Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-378-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1992
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study was conducted similar to OECD guideline 202.
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the Quaternary ammonium salts (QAS) category or section 13 of IUCLID for details on the category justification.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Remarks on exposure duration:
- Because of the very rapid removal of the test substance from the water column, the geometric mean of the 0, 24 and 48-h concentrations was considered to be the overall exposure concentration in the acute toxicity tests.
- Hardness:
- Laboratory blended water (total hardness ~150 mg/L)
Southwest well water (total hardness ~350 mg/L)
River water (total hardness ~300-350 mg/L) - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Please refer to the table 1 of the attached background material for details on nominal and measured concentrations of all three test water types.
- Details on test conditions:
- Three water types were used in this test: laboratory blended water (total hardness ~150 mg/L), Southwest well water (total hardness ~350 mg/ L) and river water (total hardness ~300-350 mg/L).
The river water, exemplifying a natural surface water that received sewage effluent, was collected from the White River (Indiana) and transported for cold storage (~4°C).
Acute toxicity tests of 48-h duration were conducted in each water type employing seven concentrations of test substance plus control and an isopropanol (IPA) control. The tests were repeated to ensure reproducibility. The same procedures were utilized in the repeat tests with the exception of testing a more recently collected batch of White River water. There was no renewal of test waters throughout the 48-h test period. Mortality was recorded daily and water chemistry measurements were taken at the beginning and conclusion of the test period for control waters only. Each test substance concentration was verified by radiochemical counting of triplicate 10 mL samples collected from the fresh stock solution (0 h) and from a randomly selected beaker after 24 and 48 h. - Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 17.5 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: In Southwest well water (LC50 values in the initial and repeat tests were 19.8 and 15.3 μg/L, respectively).
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 12.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: In blended water (LC50 values in the initial and repeat tests were 16.3 and 8.8 μg/L, respectively).
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 98.9 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: In river water (initial test result only).
- Details on results:
- In the initial acute toxicity tests, little difference existed between LC50 values for blended and well waters. The river water LC50, however, was 5 to 11 times higher, possibly related to the presence of solids causing test substance adsorption and reduced bioavailability. An additional factor may have been that the river water contained endogenous nutritional sources perhaps enhancing daphnid resistance to the effects of the test substance.
Please refer to the table 2 of the attached background material for mortality data. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The 48-h LC50 values were determined by probit analysis based on the geometric mean of the 0, 24 and 48-h concentrations to reflect overall exposure concentrations.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, the 48 h LC50 measured concentration were 17.5 μg a.i./L in Southwest well water, 12.6 μg a.i./L in blended water and 98.9 μg a.i./L in river water
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the short-term toxicity of the read across substance, C16-18 and C18-unsatd. TMAC (48.4% active in water, radiochemical purity: 98%) to Daphnia magna according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 202, under static conditions. Twenty Daphnids were exposed to seven nominal concentrations of the read substance in three different water types (i.e., laboratory blended water, Southwest well water and river water). The nominal concentration in Southwest well and blended water were 11.5, 15.5, 21.0, 28.0, 37.0, 49.0 and 65.0 µg/L and 115, 155, 210, 280, 370, 490 and 650 µg/L in river water. The tests were repeated to ensure reproducibility. The same procedures were utilized in the repeat tests with the exception of testing a more recently collected batch of river water. Mortality was recorded daily and water chemistry measurements were made at the beginning and end of the test period for control waters only. Each read across substance concentration was verified by radiochemical counting of triplicate 10 mL samples collected from the fresh stock solution (0 hour) and from a randomly selected beaker after 24 and 48 h. Because of the very rapid removal of the test substance from the water column, the geometric mean of the 0, 24 and 48-hour concentrations was considered to be the overall exposure concentration in the acute toxicity tests. The initial and repeat 48-h LC50s values of the read across substance based on the measured concentrations were determined to be 19.8 and 15.3 μg/L (geometric mean: 17.5 μg/L) in Southwest well water, 16.3 and 8.8 μg/L (geometric mean: 12.6 μg/L) in blended water and 98.9 μg a.i./L (initial) in rive water respectively. In the initial acute toxicity tests, little difference existed between LC50 values for blended and well waters. The river water LC50, however, was 5 to 11 times higher, possibly related to the presence of solids causing test substance adsorption and reduced bioavailability. An additional factor may have been that the river water contained endogenous nutritional sources perhaps enhancing daphnid resistance to the effects of the read across substance. Under the test conditions, the 48 h LC50 measured concentration were 17.5 μg a.i./L in Southwest well water, 12.6 μg a.i./L in blended water and 98.9 μg a.i./L in river water (TRS-HPV, 2001). Based on the results of the read across study, similar effect levels are considered for the test substance.
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 17 July, 1990 to 19 July, 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- No analytical measurement was performed.
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the Quaternary ammonium salts (QAS) category or section 13 of IUCLID for details on the category justification.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.2 (Acute Toxicity for Daphnia)
- Version / remarks:
- as published in 84/449/EEC
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- The test sample was prepared by direct dissolution in water. 1.0 g of the test substance was dissolved in water and the volume adjusted to 1 L. This stock solution was then diluted to give a 0.10 mg/L stock solution from which serial dilutions were made to give the test series.
The test substance was known to absorb to glassware and so saturation of the absorption sites was achieved by soaking the test vessels overnight prior to the start of the test with the test solutions. At 0 h the test vessels were emptied, rinsed with the solution to be tested and then refined with the fresh test solution. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Source: Laboratory culture originating from a strain supplied by I.R.C.H.A., France.
- Culture: At 21˚C in polypropylene vessels containing 2 L of dechlorinated and aged tap water. Cultures were fed daily with a mixture of fry fish food (liquifry) and a suspension of mixed algae (predominantly Chlorella spp.). Culture conditions ensure that reproduction is by parthenogenesis.
- Selection: Gravid adults were isolated 24 h prior to initiation of the test. Young daphnids produced overnight were used for testing. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- No
- Hardness:
- 50 mg/L of CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 21 ± 1˚C
- pH:
- 7.1-7.2
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.3-8.6 mg O2/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0.0010, 0.0018, 0.0032, 0.0056, 0.010, 0.018, 0.032, 0.056 and 0.10 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM:
- Test water: Dechlorinated (with sodium thiosulphate) and aged laboratory tap water. Total hardness approximately 50 mg/L as CaC03.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10 per replicate
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): Two
EXPOSURE CONDITIONS:
- Test vessels: Glass beakers each containing 200 mL test solution
- Experimental design: 9 test concentrations plus one control, each in duplicate. 20 animals per concentration
- Method of initiation: Daphnia were placed in the test solutions after addition of the test substance
- Loading: 20 mL test solution per organism
- Photo-period: 16h light: 8h dark
- Aeration: None
- Medium renewal: None
CRITERIA OF EFFECT: Daphnia were considered to be immobilised if they were unable to swim for approximately 15 sec after gentle agitation. - Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.091 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: (95% CL = 0.015-0.025 mg a.i./L)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.009 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: (95% CL = 0.0072-0.012 mg a.i./L)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.006 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.003 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the 48 h EC50 and NOEC were 0.0091 and 0.0026 mg a.i./L, respectively.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the short-term toxicity of the read across substance, C16-18 TMAC (46.5% active in isopropanol and water) to Daphnia magna under static conditions according to OECD Guideline 202, in compliance with GLP. Ten daphnids per group were exposed to the read across substance at nominal concentrations of 0.0010, 0.0018, 0.0032, 0.0056, 0.010, 0.018, 0.032, 0.056 and 0.10 mg/L for 48 h followed by determination of immobilisation. No analytical determination of the read across substance was performed. The 24 and 48 h EC50 value were calculated as 0.035 (95% confidence limits (CL): 0.027-0.044) and 0.019 mg/L (95% CL: 0.015-0.025) respectively, which was equivalent to 0.016 (95% CL: 0013-0.021) and 0.0091 (95% CL: 0.0072-0.012) mg a.i./L respectively. The 24 and 48 h NOEC values were determined to be 0.010 (i.e., 0.0047) and 0.0056 mg/L (i.e., 0.0026 mg a.i./L) respectively. Under the study conditions, the 48-h EC50 and NOEC were 0.0091 and 0.0026 mg a.i./L, respectively (Handley and Wetton, 1990). Based on the results of the read across study, similar effect levels are considered for the test substance.
Referenceopen allclose all
For result tables and figures, kindly refer to the attached background material section of the IUCLID.
Description of key information
Based on the results of the read across studies,the lower 48-h EC50 value of 0.0091 mg/L (nominal) for effects on mobility in Daphnia magna, has been considered further for hazard/risk assessment of the test substance
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Remarks:
- 48 h
- Effect concentration:
- 9.1 µg/L
Additional information
Study 1: A study was conducted to determine the short-term toxicity of the read across substance, C16-18 TMAC (46.5% active in isopropanol and water) to Daphnia magna under static conditions according to OECD Guideline 202, in compliance with GLP. Ten daphnids per group were exposed to the read across substance at nominal concentrations of 0.0010, 0.0018, 0.0032, 0.0056, 0.010, 0.018, 0.032, 0.056 and 0.10 mg/L for 48 h followed by determination of immobilisation. No analytical determination of the read across substance was performed. The 24 and 48 h EC50 value were calculated as 0.035 (95% confidence limits (CL): 0.027-0.044) and 0.019 mg/L (95% CL: 0.015-0.025) respectively, which was equivalent to 0.016 (95% CL: 0013-0.021) and 0.0091 (95% CL: 0.0072-0.012) mg a.i./L respectively. The 24 and 48 h NOEC values were determined to be 0.010 (i.e., 0.0047) and 0.0056 mg/L (i.e., 0.0026 mg a.i./L) respectively. Under the study conditions, the 48-h EC50 and NOEC were 0.0091 and 0.0026 mg a.i./L, respectively (Handley and Wetton, 1990).
Study 2: A study was conducted to determine the short-term toxicity of the read across substance, C16-18 and C18-unsatd. TMAC (48.4% active in water, radiochemical purity: 98%) to Daphnia magna according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 202, under static conditions. Twenty Daphnids were exposed to seven nominal concentrations of the read across substance in three different water types (i.e., laboratory blended water, Southwest well water and river water). The nominal concentration in Southwest well and blended water were 11.5, 15.5, 21.0, 28.0, 37.0, 49.0 and 65.0 µg/L and 115, 155, 210, 280, 370, 490 and 650 µg/L in river water. The tests were repeated to ensure reproducibility. The same procedures were utilized in the repeat tests with the exception of testing a more recently collected batch of river water. Mortality was recorded daily and water chemistry measurements were made at the beginning and end of the test period for control waters only. Each read across substance concentration was verified by radiochemical counting of triplicate 10 mL samples collected from the fresh stock solution (0 hour) and from a randomly selected beaker after 24 and 48 h. Because of the very rapid removal of the read across substance from the water column, the geometric mean of the 0, 24 and 48-hour concentrations was considered to be the overall exposure concentration in the acute toxicity tests. The initial and repeat 48-h LC50s values of the read across substance based on the measured concentrations were determined to be 19.8 and 15.3 μg/L (geometric mean: 17.5 μg/L) in Southwest well water, 16.3 and 8.8 μg/L (geometric mean: 12.6 μg/L) in blended water and 98.9 μg a.i./L (initial) in rive water respectively. In the initial acute toxicity tests, little difference existed between LC50 values for blended and well waters. The river water LC50, however, was 5 to 11 times higher, possibly related to the presence of solids causing read across substance adsorption and reduced bioavailability. An additional factor may have been that the river water contained endogenous nutritional sources perhaps enhancing daphnid resistance to the effects of the read across substance. Under the test conditions, the 48 h LC50 measured concentration were 17.5 μg a.i./L in Southwest well water, 12.6 μg a.i./L in blended water and 98.9 μg a.i./L in river water (TRS-HPV, 2001).
Based on the results of the read across studies, the lower 48-h EC50 value of 0.0091 mg/L (nominal) for effects on mobility in Daphnia magna, has been considered further for hazard/risk assessment of the test substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.