||||||||||||
Trial #:3_S9 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 03/22/1984 Harvest Time: 10.5 hour(s) Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||||||||
Dose | Total | Total Aberrations | Complex Aberrations | Simple Aberrations | Other Abs | ||||||||||
µg/mL | Cells Examined | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | No. of | Abs | % Cells | ||
Abs | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | Abs. | Per | With | ||||
Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | Cell | Abs | ||||||||
Vehicle Control: | Negative (Not Specified) | 0 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Test Chemical: | test sub. | 4100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5000 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
6000 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.02 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Positive Control: | Cyclophosphamide | 5 | 100 | 8 | 0.08 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0.08 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cyclophosphamide | 37.5 | 25 | 9 | 0.36 | 28 | 3 | 0.12 | 8 | 5 | 0.2 | 20 | 1 | 0.04 | 4 | |
Trend: | -0.188 | 0.474 | -0.448 | ||||||||||||
Probability: | 0.574 | 0.318 | 0.673 |
Trial #: 1 Activation: No Activation Date: 12/13/1983 Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||
Dose | Number | Number | Total | SCE / | SCE / | Hours in | % Increase | ||
µg/mL | Cells | Chromosomes | Number | Chromosome | Cell | BRDU | Over Solvent | ||
Examined | Examined | SCEs | Control | ||||||
Vehicle Control | Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 50 | 1026 | 468 | 0.456 | 9.36 | 25.3 | 0 |
Test Chemical | test sub. | 5 | 50 | 1003 | 484 | 0.483 | 9.68 | 25.3 | 5.79 |
7 | 50 | 1036 | 482 | 0.465 | 9.64 | 25.3 | 1.997 | ||
10 | 50 | 1005 | 479 | 0.477 | 9.58 | 25.3 | 4.489 | ||
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | ||
Positive Control | Mitomycin-C | 0.0015 | 50 | 1021 | 714 | 0.699 | 14.28 | 25.3 | 53.311 |
Mitomycin-C | 0.01 | 5 | 104 | 244 | 2.346 | 48.8 | 25.3 | 414.349 | |
Trend: | 0.587 | ||||||||
Probability: | 0.279 | ||||||||
Trial #: 2 Activation: No Activation Date: 01/11/1984 Trial Call: Negative | |||||||||
Dose | Number | Number | Total | SCE / | SCE / | Hours in | % Increase | ||
µg/mL | Cells | Chromosomes | Number | Chromosome | Cell | BRDU | Over Solvent | ||
Examined | Examined | SCEs | Control | ||||||
Vehicle Control | Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 50 | 1027 | 469 | 0.457 | 9.38 | 25.8 | 0 |
Test Chemical | test sub. | 15.1 | 50 | 1029 | 410 | 0.398 | 8.2 | 25.8 | -12.75 |
19.95 | 50 | 1029 | 487 | 0.473 | 9.74 | 32.8 | 3.636 | ||
25.2 | 50 | 1035 | 504 | 0.487 | 10.08 | 32.8 | 6.632 | ||
30.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | ||
Positive Control | Mitomycin-C | 0.0015 | 50 | 1037 | 662 | 0.638 | 13.24 | 25.8 | 39.79 |
Mitomycin-C | 0.01 | 5 | 102 | 264 | 2.588 | 52.8 | 25.8 | 466.763 | |
Trend: | 1.848 | ||||||||
Probability: | 0.032 | ||||||||
Trial #: 1_S9 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 12/06/1983 Trial Call: Weakly Positive | |||||||||
Dose | Number | Number | Total | SCE / | SCE / | Hours in | % Increase | ||
µg/mL | Cells | Chromosomes | Number | Chromosome | Cell | BRDU | Over Solvent | ||
Examined | Examined | SCEs | Control | ||||||
Vehicle Control | Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 50 | 1025 | 494 | 0.482 | 9.88 | 25.3 | 0 |
Test Chemical | test sub. | 30 | 50 | 1017 | 531 | 0.522 | 10.62 | 25.3 | 8.335 |
100 | 50 | 1024 | 561 | 0.548 | 11.22 | 25.3 | 13.674 | ||
300 | 50 | 1012 | 655 | 0.647 | 13.1 | 34.1 | 34.294 | ||
1000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | ||
Positive Control | Cyclophosphamide | 0.4 | 50 | 1012 | 734 | 0.725 | 14.68 | 25.3 | 50.492 |
Cyclophosphamide | 2 | 5 | 101 | 204 | 2.02 | 40.8 | 25.3 | 319.088 | |
Trend: | 4.986 | ||||||||
Probability: | 0 | ||||||||
Trial #: 2_S9 Activation: Induced Rat Liver S9 Date: 12/13/1983 Trial Call: Weakly Positive | |||||||||
Dose | Number | Number | Total | SCE / | SCE / | Hours in | % Increase | ||
µg/mL | Cells | Chromosomes | Number | Chromosome | Cell | BRDU | Over Solvent | ||
Examined | Examined | SCEs | Control | ||||||
Vehicle Control | Dimethyl Sulfoxide | 0 | 50 | 1012 | 538 | 0.532 | 10.76 | 25.3 | 0 |
Test Chemical | test sub. | 202 | 50 | 1024 | 618 | 0.604 | 12.36 | 25.3 | 13.524 |
298.2 | 50 | 1021 | 610 | 0.597 | 12.2 | 25.3 | 12.383 | ||
396 | 50 | 1017 | 730 | 0.718 | 14.6 | 25.3 | 35.021 | ||
497 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | ||
Positive Control | Cyclophosphamide | 0.4 | 50 | 1018 | 865 | 0.85 | 17.3 | 25.3 | 59.833 |
Cyclophosphamide | 2 | 5 | 104 | 226 | 2.173 | 45.2 | 25.3 | 308.765 | |
Trend: | 4.896 | ||||||||
Probability: | 0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: gene mutation
- Remarks:
- mouse Mutatect tumor model
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: RA study
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the section 13 for details on the read across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: mouse Mutatect tumor model
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: mouse Mutatect tumor model
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: C57BL/6 mice
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The mouse Mutatect tumor model is a transplantable fibrosarcoma developed as an experimental paradigm to study the contributions of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and the reactive nitrogen oxide species they produce on genetic instability. These subcutaneous tumors become infiltrated with leukocytes, predominantly neutrophils, which express inducible nitric oxide synthase, the principal source of reactive nitrogen oxide species. The number of neutrophils is strongly associated with the mutation frequency at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) locus in the tumor cells. When injected into mice, utatect cell lines engineered to express human interleukin 8 (IL-8) produce tumors with high levels of neutrophil infiltration and correspondingly high Hprt gene mutation frequencies. The high-frequency loss of IL-8 transgenecontaining cells that occurs in these tumors may be due to a combination of generalized genotoxicity and selective cytotoxicity against IL-8 –secreting tumor cells by neutrophil-derived reactive nitrogen oxide species. Additional evidence of an increase in reactive nitrogen oxide species in these tumors is the presence of protein nitrotyrosine.
Mutatect TM-28 cells, a clone that expresses human IL-8, were injected subcutaneously into 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice (typically 9 per group; Charles River Laboratories, Quebec, Canada). Tumors were harvested when they reached 1 cm in size (typically at 2.5 to 3 weeks after injection). Dietary vitamin E supplements (0, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg body weight per day) were added to the tocopherol-stripped rodent pellets that were fed to the mice from 7 days before injection of tumor cells until the mice were killed and their tumors harvested (i.e., a total of 3.5 to 4 weeks). Dietary supplementation with tocopherol had no observable effects on tumor volumes or on mouse behavior or survival (data not shown). The cellular fractions of the tumors were analyzed for Hprt gene mutation frequencies and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Details on exposure:
- Experiments:
I - Hprt gene mutation frequencies - increasing doses of the test substance on Hprt gene mutation frequency in cells isolated from Mutatect TM-28 tumors
II - effects of dietary tocopherol on the number of neutrophils in tumors – measurement of the activity of MPO, a neutrophil-specific marker in single-cell and stromal fractions of Mutatect TM-28 tumors - Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Control animals:
- yes
- Statistics:
- Two tailed nonparametric tests were used for all statistical analyses. Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare three or more unpaired groups. Where P values were less than .05, we used Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test to compare values between two groups. The Analyse-it (version 1.65; www.analyse-it.com) was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Graphpad Prism (version 3; Graphpad Software).
- Key result
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- Results:
I - Hprt gene mutation frequencies:
- In two experiments, the Hprt gene mutation frequency decreased with increasing test substance dose.
- Nonparametric two-factor (experiment [exp, random], dose [D, fixed]) Model III analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant difference in the overall Hprt gene mutation frequency between the two experiments (Scheirer–Ray–Hare Hexp = 12.2, df = 1, P<.001).
II - effects of dietary tocopherol on the number of neutrophils in tumors:
- There was a statistically significant decrease in MPO activity in the single-cell fraction with increasing dose of the test substance in two experiments. A statistically significant decrease in MPO activity was observed in the single-cell fraction of tumors from mice fed 50 or 100 mg/kg test substance as compared with mice fed 0 mg/kg test substance (Kruskal–Wallis pooled over experiment = 35.1, df = 3, P<.001).
- The MPO activity in stromal fractions was unaffected by the test substance at doses up to 100 mg/kg - Conclusions:
- Based on the results of the read across study,the test substance (both 50 mg and 100 mg) statistically significantly decreased mutation frequency and MPO activity. The test substance was therefore negative for genotoxicity in a Mutatect tumor model
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the potential of the read across substance to induce Hprt gene mutation frequency in mouse Mutatect tumor model. The Hprt gene mutation frequency is associated with the number of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils. An indirect measure of neutrophil number is expressed as number of 6-thioguanine–resistant colonies per 10E+5 clonable tumor cells, IL-8 transgene loss, and myeloperoxidase activity. Mutatect TM-28 cells, a clone that expresses human IL-8, were injected subcutaneously into 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice. Dietary vitamin E supplements (0, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg bw/d) were added to the tocopherol-stripped rodent pellets that were fed to the mice from 7 days before injection of tumor cells until the mice were killed and their tumors harvested (i.e., a total of 3.5 to 4 weeks when they reached 1 cm in size). The cellular fractions of the tumors were analyzed for Hprt gene mutation frequencies and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. The test substance was found to significantly decrease the mutation frequency and MPO activity. Under the study conditions, the test substance was therefore negative for genotoxicity in a Mutatect tumor model (Soo, 2004).
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: gene mutation
- Remarks:
- mouse Mutatect tumor model
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: RA study
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the section 13 for details on the read across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: mouse Mutatect tumor model
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: mouse Mutatect tumor model
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- source: Novartis, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: C57BL/6 mice
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- Dietary test substance was administered by diluting it in soy oil and adding the liquid to dry standard rodent chow (Charles River Laboratories). Animals were isolated, one per cage, to ensure that the pellet was consumed. Control animals were treated similarly.
- Details on exposure:
- Control animals: 0.45 IU of test substance per day from their standard chow (90 IU test sub./kg chow).
Test substance-supplemented animals received an additional 2 IU of per mouse per day (400 IU test sub./kg chow); they were estimated to have also received 0.50 mg of gamma-tocopherol and 0.25 mg omega-tocopherol from the 20 uL of soybean oil used as a vehicle. - Dose / conc.:
- 90 other: IU test sub./kg chow
- Remarks:
- control animals
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 other: IU test sub./kg chow
- Remarks:
- test substance-supplemented animals
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Cells and culture conditions:
Mutatect cells were cultured in nonselective medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium with 10% fetal calf serum), HAT medium (supplemented with 100 M hypoxanthine, 0.4 M aminopterin, and 15 M thymidine), HT medium (without aminopterin), or 6-TG medium (supplemented with 50 M 6-thioguanine), as described previously. Before use, Mutatect cells were grown in HAT medium for 7 days to kill any pre-existing mutants, and then they were transferred to HT medium for 2 days to allow recovery from HAT treatment.
Mutatect tumor formation, detection of mutants, and myeloperoxidase measurement:
Tumors from Mutatect MN-11, MT-6, and TM-28 cells were established by subcutaneous injection of cells into the flanks of C57BL/6 female mice, 8–10 weeks of age. Tumors were excised when they reached 1 cm in size (2–3 weeks, depending on the cell line); single-cell suspensions were prepared by gentle mechanical dispersion of the tumor fragments with a plastic syringe. Tumor cells were established in culture for 2–4 days, and the frequency of mutations arising in vivo was then estimated from the number of colonies capable of growth in 6-TG medium, as described earlier. Mutation frequency is expressed as the number of 6-thioguanine-resistant colonies per 1+E5 clonable tumor cells. The same tumor cell suspension was also used for measurement of myeloperoxidase activity, a marker of neutrophil infiltration.
Vitamin E supplements to the diet:
Test substance supplements were started 7 days before tumor cell injection and were continued until the animals were killed (i.e., a total of 3–4 weeks, depending on the cell line). Control animals received 0.45 IU of test substance per day from their standard chow (90 IU test sub./kg chow).
Test substance-supplemented animals received an additional 2 IU of per mouse per day (400 IU test sub./kg chow); they were estimated to have also received 0.50 mg of gamma-tocopherol and 0.25 mg omega-tocopherol from the 20 uL of soybean oil used as a vehicle. Control animals received neither vehicle nor supplementary tocopherol. Experiments were carried out according to guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The test substance determinations were carried out with the use of a HPLC method.
Induction of mutations by glyceryl trinitrate and by molsidomine in MN-11 tumor-bearing animals:
On day 12 after injection of MN-11 cells, mice received an intraperitoneal injection of either injectable glyceryl trinitrate or molsidomine. Control mice were given an injection of phosphate-buffered saline. Two days after treatment, tumors were recovered and established in culture as described above. Cells were cultured for 8 days to allow expression of the mutant phenotype before challenge with 6-thioguanine. - Statistics:
- Nonparametric tests were used for the statistical analyses. Two groups were compared by use of the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlation between two variables was determined with the use of the Spearman rank coefficient. All P values shown are two-tailed. A P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant, and a P value of <.01 was considered to be highly statistically significant. Confidence intervals (CIs) of median differences were calculated with the use of Analyse-it Version 1.5. Other statistical calculations were done with the use of GraphPad Prism Version 3 (GraphPad Software).
- Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- Effect of the test substance on spontaneous mutation frequency in MN-11 tumors:
- Supplementation of standard chow (which contains 90 IU test sub./kg chow) with 400 IU test sub./kg chow for 3 weeks reduced the median mutation frequency by 24.9% (P = 0.01).
Decrease in myeloperoxidase and mutation frequency by the test substance in TM-28 tumors:
- In two separate experiments, test substance reduced the median mutation frequency by 68.9% (P = 0.0019) and 84.1% (P = 0.011) and myeloperoxidase levels by 75.3% (P = 0.0002) and 75.5% (P = 0.026), respectively
- Dietary test substance afforded strong protection against both spontaneously arising and nitric oxideinduced mutations. Two separate protective mechanisms by the test substance may be operating: scavenging of a nitric oxide-related genotoxic species and altering the infiltration of neutrophils into tumors. - Conclusions:
- Based on the results from the read across study, the supplementation of standard chow with the test substance for 3 weeks reduced the median mutation frequency by 24.9% (P = 0.01) in MN-11 tumors. Additionally in two separate experiments, test substance reduced the median mutation frequency in TM-28 tumors by 68.9% (P = 0.0019) and 84.1% (P = 0.011) and myeloperoxidase levels by 75.3% (P = 0.0002) and 75.5% (P = 0.026), respectively
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the potential of the read across substance to induce Hprt gene mutation frequency in mouse Mutatect tumor model. In this study the mutatect cells were grown in mice as subcutaneous tumors for 2–3 weeks and then the tumor cells were recovered, and 6 -thioguanine-resistant (i.e., hprt mutant) colonies were scored. Myeloperoxidase activity was used as a measure of neutrophil infiltration in TM-28 tumors.Based on the results from the read across study, the test substance was found to reduce the median mutation frequency by 24.9% (P = 0.01) in MN-11 tumors. Additionally in two separate experiments, test substance reduced the median mutation frequency in TM-28 tumors by 68.9% (P = 0.0019) and 84.1% (P = 0.011) and myeloperoxidase levels by 75.3% (P = 0.0002) and 75.5% (P = 0.026), respectively. Under the study conditions, the test substance was therefore negative for genotoxicity(Sandhu, 2000).
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1.
Experiment I
group 1:
|
dose |
No. mice |
Hprt gene mutation frequency |
Difference (95% CI) |
0 |
7 |
1503 (1095 to 2158) |
0 (referent) |
|
25 |
8 |
1577 (0 to 2422) |
75 (−1296 to 752) |
|
|
50 |
9 |
26 (0.8 to 1011) |
−1477 (1700 to 1661) |
|
100 |
7 |
14 (4 to 79) |
−1488 (1273 to 1662) |
group 2:
|
dose |
No. mice |
Hprt gene mutation frequency |
Difference (95% CI) |
0 |
7 |
65 (7 to 129) |
0 (referent) |
|
25 |
8 |
14 (0 to 102) |
−51 (1 to 92) |
|
50 |
8 |
10 (3 to 35) |
−55 (15 to 94) |
|
100 |
8 |
5 (2 to 25) |
−60 (24 to 101) |
Experiment II
group 1:
Dose |
Myeloperoxidase activity |
Difference (95% CI) |
0 |
271 (197 to 535) |
0 (referent) |
25 |
115 (22 to 235) |
−156 (55 to 321) |
50 |
19 (4 to 105) |
−252 (177 to 428) |
100 |
7 (0.7 to 12) |
−264 (194 to 428) |
group 2:
dose |
|
|
Myeloperoxidase activity |
Difference (95% CI) |
0 |
|
|
249 (6 to 305) |
0 (referent) |
25 |
|
|
180 (67 to 225) |
−69 (12 to 189) |
50 |
|
|
12 (2 to 68) |
−237 (150 to 286) |
100 |
|
|
13 (7 to 124) |
−236 (116 to 281) |
Same number of mices was used as in above experiment I
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Study 1:
A study was conducted to determine the mutagenic potential of the test substance according to Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. The test substance was examined using four strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1535). The test was performed in the presence and absence of S9-mix (Sprague-Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver S9-mix induced by Aroclor 1254). 5 concentrations were used for all test strains: 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 μg/plate. Positive and negative controls were included in the study. No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies could be observed at any of the treatment concentrations. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 97a, TA 98, TA1 00 and TA 1535 in absence and presence of metabolic activation (NTP, 1985).
Study 2:
A study was conducted to determine the genotoxic potential in mammalian cells according to a sister chromatid exchange assay. Two trials were performed. In the first trial, concentrations of 5, 7, 10, and 50 μg/mL of the test substance were tested without metabolic activation, and doses of 30, 100, 300, and 1000 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. In the second trial, concentrations of 15.1, 19.95, 25.2, and 30.2 μg/mL of the test substance were tested without metabolic activation, and concentrations of 202, 298.2, 396, and 497 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. Vehicle (DMSO) and appropriate positive controls were used. Under the study conditions, the test substance was weakly positive in a sister chromatid exchange assay in the presence of metabolic activation (NTP, 1984).
Study 3:
A study was conducted to investigate the mutagenic potential of the test substance in the chromosomal aberration assay. In the first trial, test substance concentrations of 39.8, 49.8, 60, and 75 μg/mL were tested without metabolic activation, and doses of 400, 450, and 500 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. In the second trial, concentrations of 24.9, 30.1, and 35 μg/mL of the test substance were tested without metabolic activation, and concentrations of 4100, 5000,and 6000 μg/mL were tested with metabolic activation. Vehicle (DMSO) and appropriate positive controls were used. Under the study conditions, the test substance was negative for genotoxicity in a chromosome aberration assay (NTP, 1984).
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Study 1:
A study was conducted to determine the potential of the read across substance to induce Hprt gene mutation frequency in mouse Mutatect tumor model. The Hprt gene mutation frequency is associated with the number of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils. An indirect measure of neutrophil number is expressed as number of 6-thioguanine–resistant colonies per 10E+5 clonable tumor cells, IL-8 transgene loss, and myeloperoxidase activity. Mutatect TM-28 cells, a clone that expresses human IL-8, were injected subcutaneously into 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice. Dietary vitamin E supplements (0, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg bw/d) were added to the tocopherol-stripped rodent pellets that were fed to the mice from 7 days before injection of tumor cells until the mice were killed and their tumors harvested (i.e., a total of 3.5 to 4 weeks when they reached 1 cm in size). The cellular fractions of the tumors were analyzed for Hprt gene mutation frequencies and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. The test substance was found to significantly decrease the mutation frequency and MPO activity. Under the study conditions, the test substance was therefore negative for genotoxicity in a Mutatect tumor model (Soo, 2004).
Study 2:
A study was conducted to determine the potential of the read across substance to induce Hprt gene mutation frequency in mouse Mutatect tumor model. In this study the mutatect cells were grown in mice as subcutaneous tumors for 2–3 weeks and then the tumor cells were recovered, and 6 -thioguanine-resistant (i.e., hprt mutant) colonies were scored. Myeloperoxidase activity was used as a measure of neutrophil infiltration in TM-28 tumors. Based on the results from the read across study, the test substance was found to reduce the median mutation frequency by 24.9% (P = 0.01) in MN-11 tumors. Additionally in two separate experiments, test substance reduced the median mutation frequency in TM-28 tumors by 68.9% (P = 0.0019) and 84.1% (P = 0.011) and myeloperoxidase levels by 75.3% (P = 0.0002) and 75.5% (P = 0.026), respectively. Under the study conditions, the test substance was therefore negative for genotoxicity (Sandhu, 2000).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity studies, the test substance does not require classification for genotoxicity according to EU CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
