Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-751-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- July 07, 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Phosphoric acid, hexadecyl esters, potassium salts with cetyl alcohol and isostearyl isostearate
- EC Number:
- 947-751-9
- Molecular formula:
- C16H34O4P1K1 (representative: mono- C16 PSE, K+) C16H34O1 (representative alcohol: C16 alcohol) C36H72O2 (isostearyl isostearate)
- IUPAC Name:
- Phosphoric acid, hexadecyl esters, potassium salts with cetyl alcohol and isostearyl isostearate
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Eyes from adult cattle were obtained from local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals. The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee and placed in Hanks’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), supplemented with Penicillin/Streptomycin, and transported to the laboratory on ice packs. The eyes were refrigerated on arrival and used within 24 of receipt.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Neat test substance. For the purpose of this study the test substance was pulverised and chopped to a suitable consistency before use.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- First incubation, with the test substance for 240 min. Subsequently a post treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed.
Second incubation: 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL) at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes. - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas were allocated to the negative, positive control and the test substance.
- Details on study design:
- Preparation of Corneas
All eyes were macroscopically examined before and after dissection. Only corneas free of damage were used. The cornea from each selected eye was removed leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera to facilitate handling. The iris and lens were peeled away from the cornea. The isolated cornea were immersed (epithelial side uppermost) in a dish containing HBSS until they were mounted in Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) holders. The anterior and posterior chambers of each BCOP holder were filled with complete minimum essential medium (MEM) and plugged. The holders were incubated at 32 ± 1 °C for at least 60 minutes. At the end of incubation period each cornea was examined fr defects. Only corneas free of damage were used.
Selection of Corneas and Opacity Reading
The medium from both chambers of each holder was replaced with fresh complete MEM. A pre-treatment opacity reading was taken for each cornea using a calibrated opacitometer. The average opacity for all corneas was calculated. Three corneas were also numerically allocated to the negative control substance and three corneas to the positive control test substance.
Treatment of Corneas
The MEM was removed from the anterior chamber of the BCOP holder and the neat test substance or control substances were applied to the cornea. The holders were gently tilted back and forth to ensure a uniform application of the substance over the entire cornea. Each holder was incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 °C for 240 minutes. At the end of exposure period the test substance and control substances were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete MEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete MEM. The anterior and posterior chambers were refilled with fresh complete MEM. A post-treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea were visually observed.
Application of Sodium Fluorescein
Following the opacity measurement the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium from the anterior chamber was removed and replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL). The dosing holes were plugged and the holders incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes.
Permeability Determinations
After incubation the medium in the posterior chamber of each holder was decanted and retained. 360 μL of medium representing each cornea was applied to a designated well on a 96-well plate and the optical density at 492 nm (OD492) was measured. If values greater than 1.500 OD492 were obtined a 1 in 5 dilution of the medium in complete MEM was performed and the measurement repeated. The modified value was multiplied by 5 to reflect dilution.
Histopathology
The corneas were retained after testing for possible conduct of histopathology. Each cornea was placed into a pre-labeled tissue cassette fitted with a histology sponge to protect the endothelial surface. The cassette was immersed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- 240 min
- Value:
- 1
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 3.3
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 99.6
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Criteria:
- A test substance that induces an In Vitro Irritancy Score >55.1 is defined as an ocular corrosive or severe irritant.
Result: the test substance was considered not to be an occular corrosive or severe irritant.
- 20 % w/v Imidazole was used for positive control purposes. The test is acceptable if the positive control produced an In Vitro Irritancy Score which fell within two standard deviations of the historical mean for this testing facility. In this case should be within: 55.8 - 126.1.
Result: passed
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not classified based on EU CLP criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be non-corrosive or non-irritating to the eye.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro study was conducted to determine the corneal damage potential by the test substance, 'mono- and di- C16 PSE, K+ and C16-OH and isostearyl isostearate' (100%), using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) method according to OECD Guideline 437, in compliance with GLP. One valid experiment was performed with three replicates for negative control, positive control and the test substance. The undiluted test substance was applied in a way that as much as possible of the corneas surface was covered. Subsequently corneas were incubated for 240 minutes at 32 ± 1°C in BCOP corneal holder. At the end of the exposure period the test substance and control substances were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete MEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete MEM. The anterior and posterior chambers were refilled with fresh complete MEM. A post treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed. Following the opacity measurement the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium was replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL) and corneas were incubated again at 32 ± 1°C for 90 minutes. After incubation 360 μL of medium representing each cornea was applied to a designated well on a 96-well plate and the optical density at 492 nm (OD492) was measured. The two endpoints opacity and permeability were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an in vitro irritancy score (IVIS). The obtained in vitro irritancy scores for the test substance, negative control and positive control were 1 (which is well below the threshold for no classification for eye), 3.3, and 99.6, respectively. The study was considered to have met all the validity criteria. Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be non-corrosive or non-irritating to the eye (Harlan, 2012).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.