Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-726-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
- negative: Ames test with S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvr A (met. act.: with and without) (OECD TG 471; GLP); cytotoxicity: yes
- negative: Mammalian cell gene mutation assay with mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (TK) (met. act.: with and without) (OECD TG 476; GLP); cytotoxicity: yes; read across from Quaternary ammonium compounds, Benzylbis(hydrogenated tallow alkyl)methyl, chlorides
- negative: In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test with V79 Chinese Hamster cells (met. act.: with and without) (OECD TG 473; GLP); cytotoxicity: yes; read across from DODMAC
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- May 30, 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his (Salmonella typhimurium strains), trp (E. coli)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6 and 100 μg
Pronounced cytotoxicity was noted starting at a concentration of 100 μg/plate in the preliminary cytotoxicity tests. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test item was not soluble in highly purified water or dimethylsulfoxide - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: 1st experiment: in agar (plate incorporation); 2nd experiment: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 - 72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered to show a positive response if
- the number of revertants is significantly increased (p ≤ 0.05, U-test according to MANN and WHITNEY) compared to the solvent control to at least 2-fold of the solvent control for the Salmonella typhimurium test strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and Escherichia coli test strain WP2 uvrA in both independent experiments.
- in addition, a significant (p ≤ 0.05) concentration (log value)-related effect (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient) is observed;
Biological relevance of the results should be considered first.
Positive results have to be reproducible and the histidine or tryptophan independence of the revertants has to be confirmed by streaking random samples on histidine or tryptophan-free agar plates.
A test item for which the results do not meet the above mentioned criteria is considered as non-mutagenic in the AMES test. - Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: not reported
- Effects of osmolality: not reported
- Precipitation: not reported
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- see attachment
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In the plate incorporation test and in the preincubation test, each carried out without and with metabolic activation, pronounced cytotoxicity (scarce background lawn and reduction of the number of revertants) were noted at the top concentration of 100 μg/plate, in all Salmonella typhimurium strains and in the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA [pKM101]. - Conclusions:
- Di-C12-18 alkyldimethyl ammonium chloride was not mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria according to OECD guideline 471 (1997) and EU method B.13/14 (2008), Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvr A were exposed to Di-C12-18 alkyldimethyl ammonium chloride in ethanol in concentrations of 0 (control), 0316, 1.0, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6 and 100 µg/plate in all strains in the absence and presence of mammalian metabolic activation (rat liver S9 mix). The assay was performed using the plate incorporation method (1st experiment) and pre-incubation method (2nd experiment; 20 min pre-incubation).
The test substance was tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. Pronounced cytotoxicity was noted at 100 μg/plate in in all strains.
The positive control items showed a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies of the respective test strain and confirmed the validity of the test conditions and the sensitivity of the test system. The results of the negative and positive control cultures were within the range of the historical data. Hence, all acceptance criteria are met.
No increase in revertant colony numbers as compared with control counts was observed for the test item in the Salmonella typhimurium and in the Escherichia coli test strains in two independent experiments without and with metabolic activation, respectively (plate incorporation and preincubation test).
Under the conditions of the study, the test substance was negative for mutagenic potential.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source and target substances have similar toxicological properties because
• they are manufactured from similar or identical precursors under similar conditions
• they share structural similarities with common functional groups: quaternary ammonium and saturated or unsaturated alkyl chains with comparable length (corresponding to scenario 2 of the read-across assessment framework)
The read-across hypothesis is based on structural similarity of target and source substances. Based on available experimental data, including key physicochemical properties and data from acute toxicity, irritation, sensitization (human) and genotoxicity studies, the read-across strategy is supported by a quite similar toxicological profile of all substances.
Therefore, read-across from the existing ecotoxicity, environmental fate and toxicity studies conducted with the source substances is considered as an appropriate adaptation to the standard information requirements of the REACH Regulation for the target substance, in accordance with the provisions of Annex XI, 1.5 of the REACH Regulation.
A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
4. DATA MATRIX
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 18 and 28 hours after treatment at 40 µg/ml without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative with and without S9
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source and target substances have similar toxicological properties because
• they are manufactured from similar or identical precursors under similar conditions
• they share structural similarities with common functional groups: quaternary ammonium and saturated or unsaturated alkyl chains with comparable length (corresponding to scenario 2 of the read-across assessment framework)
The read-across hypothesis is based on structural similarity of target and source substances. Based on available experimental data, including key physicochemical properties and data from acute toxicity, irritation, sensitization (human) and genotoxicity studies, the read-across strategy is supported by a quite similar toxicological profile of all substances.
Therefore, read-across from the existing ecotoxicity, environmental fate and toxicity studies conducted with the source substances is considered as an appropriate adaptation to the standard information requirements of the REACH Regulation for the target substance, in accordance with the provisions of Annex XI, 1.5 of the REACH Regulation.
A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
4. DATA MATRIX
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix ≥ 50 µg/mL at the 3-hour treatment; ≥ 10 µg/mL at the 24-hour treatment with S9 mix ≥ 100 µg/mL at the 3-hour treatment
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative with and without S9 mix
Referenceopen allclose all
Plate incorporation, without metabolic activation |
||||||
|
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli WP2 |
0.316 |
mean SD |
27.3 1.2 |
117.0 2.6 |
15.3 1.5 |
6.3 1.2 |
30.0 0.0 |
1.0 |
mean SD |
36.3 0.6 |
118.7 4.6 |
17.0 1.0 |
5.7 2.1 |
29.3 2.9 |
3.16 |
mean SD |
36.3 1.5 |
127.0 13.1 |
17.3 1.5 |
7.7 0.6 |
37.7 8.7 |
10 |
mean SD |
39.0 6.1 |
128.3 7.6 |
16.7 1.5 |
5.7 1.2 |
45.3 6.4 |
31.6 |
mean SD |
29.0 15.5 |
106.3 2.1 |
18.0 1.7 |
9.0 1.0 |
53.7 6.8 |
100 |
mean SD |
12.0 # 1.0 |
66.7 # 0.6 |
8.7 # 1.2 |
2.0 # 0.0 |
14.3 # 0.6 |
Negative control |
mean SD |
29.0 6.2 |
131.3 15.4 |
25.0 0.0 |
6.7 0.6 |
51.3 3.1 |
Positive control |
mean SD |
143.3 1.5 |
990.3 4.9 |
149.3 0.6 |
97.3 9.5 |
205.3 4.9 |
Plate incorporation, with metabolic activation |
||||||
0.316 |
mean SD |
33.3 1.2 |
143.3 17.0 |
17.3 2.1 |
5.3 2.3 |
42.7 2.1 |
1.0 |
mean SD |
26.7 5.5 |
131.0 15.6 |
20.7 7.4 |
7.0 1.7 |
45.7 6.4 |
3.16 |
mean SD |
33.0 4.6 |
128.0 22.3 |
17.7 0.6 |
7.0 1.7 |
47.0 4.6 |
10 |
mean SD |
25.7 2.5 |
131.0 2.6 |
17.7 0.6 |
7.3 1.2 |
41.3 4.0 |
31.6 |
mean SD |
31.0 7.8 |
129.3 3.2 |
16.3 0.6 |
7.0 0.0 |
39.0 14.4 |
100 |
mean SD |
12.7 # 1.2 |
68.0 # 3.6 |
8.3 # 0.6 |
2.0 # 0.0 |
14.3 # 1.5 |
Negative control |
mean SD |
36.7 0.6 |
120.7 2.1 |
17.0 1.0 |
6.7 1.2 |
48.3 12.1 |
Positive control |
mean SD |
145.7 4.0 |
980.0 30.8 |
152.3 10.4 |
85.0 17.3 |
184.7 35.9 |
Preincubation, without metabolic activation |
||||||
0.316 |
mean SD |
30.7 4.7 |
152.7 7.6 |
19.0 1.0 |
6.3 0.6 |
45.0 1.7 |
1.0 |
mean SD |
26.0 9.5 |
164.3 18.5 |
22.0 2.6 |
7.0 1.0 |
53.3 5.7 |
3.16 |
mean SD |
30.7 9.3 |
160.7 22.9 |
21.7 1.5 |
7.3 1.2 |
52.7 2.1 |
10 |
mean SD |
41.7 6.4 |
167.3 12.4 |
24.7 4.0 |
7.3 0.6 |
36.0 10.4 |
31.6 |
mean SD |
31.0 1.7 |
108.7 5.9 |
24.3 3.1 |
6.3 0.6 |
43.0 1.0 |
100 |
mean SD |
14.7 # 0.6 |
51.0 # 1.0 |
7.7 # 0.6 |
2.0 # 0.0 |
15.7 # 0.6 |
Negative control |
mean SD |
28.3 3.2 |
174.0 3.6 |
27.7 0.6 |
5.3 0.6 |
41.7 18.9 |
Positive control |
mean SD |
146.0 3.6 |
845.3 4.0 |
193.0 1.0 |
86.3 2.3 |
143.0 28.2 |
Preincubation, with metabolic activation |
||||||
0.316 |
mean SD |
30.7 3.5 |
139.3 24.6 |
25.0 4.6 |
6.3 2.1 |
50.3 1.5 |
1.0 |
mean SD |
26.3 4.7 |
138.7 28.5 |
23.7 4.6 |
6.3 2.1 |
54.3 4.2 |
3.16 |
mean SD |
29.7 5.5 |
111.7 1.2 |
20.0 0.0 |
6.3 1.2 |
57.7 1.2 |
10 |
mean SD |
29.0 4.6 |
122.0 4.6 |
22.0 3.6 |
4.7 0.6 |
54.0 7.0 |
31.6 |
mean SD |
23.3 3.1 |
109.7 2.1 |
21.0 2.0 |
8.0 1.7 |
44.7
0.6 |
100 |
mean SD |
13.7 # 1.5 |
59.3 # 8.3 |
7.3 # 0.6 |
2.0 # 0.0 |
15.3 # 1.2 |
Negative control |
mean SD |
31.7 9.0 |
177.3 33.2 |
22.7 1.5 |
7.7 1.5 |
49.7 1.5 |
Positive control |
mean SD |
137.3 5.7 |
830.3 16.2 |
153.0 13.0 |
80.3 5.5 |
159.7 3.1 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria according to OECD guideline 471 is available for the target substance Di-C12-18 alkyl-dimethyl ammonium chloride. A mammalian cell gene mutation assay, and an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test are available for the structurally closely related source substances Quaternary ammonium compounds, Benzylbis(hydrogenated tallow alkyl)methyl, chlorides and DODMAC, respectively. A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria according to OECD guideline 471 (1997) and EU method B.13/14 (2008), Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvr A were exposed to Di-C12-18 alkyldimethyl ammonium chloride in ethanol in concentrations of 0 (control), 0316, 1.0, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6 and 100 µg/plate in all strains in the absence and presence of mammalian metabolic activation (rat liver S9 mix). The assay was performed using the plate incorporation method (1st experiment) and pre-incubation method (2nd experiment; 20 min pre-incubation).
The test substance was tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. Pronounced cytotoxicity was noted at 100 μg/plate in in all strains.
The positive control items showed a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies of the respective test strain and confirmed the validity of the test conditions and the sensitivity of the test system. The results of the negative and positive control cultures were within the range of the historical data. Hence, all acceptance criteria are met.
No increase in revertant colony numbers as compared with control counts was observed for the test item in the Salmonella typhimurium and in the Escherichia coli test strains in two independent experiments without and with metabolic activation, respectively (plate incorporation and preincubation test).
Under the conditions of the study, the test substance was negative for mutagenic potential.
The source substance DODMAC as well was not mutagenic in a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria. The preliminary assay with or without metabolic activation showed that the test substance demonstrated a potent toxicity from 1000 to 2500 µg/plate in all Salmonella strains tested. Under these conditions, the dose of 1000 µg/plate was retained as the maximum dose tested for the mutagenicity assay in Salmonella strains. In Escherichia Coli WP2uvrA, the top dose was 2500 µg/plate.
No precipitate was observed in the petri plates when scoring the revertants at all dose-levels. Without metabolic activation, toxicity was observed at the dose level of 1000 µg /plate for TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 strains. In Escherichia Coli WP2uvrA, toxicity was noted at 2500 µg /plate. With metabolic activation, cytotoxicity was limited to the strain TA 1537 which exhibited toxicity at the highest dose-level of 1000 µg/plate.
No significant increase in the mean number of revertants was noted in the five Salmonella typhimurium strains and Escherichia coli tested in the presence of the test substance neither with nor without metabolic activation. It was concluded that DODMAC was not mutagen under the conditions of the study.
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
The potential for Quaternary ammonium compounds, Benzylbis(hydrogenated tallow alkyl)methyl, chlorides to induce mutations at the TK locus, was investigated in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. The test substance was tested in two independent experiments, both with and without metabolic activation. Approximately 0.5 x 106(3-hour treatment) or 0.15 x 106(24-hour treatment) cells/mL in 20 mL culture medium with 5% horse serum were exposed to the test or control items, in the presence or absence of S9 mix (final concentration of S9 fraction 2%), at 37°C. Since the test item was toxic in the preliminary test, the choice of the highest dose-level for the main experiments was based on the level of toxicity (decrease in Adj. RTG), according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines.
In the experiments without metabolic activation, the selected dose-levels were as follows:
2.34, 4.69, 9.38, 18.75, 37.5 and 75 µg/mL for the first experiment (3-hour treatment),
1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µg/mL for the second experiment (24‑hour treatment).
Cytotoxicity was observed. Following the 3-hour treatment, a marked to severe toxicity was induced at dose-levels ≥ 37.5 µg/mL, as shown by a 61-100% decrease in Adj. RTG. Following the 24-hour treatment, a marked to severe toxicity was induced at dose‑levels ≥ 6.25 µg/mL, as shown by a 80-100% decrease in Adj. RTG.
No noteworthy increase in the mutation frequency was noted in comparison to the vehicle control following the 3-hour or the 24-hour treatments.
In the experiments with metabolic activation, the selected dose-levels were as follows:
4.69, 9.38, 18.75, 37.5, 75 and 150 µg/mL for the first experiment,
2.34, 4.69, 9.38, 18.75, 37.5 and 75 µg/mL for the second experiment.
In the first experiment, a slight to strong precipitate was noted in the culture medium at the end of the 3-hour treatment at dose-levels ≥ 4.69 µg/mL.
Cytotoxicity was observed. In the first experiment, a severe toxicity was induced at dose-levels ≥ 75 µg/mL, as shown by a 88-100% decrease in Adj. RTG. In the second experiment, a moderate to severe toxicity was induced at dose-levels ≥ 37.5 µg/mL, as shown by a 49-100% decrease in Adj. RTG.
In either experiment, no noteworthy increase in the mutation frequency was noted in comparison to the vehicle control.
in vitro chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
In the Hoechst AG study (1989), DODMAC (90% active in isopropanol/water) was examined for its genotoxic activity in V79 Chinese Hamster cells. The induction of the chromosome aberrations after in vitro treatment was investigated in the presence and in the absence of S9 mix.
A preliminary cytotoxicity experiment was performed in order to select the appropriate dose-levels for the main experiment. The test substance produced a significant cytotoxic effect (reduction of plating efficiency) without metabolic activation from 50 µg/ml up to a concentration of 200 µg/ml which was the limit of solubility.
In the main experiment, two independent cell cultures with and without metabolic activation (S9 -mix) were used with the dose-levels of 4, 20 and 40 µg/ml in the absence of metabolic activation and 5, 25 and 50 µg/ml in the presence of metabolic activation.
The test substance did not induce increase in the number of metaphases with aberration at any preparation time and dose-level.
A cytotoxic effect was observed 18 and 28 hours after treatment at 40 µg/ml without metabolic activation. Marked increases in the rate of chromosome aberrations were observed with the positive controls indicating the sensitivity of the assay.
In conclusion, DODMAC does not induce chromosome mutations (aberrations) in V79 Chinese hamster cells, neither in the presence nor in the absence of a metabolic activation system.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the target substance Di-C12-18 alkyl-dimethyl ammonium chloride does not need to be classified and labelled according to the CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 with respect to mutagenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.