Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation, other
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
other: read across from supporting substance
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study has been presented to ECHA in the framework of a NONS notification. The document is now public because presented more than 12 years ago. The summary received is from migrated NONS dossier

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
LLNA in vivo study not available at the time of testing

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
refer to confidential details on test material
IUPAC Name:
refer to confidential details on test material

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

maximum concnetration not casugin effects in the preliminary test: 10%.

No animals showed irritation during induction, even though the erythema observation was not possible due to orange discolouration of the skin.

No evidence of sensitisation on the surviving animals. Two animals were found dead at day 15th without any relation to the tested substance exposure.

Duirng the preliminary test for dose range finding, light erythema was observed at 15, 25 and 50%. The dose of 10% was therefore chosen for the main experiment

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not classified under Regulation 1272/2008
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The substance was tested for skin sensitisation following EU Method B6 (GPMT). Under the experimental conditions the substance does not show any skin sensitizing properties.
Executive summary:

The substance was tested for skin sensitisation following EU Method B6 (GPMT). Under the experimental conditions the substance does not show any skin sensitizing properties.