Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-726-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source and target substances have similar toxicological properties because
• they are manufactured from similar or identical precursors under similar conditions
• they share structural similarities with common functional groups: quaternary ammonium and saturated or unsaturated alkyl chains with comparable length (corresponding to scenario 2 of the read-across assessment framework)
The read-across hypothesis is based on structural similarity of target and source substances. Based on available experimental data, including key physicochemical properties and data from acute toxicity, irritation, sensitization (human) and genotoxicity studies, the read-across strategy is supported by a quite similar toxicological profile of all substances.
Therefore, read-across from the existing ecotoxicity, environmental fate and toxicity studies conducted with the source substances is considered as an appropriate adaptation to the standard information requirements of the REACH Regulation for the target substance, in accordance with the provisions of Annex XI, 1.5 of the REACH Regulation.
A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13.
4. DATA MATRIX
See justification for read-across attached to IUCLID section 13. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Duration:
- 5 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.031 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- cell number
- Remarks on result:
- other: Water from White river: pH 7.3, 299 mg/L CaCO3, 68 mg/L suspended solids
- Duration:
- 5 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.03 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: extrapolated based on differences in QSAR estimation
Reference
Description of key information
EC50 = 30 µg/L, 5 d NOEC = 31 µg/L (read-across from DODMAC and DHTDMAC)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 30 µg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 31 µg/L
Additional information
No experimental data are available for the target substance Di-C12-18 alkyldimethyl ammonium chloride. However, toxicity studies in algae are available for the closely related source substances DODMAC and DHTDMAC. A justification for read-across is attached to IUCLID section 13.
Several references are cited in EU RAR, 2002:
“The toxicity of DODMAC for Selenastrum capricornutum and Microcystis aeruginosa in laboratory water was investigated according to an ASTM method (Lewis & Hamm, 1986). For growth reduction after 96h the EC50 was 0.06 mg/l for Selenastrum capricornutum and 0.05 mg/l for Microcystis aeruginosa (nominal concentrations; pH = 6.8 - 7.2, hardness = 131 - 146 mg/l CaCO3).
An algae study with DODMAC in filtered natural water of the Little Miami River, OH (5.4 mg/l total organic carbon, pH = 8.1 - 8.4, hardness = 171 mg/l CaCO3) was conducted by Versteeg & Shorter, 1993. ForSelenastrum capricornutuma 96h EC50 of 1.12 mg/l was derived for growth reduction (measured concentration) and the algistatic concentration was above 16.4 mg/l. In this study acidic methanol was used as carrier solvent, which had a growth stimulating effect on the algae.”
“The influence of different test media on the sensitivity of Selenastrum capricornutum towards DHTDMAC (71.4% active ingredient) was investigated by EG & G Bionomics, 1981 b,c,d. Laboratory water with a hardness of 20 mg/l CaCO3 (no further characterization) and algae nutrient enriched White River water (Indiana) of the following quality prior to autoclaving were used: pH = 7.3, total hardness = 299 mg/l CaCO3, 68 mg/l suspended solids, 0.2 µg/l MBAS) In laboratory water a NOEC of 0.078 mg/l and an algistatic concentration of 0.228 mg/l were derived for the reduction of cell number after 5 days (nominal concentrations of active ingredient). The corresponding values for the river water were: NOEC = 0.062 mg/l and algistatic concentration = 0.708 mg/l. The table shows that results for Microcystis aeruginosa are similar (EG & G Bionomics, 1981 b,c,d).” (EU RAR, 2002)
Selenastrum capricornutum
|
5d NOEC 5d EC100 5d NOEC 5d EC100
|
0.078 mg/l 0.228 mg/l 0.062 mg/l 0.708 mg/l nominal conc. |
laboratory water " river water "
|
Microcystis aeruginosa
|
5d NOEC 5d EC100 5d NOEC 5d EC100
|
0.13 mg/l 0.32 mg/l 0.078 mg/l 0.21 mg/l nominal conc. |
laboratory water " river water "
|
The target and the source substances have a low water solubility and form complexes with dissolved organics, especially with anionic compounds. Thus, results with natural river water are considered more realistic and more relevant than the results obtained with laboratory water.
For classification and labelling purposes the 96h EC50 of 1.12 mg/L obtained in the river water study conducted with DODMAC cannot be used, as in this study acidic methanol was used as vehicle, which had a growth stimulating effect on the algae. Thus, the EC50 of 0.06 mg/L for Selenastrum capricornutum was used, although this study was conducted in laboratory water.
From the QSAR data on short-term toxicity to fish and Daphnia (no model is available for algae) it was deduced, that the target substance should be expected to be more toxic than the source substances DODMAC and DHTDMAC, and a factor of approx. 2 should be applied to the EC50 and NOEC obtained in this study. Thus, the EC50 and NOEC of the target substance Di-C12-18 alkyldimethyl ammonium chloride are considered to be 0.03 and 0.031 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.