Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The substance is not irritating for intact and abraded rabbit skin.
The substance is not irritating for rabbit eye.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation / corrosion, other
- Remarks:
- An in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo study are available.
- Type of information:
- other: read across from supporting substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.11 (February 1965).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Study conducted before 1981
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Porton
- Age at study initiation: 9-15 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.44 Kg (♂), 2.10 kg (♀)
- Housing: Bred oh the premises and maintained under a semi-barrier system.
- Diet: A commercial irradiated diet (Styles-Oxoid) was fed ad lib.
- Water: Sterile filtered water was available at all times.
- Acclimation period: 1 week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 1°C
- Humidity (%): 50-70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Animals were exposed to artificial light for 10 hours daily from 08:00 - 18.00 hours. - Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and abraded
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 10 g of the test compound was mixed with 10 ml of water to make a solution of 15 ml, 0.75 ml of which was applied to each test site - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 24 and 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- Six rabbits (5 ♂ and 1 ♀)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- % coverage: 10 % of the total body surface.
- Type of wrap if used: The site were covered with aluminium foil secured with "Sleek" adhesive tape. The test sites were then enclosed by a 6" wide "Coban" self adhesive bandage the edges of which were fixed to the skin by strips of "Sleek" in order to retain the test substance in close contact with the skin.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize et al. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- Time point:
- other: mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no skin reaction observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: shaved skin
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 16
- Time point:
- other: mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: shaved skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 11, 12
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24 ,48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: shaved skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 14, 16
- Time point:
- other: mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no skin reaction observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: shaved skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 13
- Time point:
- other: mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: shaved skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 15
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: shaved skin
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The value assessed at 24 hours was used also for 48 hours in a protective manner because no observation was made at 48 hours after the beginning of test.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified according to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008)
- Conclusions:
- The substance is not irritating for skin rabbit.
- Executive summary:
The substance has been tested for skin irritation according to the method "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S. federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.11 (February 1965). During the test 5 male and 1 female rabbits are tested with 10 g of test item on shaved and abraded skin after 24 hours of patch treatment. Under the conditions of the present experiment the substance was considered to be not irritant for rabbit skin.
Reference
Slight erythema and very slight to moderate oedeme was seen in 2/6 and 6/6 rabbits respectively, 24 hours after application of the compound. Very slight oedema was still present on 1/6 abraded sites at 72 hours.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation, other
- Remarks:
- An in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo study are available.
- Type of information:
- other: read across from supporting substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 11, 1975
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S.A. federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Study conducted before 1981
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Porton strain
- Age at study initiation: 9-15 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.44 kgs. (♂) 30d 2.10 kgs. (♀)
- Housing: bred on the premises and maintained under a semi-barrier system
- Diet: A commercial irradiated diet (Styles-Oxoid) was fed ad libitum
- Water: Sterile filtered water was available at all times
- Acclimation period: one week prior to the start of the trial
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 1°C
- Humidity (%): 50-70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Animals were exposed to artificial light for 10 hours daily from 08.00-18.00 hours - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 100 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single injection
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The rabbits were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, 6, 10 and 14days after application of the test compound and for any further period that was considered necessary.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 5 male and 1 female
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: yes, after 30 seconds the compound was, as far as possible, flushed out of the eye of three of the rabbits with warm water for 1 minute - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: 14, 15, 16
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no eye effect observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: Rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: 14, 15
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- redness
- Basis:
- animal: 16
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 1.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: 14, 15
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no eye effect observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: Rinsed
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: 16
- Time point:
- other: Mean score after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- ca. 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Rinsed
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified according to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008)
- Conclusions:
- The substance is not irritating for rabbit eyes.
- Executive summary:
The substance has been tested for eye irritation according to The method "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S. federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965). During the test 5 male and 1 female rabbits are treated with 100 mg of the test compound. After 14 days only one animal (n. 13) showed a redness score (1), nevertheless in order to evaluate the irritation potential of the test item this animal was not considerd because his eyes were not rinsed after application.
The substance is considered to be not irritant for rabbit eyes.
Reference
A slight to mild conjunctival reaction was seen in all treated eyes one hour after application of the compound. Generally there was very little change by 24 hours and thereafter the reactions subsided slowly with 3/3 washed and 2/3 unwashed eyes returning to normal as follows:- 72 hours (2/3 washed eyes), 6 days (1/3 washed eyes) and 10 days (2/3 unwashed eyes). The remaining unwashed eye still showed a very slight reaction at the termination of the study on day 14. Staining of the conjunctivae by the compound was seen in all eyes for up to 48 hours in the washed eyes, 10 days for 2/3 unwashed eyes and the duration for the remaining eye.
A slight corneal reaction consisting of slight opacity and damage to the surface epithelium was seen in 2/3 unwashed eyes at 24 and 48 hours. Staining of the cornea by the compound was also seen in the unwashed eyes for up to 10 days for 2/3 and the duration for the remaining one.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Test on skin and eye irritation are available on similar substance 1. The complete hypothesis and justification for the read across approach has been attached in section 13.
Skin irritation assessment:
The assessment was based on single study (Huntsman, 1975) according to the method of the U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.11 (February 1965). During the study only one rabbit shows a signs of erythema on intact skin. Oedema formation was recorded with 4 rabbits from very slight to slight, but all signs of irritation are fully recovered within 72 hours.
No animal showed a mean value for erythema or edema reaction ≥ 2.3
Eye irritation assessment:
The assessment was based on single study (Huntsman, 1975) irritation according to the method of the U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965). During the study 5 male and 1 female rabbits were exposed to test article instilled into the conjunctival sac. After 30 seconds the compound was, as far as possible, flushed out of the eyes of three of the rabbits for one minute with warm water. At the end of the observation period (14 days) all the irritation effect were fully reversible except for one rabbit that showed a residual redness score (1).
Considering that the eye of the animal was not rinsed and the observation period has a duration of 14 days instead of 21 as reported in the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008), the score was not considered for the evaluation of the irritation potential according the CLP Regulation.
No animal showed a mean value ≥ 1 for corneal opacity, ≥ 2 for conjunctival redness or ≥ 2 for conjunctival opacity
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008), skin Irritation means the production of reversible damage to the skin following the application of a test substance for up to 4 hours.
The substance shows a very low interaction between with the rabbit skin. The values of erythema and oedema are below the trigger values for classification, therefore no classification is warranted according to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008).
According to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008) eye irritation means the production of changes in the eye following the application of test substance to the anterior surface of the eye, which are fully reversible within 21 days of application.
The substance does not show eye effects with values above the trigger value for the classification. therfore the substance is not classified according to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.