Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-726-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial plants, other
- Remarks:
- short term and long term studies
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source and target substances have similar toxicological properties because
• they are manufactured from similar or identical precursors under similar conditions
• they share structural similarities with common functional groups: quaternary ammonium and saturated or unsaturated alkyl chains with comparable length (corresponding to scenario 2 of the read-across assessment framework)
The read-across hypothesis is based on structural similarity of target and source substances. Based on available experimental data, including key physicochemical properties and data from acute toxicity, irritation, sensitization (human) and genotoxicity studies, the read-across strategy is supported by a quite similar toxicological profile of all substances.
Therefore, read-across from the existing ecotoxicity, environmental fate and toxicity studies conducted with the source substances is considered as an appropriate adaptation to the standard information requirements of the REACH Regulation for the target substance, in accordance with the provisions of Annex XI, 1.5 of the REACH Regulation.
A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
4. DATA MATRIX
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- Sinapis alba
- Species:
- Triticum aestivum
- Species:
- other: Linum utisatissimum
- Species:
- Sorghum bicolor
- Species:
- Helianthus annuus
- Species:
- Avena sativa
- Species:
- Brassica rapa
- Species:
- Sinapis alba
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC5
- Effect conc.:
- 1 400 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Triticum aestivum
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC5
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- other: Linum utisatissimum
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC5
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Sorghum bicolor
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Sorghum bicolor
- Duration:
- 25 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2 530 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Helianthus annuus
- Duration:
- 25 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Helianthus annuus
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2 930 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Species:
- Avena sativa
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- germination
- Species:
- Brassica rapa
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Basis for effect:
- growth
Reference
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Short-term EC50 or LC50 for terrestrial plants:
- 2 530 mg/kg soil dw
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for terrestrial plants:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
No experimental data are available for the target substance Di-C12-18 alkyldimethyl ammonium chloride. However, plant toxicity studies are available for the closely related source substance DHTDMAC. A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
“The toxicity of DHTDMAC to plant seedlings was tested by Pestemer et al. (1991) in a loamy sandy soil (1.3% organic carbon, 9.9% clay, 54.3 sand, 35.7 silt). Seedlings with developed cotyledons were exposed for 14 days. Related to fresh weight reduction the most sensitive species was Sinapis alba with an EC5 of 1,400 mg/kg dry weight and an EC50 of 3,540 mg/kg dry weight. For Triticum aestivum and Linum utisatissimum the EC5-values were above 1,000 mg/kg dw. In a germination test DHTDMAC concentrations up to 3.2 g/l had no inhibiting effect on Lepidium sativum (Pestemer et al. 1991).
In another study (Windeatt, 1987) the influence of DHTDMAC (76.1% active ingredient = quartenary ammonium) on the emergence of plant seedlings and the early growth stages of Sorghum bicolor and Helianthus annuus were investigated. Potting compost with about 80% sand/gravel and 20% silt/clay including 4% organic matter was used as substrate. The highest test concentration of 10 g active ingredient of DHTDMAC per kg dry soil had no significant effect on the emergence of seeds after 7 days. After further 21 days the EC50 for fresh weight reduction of the seedlings was 2530 mg/kg for Sorghum bicolor and 2,930 mg/kg for Helianthus annuus (active ingredient in dry soil). 1,000 mg/kg was the highest test concentration with no growth effect. ForPhaseolus aureusthe 28 d EC50 was > 10 g/kg.
Similar results were reported for Avena sativa and Brassica rapa (Stanley & Tapp, 1982, cited in ECETOC, 1993). Plant seedlings exposed after germination for 14 days showed no reduction of growth at 1,000 mg DHTDMAC/kg dry soil (OECD draft guideline, 1981, no further details available).” EU RAR, 2002.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.