Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 820-225-5 | CAS number: 101747-77-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Short-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH
Please refer also to the read-across statement attached in section 13
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The target and the source substances are structurally similar substances that share the common organometallic core structure consisting of a central zinc metal bonded to four alkyldithiophosphate esters (ligands) by coordinate covalent bonds -Zn[(S2P(OR)2]2. Structural variations between the target and the source substances are related only to the alkyl (R) groups of the alkyldithiophosphate ligands. The substances in this category give thus rise to an (identical) common compound Phosphorodithioic acid moiety that can be released by the breakage of ester bonds and dissociation from the Zinc complex to which the organism would be exposed if the target substance was tested in the toxicity studies. Exposure to the parent compounds (non-transformed constituents) and to the counter alkyl alcohols, possibly released by hydrolysis of P-O bonds – non-common compounds – would not influence the prediction of the (eco)toxicological properties because they are considered to have the same biological targets and to cause the same type of effects through a common underlying mechanism due to the same functional groups (zinc cation, phosphorodithioic cation and aliphatic alcohol anionic moieties). The impurities of the target and the source substances are not expected to impact the prediction because they are identical or, if slightly structural different, belong to the same class of compounds with the same functional groups and their percentages are very low.
2. CATEGORY APPROACH JUSTIFICATION (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The aquatic toxicity of the ZDDP category members is mainly influenced by the molecular weight (depends on the length of alkyl rests) and the water solubility. Numerous studies demonstrate decreasing toxicity with the increased chain length. Since the alkyl rests in the target substance are shorter (isobutyl, isopropyl and pentyl) than that of the source substance CAS 4259-15-8 (ethylhexyl) and the water solubility is higher (40.7 mg/L vs 9.1 mg/L for the target and the source substance, respectively) a higher bioavailability is expected for the target substance when compared to source substance CAS 4259-15-8. Regarding the source substances CAS 68457-79-4 and CAS 84605-29-8, the water solubilities are with 1625 and 2764 mg/L above the one of the target substance. Therefore, these source substances are expected to be more bioavailable than the target substance. Thus, data on CAS 68457-79-4 and CAS 84605-29-8 can serve as worst-case data for the target substance. In general, intrinsic toxicities of substances may be the same, because they have the same functional groups and thus the same mode of action. Therefore, taking into account the similar predicted environmental fate and behaviour, the target substance is considered not to possess significantly higher toxicity potential to aquatic environment then the source substance. Thus, the results of the toxicity studies in fish available for the source substances are considered to be similar if these studies were conducted with the target substance. However, the target substance should be classified as aquatic toxic with long-lasting effects because its alkyl chains lengths are shorter (< C8) and thus aquatic toxicity potential cannot be ruled out. - Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 4.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Remarks on result:
- other: 3.5 - 5.7 mg/L
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 1.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities:
Sublethal effects of exposure were observed at the 5.6 mg/L loading rate WAF and above. These responses were increased pigmentation and moribund fish.
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values:
No insoluble materials were observed in the test solutions. Microscopic inspection of the WAFs showed no microdispersions or undissolved test material to be present. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- No reference tox. data reported
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- An estimate of the LL50 values at 3 and 6 hours was given by inspection of the mortality data. The LL50 values at 24 hour as well as the LL50 values and associated confidence limits at 48, 72 and 96 hours were calculated by the maximum likelihood probit method using the ToxCalc computer software package.
- Sublethal observations / clinical signs:
Table1. Cumulative Mortality Data
Nominal Test Concentration mg/L
Cumulative Mortality at Hour (Initial population =10 fish)
3 6 24 48 72 96
% Mortality at 96 hours
0, Control
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.2
0
0
0
2
2
2
20
5.6
0
0
2
7
7
7
70
10
0
0
4
10
10
10
100
Table 2. Statistical Analysis of Mortality Data
Exposure Period (hours)
LL50 (mg/L)
95% Confidence Limits (mg/L)
3
>10
--
6
>10
--
24
10
--
48
4.5
3.5 to 5.7
72
4.5
3.5 to 5.7
96
4.5
3.5 to 5.7
- Conclusions:
- The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater fish Oncorhynchus mykiss was investigated and resulted in a 96 hour LL50 of 4.5 mg/L and a NOEL of 1.8 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Introduction: A study was performed under GLP to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) according to OECD TG 203.
Methods: Following preliminary range finding studies, fish were exposed in groups of ten to water accommodated fractions of the test material over a range of nominal loading rates of 1.0, 1.8, 3.2, 5.6, and 10 mg/L for a period of 96 hours at a temperature of 14 °C under semi static test conditions. The number of mortalities and any sublethal effects of exposure in each test and control vessel were determined 3 and 6 hours after the start of exposure and then daily throughout the test until termination after 96 hours.
Results: The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater fish Oncorhynchus mykiss was investigated and resulted in a 96 hour LL50 of 4.5 mg/L (95% confidence limits of 3.5 to 5.7 mg/L) and a NOEL of 1.8 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH
Please refer also to the read-across statement attached in section 13
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The target and the source substances are structurally similar substances that share the common organometallic core structure consisting of a central zinc metal bonded to four alkyldithiophosphate esters (ligands) by coordinate covalent bonds -Zn[(S2P(OR)2]2. Structural variations between the target and the source substances are related only to the alkyl (R) groups of the alkyldithiophosphate ligands. The substances in this category give thus rise to an (identical) common compound Phosphorodithioic acid moiety that can be released by the breakage of ester bonds and dissociation from the Zinc complex to which the organism would be exposed if the target substance was tested in the toxicity studies. Exposure to the parent compounds (non-transformed constituents) and to the counter alkyl alcohols, possibly released by hydrolysis of P-O bonds – non-common compounds – would not influence the prediction of the (eco)toxicological properties because they are considered to have the same biological targets and to cause the same type of effects through a common underlying mechanism due to the same functional groups (zinc cation, phosphorodithioic cation and aliphatic alcohol anionic moieties). The impurities of the target and the source substances are not expected to impact the prediction because they are identical or, if slightly structural different, belong to the same class of compounds with the same functional groups and their percentages are very low.
2. CATEGORY APPROACH JUSTIFICATION (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The aquatic toxicity of the ZDDP category members is mainly influenced by the molecular weight (depends on the length of alkyl rests) and the water solubility. Numerous studies demonstrate decreasing toxicity with the increased chain length. Since the alkyl rests in the target substance are shorter (isobutyl, isopropyl and pentyl) than that of the source substance CAS 4259-15-8 (ethylhexyl) and the water solubility is higher (40.7 mg/L vs 9.1 mg/L for the target and the source substance, respectively) a higher bioavailability is expected for the target substance when compared to source substance CAS 4259-15-8. Regarding the source substances CAS 68457-79-4 and CAS 84605-29-8, the water solubilities are with 1625 and 2764 mg/L above the one of the target substance. Therefore, these source substances are expected to be more bioavailable than the target substance. Thus, data on CAS 68457-79-4 and CAS 84605-29-8 can serve as worst-case data for the target substance. In general, intrinsic toxicities of substances may be the same, because they have the same functional groups and thus the same mode of action. Therefore, taking into account the similar predicted environmental fate and behaviour, the target substance is considered not to possess significantly higher toxicity potential to aquatic environment then the source substance. Thus, the results of the toxicity studies in fish available for the source substances are considered to be similar if these studies were conducted with the target substance. However, the target substance should be classified as aquatic toxic with long-lasting effects because its alkyl chains lengths are shorter (< C8) and thus aquatic toxicity potential cannot be ruled out. - Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 46 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Remarks on result:
- other: 33 - 61 mg/L
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOEL
- Effect conc.:
- < 26 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities: The NOEL was reported to be less than 26 mg/L, the lowest concentration tested, and this endpoint is based on observations of physical and behavioral abnormalities including lethargy, loss of equilibrium, and darkened pigmentation.
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no insoluble materials were reported in the test solutions - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes. A reference test with sodium lauryl sulfate was conducted with the test fish and the resulting 96 hour LC50 was 1.3 mg/L with a 95% confidence interval of 0.72 to 2.0 mg/L.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The concentrations tested and the corresponding mortality data derived from the definitive toxicity test were used to estimate the medial LC50 values and 95% confidence intervals using standard statistical computations and software. The statistical methods available were probit analysis, nonlinear interpolation, and moving average analysis.
- Sublethal observations / clinical signs:
Table 1. Cumulative Mortality Data
WSF Test Concentration mg/L
Replicate
Cumulative Mortality (%) at Hour
24 48 72 96
1000
R1
R2
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
400
R1
R2
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
160
R1
R2
50
50
80
90
100
90
100
90
64
R1
R2
30
60
50
70
50
80
60
80
26
R1
R2
0
0
0
40
0
40
0
40
0, Control
R1
R2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Table 2. Statistical Analysis of Mortality Data
Exposure Period (hours)
LC50 (mg/L)
95% Confidence Limits (mg/L)
24
100
76 to 140
48
54
37 to 74
72
48
34 to 64
96
46
33 to 61
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The acute toxicity of the test material to the saltwater fish Cyprinodon variegatus was investigated and resulted in a 96 hour LC50 of 46 mg/L and a NOEL of less than 26 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Introduction: A study was performed under GLP to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) under static renewal test conditions according to OECD TG 203.
Methods: Following preliminary range finding studies, fish were exposed in groups of ten to water soluble fractions of the test material at nominal test concentrations of 0, 26, 64, 160, 400, and 1000 mg/L. The test was conducted under static renewal conditions for 96 hours at a temperature of 22 °C. The number of fish mortalities and any sublethal effects were recorded after 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours.
Results: The acute toxicity of the test material to the saltwater fish Cyprinodon variegatus was investigated and resulted in a 96 hour LC50 of 46 mg/L. A reference toxicity test was conducted with sodium lauryl sulfate resulting in a 96 hour LC50 of 1.3 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH
Please refer also to the read-across statement attached in section 13
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The target and the source substances are structurally similar substances that share the common organometallic core structure consisting of a central zinc metal bonded to four alkyldithiophosphate esters (ligands) by coordinate covalent bonds -Zn[(S2P(OR)2]2. Structural variations between the target and the source substances are related only to the alkyl (R) groups of the alkyldithiophosphate ligands. The substances in this category give thus rise to an (identical) common compound Phosphorodithioic acid moiety that can be released by the breakage of ester bonds and dissociation from the Zinc complex to which the organism would be exposed if the target substance was tested in the toxicity studies. Exposure to the parent compounds (non-transformed constituents) and to the counter alkyl alcohols, possibly released by hydrolysis of P-O bonds – non-common compounds – would not influence the prediction of the (eco)toxicological properties because they are considered to have the same biological targets and to cause the same type of effects through a common underlying mechanism due to the same functional groups (zinc cation, phosphorodithioic cation and aliphatic alcohol anionic moieties). The impurities of the target and the source substances are not expected to impact the prediction because they are identical or, if slightly structural different, belong to the same class of compounds with the same functional groups and their percentages are very low.
2. CATEGORY APPROACH JUSTIFICATION (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The aquatic toxicity of the ZDDP category members is mainly influenced by the molecular weight (depends on the length of alkyl rests) and the water solubility. Numerous studies demonstrate decreasing toxicity with the increased chain length. Since the alkyl rests in the target substance are shorter (isobutyl, isopropyl and pentyl) than that of the source substance CAS 4259-15-8 (ethylhexyl) and the water solubility is higher (40.7 mg/L vs 9.1 mg/L for the target and the source substance, respectively) a higher bioavailability is expected for the target substance when compared to source substance CAS 4259-15-8. Regarding the source substances CAS 68457-79-4 and CAS 84605-29-8, the water solubilities are with 1625 and 2764 mg/L above the one of the target substance. Therefore, these source substances are expected to be more bioavailable than the target substance. Thus, data on CAS 68457-79-4 and CAS 84605-29-8 can serve as worst-case data for the target substance. In general, intrinsic toxicities of substances may be the same, because they have the same functional groups and thus the same mode of action. Therefore, taking into account the similar predicted environmental fate and behaviour, the target substance is considered not to possess significantly higher toxicity potential to aquatic environment then the source substance. Thus, the results of the toxicity studies in fish available for the source substances are considered to be similar if these studies were conducted with the target substance. However, the target substance should be classified as aquatic toxic with long-lasting effects because its alkyl chains lengths are shorter (< C8) and thus aquatic toxicity potential cannot be ruled out. - Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 4.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Remarks on result:
- other: 4.4 - 4.6 mg/L
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 3.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Details on results:
- Behavioural abnormalities: Loss of equilibrium in the 5.6 mg/L test group at 48 hours.
- Mortality of control: 0/10 - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater fish Oncorhynchus mykiss was investigated and resulted in a 96 hour LL50 of 4.4 mg/L and a NOEL of 3.2 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Introduction: A study was performed under GLP to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) according to OECD TG 203.
Methods: Fish were exposed in groups of ten to water accommodated fractions of the test material over a range of nominal loading rates of 1.0, 1.8, 3.2, 5.6, and 10 mg/L for a period of 96 hours at a temperature of 14 °C under semi static test conditions. The number of mortalities and any sublethal effects of exposure in each test and control vessel were determined 3 and 6 hours after the start of exposure and then daily throughout the test until termination after 96 hours.
Results: The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater fish Oncorhynchus mykiss was investigated and resulted in a 96 hour LL50 of 4.4 mg/L (95% confidence limits of 4.4 to 4.6 mg/L) and a NOEL of 3.2 mg/L.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
Source substance Phosphorodithioic acid, mixed O,O-bis(1,3 -dimethylbutyl and iso-Pr) esters, zinc salts (CAS 84605 -29 -8):
The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater fish Oncorhynchus mykiss was investigated under GLP according to OECD guideline 203 in a Klimisch-2 study and resulted in a 96 hour LL50 of 4.5 mg/L (95% confidence limits of 3.5 to 5.7 mg/L) and a NOEL of 1.8 mg/L.
Source substance Zinc bis(O,O-diisobutyl dithiophosphate) (CAS 68457 -79 -4):
The acute toxicity of the test material to the saltwater fish Cyprinodon variegatus was investigated under GLP according to OECD guideline 203 in a Klimisch-2 study and resulted in a 96 hour LC50 of 46 mg/L. A reference toxicity test was conducted with sodium lauryl sulfate resulting in a 96 hour LC50 of 1.3 mg/L.
Source substance Zinc bis[O,O-bis(2-ethylhexyl)] bis(dithiophosphate) (CAS 4259 -15 -8):
The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater fish Oncorhynchus mykiss was investigated under GLP according to OECD guideline 203 in a Klimisch-2 study and resulted in a 96 hour LL50 of 4.4 mg/L (95% confidence limits of 4.4 to 4.6 mg/L) and a NOEL of 3.2 mg/L
The LL50 -values for the acute toxicity to freshwater fish are slightly differing (4.5 & 4.4 mg/L), but this is in range with the category approach, where nevertheless the members of one category may have different values.
For CSA the lower value is choosen as worst-case-approach .
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 4.4 mg/L
Marine water fish
Marine water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 46 mg/L
Additional information
The key value for the CSA for freshwater fish is stated as LL50, not as LC50!
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.