Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Ames test: non mutagenic (OECD 471, GLP, K, rel. 1).

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
09 to 27 Februray 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 471 without any deviation
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
dated 21 July 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
dated 30 May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Version / remarks:
August 1998
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ENV/EPOC(97)4 OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Proposal for Replacement of Guidelines 471 and 472 Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EEC Directive 2000/32, L1362000, Annex 4D, dated May 19, 2000
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: The Japanese Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (METI), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines of 31 March 2011
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
14 September 2015
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Storage Conditions:Room temperature
Target gene:
he histidine dependent strains are derived from Salmonella typhimurium strain LT2 through mutations in the histidine locus. Additionally due to the "deep rough" (rfa-minus) mutation they possess a faulty lipopolysaccharide envelope which enables substances to penetrate the cell wall more easily. A further mutation causes a reduction in the activity of an excision repair system. The latter alteration includes mutational processes in the nitrate reductase and biotin genes produced in a UV-sensitive area of the gene named "uvrB-minus". In the strains TA 98 and TA 100 the R-factor plasmid pKM 101 carries the ampicillin resistance marker.
Strain Escherichia coli WP2 and its derivatives carry the same defect in one of the genes for tryptophan biosynthesis. Tryptophan-independent (Trp+) mutants (revertants) can arise either by a base change at the site of the original alteration or by a base change elsewhere in the chromosome so that the original defect is suppressed. This second possibility can occur in several different ways so that the system seems capable of detecting all types of mutagen which substitute one base for another. Additionally, the uvrA derivative is deficient in the DNA repair process (excision repair damage). Such a repair-deficient strain may be more readily mutated by agents.
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Cytokinesis block (if used):
Not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
According to the standard limit concentrations recommended in the regulatory guidelines 5000 µg/plate was applied as the highest concentration in the pre-experiment.
Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II:
Strains TA 100: 0.3; 1; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; and 1000 µg/plate
The remaining strains: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
On the day of the experiment, the test item was dissolved in DMSO (purity > 99 %). The solvent has been chosen according to its solubility properties and its relative nontoxicity to the bacteria (Maron et al.; 1981)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine and 2-aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
SOURCE OF TEST SYSTEM: The bacterial strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA were obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH (35394 Gießen, Germany).

METHOD OF APPLICATION:
EXPERIMENT: Experiment I (Plate Incorporation)
The following materials were mixed in a test tube and poured onto the selective agar plates:
100 µL Test solution at each dose level (solvent or reference mutagen solution (positive control)),
500 µL S9 mix (for test with metabolic activation) or S9 mix substitution buffer (for test without metabolic activation),
100 µL Bacteria suspension (cf. test system, pre-culture of the strains),
2000 µL Overlay agar
Experiment II (Pre-Incubation)
In the pre-incubation assay 100 µL test solution (solvent or reference mutagen solution (positive control)), 500 µL S9 mix / S9 mix substitution buffer and 100 µL bacterial suspension were mixed in a test tube and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. After pre-incubation 2.0 mL overlay agar (45°C) was added to each tube.
The mixture was poured on minimal agar plates. After solidification the plates were incubated upside down for at least 48 hours at 37°C in the dark.
In parallel to each test a sterile control of the test item was performed and documented in the raw data. Therefore, 100 µL of the stock solution, 500 µl S9 mix / S9 mix substitution buffer were mixed with 2.0 mL overlay agar and poured on minimal agar plates.

CONTROLS:
- Vehicle/solvent control: DMSO
- Negative (untreated) controls were performed to assess the spontaneous revertant colony rate.
- Positive control items used demonstrated a direct and indirect acting mutagenic effect depending on the presence or absence of metabolic activation

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate

OTHER: PRE-EXPERIMENT: To evaluate the toxicity of the test item a pre-experiment was performed with all strains used. Eight concentrations were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with each 3 plates
Rationale for test conditions:
In the pre-experiment the concentration range of the test item was 3 – 5000 µg/plate. The pre-experiment is reported as experiment I. Since toxic effects were observed in experiment I, a minimum of six concentrations was tested in experiment II. Based on the observed toxic effects 1000 µg/plate were chosen as maximum concentration for strain TA 100. For the remaining strains the maximum concentration was 5000 µg/plate. The concentration range included two logarithmic decades.
The following concentrations were tested in experiment II:
Strain TA 100: 0.3; 1; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; and 1000 µg/plate
The remaining strains: 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Evaluation criteria:
The Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
•regular background growth in the negative and solvent control;
•the spontaneous reversion rates in the negative and solvent control are in the range of our historical data;
• the positive control substances should produce an increase above the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding solvent control;
•a minimum of five analysable dose levels should be present with at least three dose levels showing no signs of toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants below the indication factor of 0.5;
•if precipitation occurs a minimum of four concentrations showing no precipitation should be analysed.
Statistics:
None
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
5000 µg/plate in Exp 1 without S9, 5000 µg/plate in Exp 1 with S9, 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in Exp 2 without S9, 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in Exp 2 with S9,
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
333 to 5000 µg/plate in Exp 1 without S9, 1000 to 5000 µg/plate in Exp 1 with S9, 100 to 1000 µg/plate in Exp 2 without S9, 333 to 1000 µg/plate in Exp 2 with S9,
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Precipitation: Precipitation of the test item in the overlay agar on the incubated agar plates was observed from 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in both experiments. Based on a lower top dose of 1000 µg/plate no precipitation of the test substance was observed on the incubated agar plates in strain TA 100 in experiment II. The undissolved particles had no influence on the data recording.

The plates incubated with the test item showed reduced background growth at the following concentrations (µg/plate):
Strain Experiment I Experiment II
without S9 mix with S9 mix without S9 mix ith S9 mix
TA 1535 / / / /
TA 1537 1000 – 5000 1000 – 5000 / /
TA 98 1000 – 5000 1000 – 5000 1000 – 5000 1000 – 5000
TA 100 333 – 5000 1 000 – 5000 3 33 – 1000 333 – 1000
WP2 uvrA / / / /

MUTAGENICITY
- The vehicle (DMSO) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with Blue chamomilla - European origin at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls. They showed a distinct in-crease in induced revertant colonies.
In experiment II the number of colonies did not quite reach the lower limit of our historical control data in the negative control strain Wp2 uvrA without S9 mix. Since this deviation is rather small, this effect is judged to be based upon statistical fluctuations and has no detrimental impact on the outcome of the study

- Refer Tables 7.6.1/1 and 7.6.1/2 for more details and attached background for individual results.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation
- Positive historical control data: Refer Table 7.6.1/3
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: Refer Table 7.6.1/3

Table 7.6.1 /1 Summary of Experiment I

Study Name: 1875200

Study Code: Envigo 1875200

Experiment: 1875200 VV Plate

Date Plated: 09.02.2018

Assay Conditions:

Date Counted: 13.02.2018

 

Metabolic

Activation

Test

Group

Dose Level

(per plate)

Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Without Activation

DMSO

 

12 ± 3

12 ± 2

27 ± 8

173 ± 20

28 ± 2

Untreated

 

7 ± 3

12 ± 3

30 ± 8

179 ± 10

37 ± 11

Blue

3 µg

11 ± 3

13 ± 6

24 ± 3

183 ± 6

28 ± 3

chamomilla-

10 µg

12 ± 2

9 ± 3

23 ± 4

180 ± 21

29 ± 9

European

33 µg

9 ± 3

9 ± 1

23 ± 4

161 ± 9

30 ± 11

origin

100 µg

9 ± 1

10 ± 2

30 ± 6

144 ± 1

27 ± 6

 

333 µg

12 ± 5

14 ± 5

24 ± 3

47 ± 1R

32 ± 8

 

1000 µg

12 ± 2

14 ± 4R

24 ± 2R

17 ± 5M R

32 ± 3

 

2500 µg

12 ± 4P M

14 ± 2P R

15 ± 3P R

3 ± 1P M R

26 ± 8P

 

5000 µg

8 ± 3P M

9 ± 1P M R

7 ± 1P M R

1 ± 1P M R

30 ± 8P M

NaN3

10 µg

868 ± 74

 

 

2222 ± 194

 

4-NOPD

10 µg

 

 

384 ± 11

 

 

4-NOPD

50 µg

 

59 ± 2

 

 

 

MMS

2.0 µL

 

 

 

 

808 ± 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With Activation

DMSO

 

11 ± 2

12 ± 1

42 ± 8

185 ± 9

37 ± 10

Untreated

 

12 ± 2

12 ± 4

49 ± 6

189 ± 36

44 ± 10

Blue

3 µg

12 ± 3

16 ± 1

44 ± 6

149 ± 3

36 ± 4

chamomilla-

10 µg

14 ± 3

12 ± 4

36 ± 5

146 ± 11

28 ± 8

European

33 µg

14 ± 3

13 ± 3

42 ± 9

165 ± 12

35 ± 11

origin

100 µg

14 ± 3

17 ± 3

37 ± 2

132 ± 16

44 ± 10

 

333 µg

15 ± 5

13 ± 3

30 ± 3

87 ± 6

37 ± 4

 

1000 µg

12 ± 3

16 ± 1R

25 ± 8R

25 ± 6R

30 ± 9

 

2500 µg

11 ± 4P M

11 ± 3P M R

30 ± 9P R

6 ± 2P M R

29 ± 10P M

 

5000 µg

6 ± 1P M

12 ± 3P M R

18 ± 3P M R

2 ± 2P M R

30 ± 8P M

2-AA

2.5 µg

506 ± 8

143 ± 18

3923 ± 200

5457 ± 247

 

2-AA

10.0 µg

 

 

 

 

475 ± 38

Table 7.6.1/2 Summary of Experiment II

Study Name: 1875200

Study Code: Envigo 1875200

Experiment: 1875200 HV2 Pre

Date Plated: 20.02.2018

Assay Conditions:

Date Counted: 27.02.2018

 

Metabolic

Activation

Test

Group

Dose Level

(per plate)

Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Without Activation

DMSO

 

9 ± 3

8 ± 2

26 ± 10

136 ± 17

29 ± 2

Untreated

 

10 ± 3

8 ± 3

29 ± 7

196 ± 40

28 ± 4

Blue

0.3 µg

 

 

 

139 ± 8

 

chamomilla-

1 µg

 

 

 

125 ± 15

 

European

3 µg

 

 

 

122 ± 7

 

origin

10 µg

 

 

 

109 ± 6

 

 

33 µg

9 ± 4

7 ± 2

27 ± 8

84 ± 18

23 ± 0

 

100 µg

8 ± 4

10 ± 2

17 ± 4

32 ± 3

26 ± 4

 

333 µg

8 ± 3

8 ± 1

15 ± 5

29 ± 2R

27 ± 6

 

1000 µg

9 ± 3

10 ± 1

15 ± 2R

16 ± 2M R

26 ± 8

 

2500 µg

7 ± 2P

7 ± 3P

8 ± 0P M R

 

28 ± 2P

 

5000 µg

9 ± 1P M

5 ± 1P M

2 ± 1P M R

 

26 ± 7P M

NaN3

10 µg

1145 ± 70

 

 

2142 ± 148

 

4-NOPD

10 µg

 

 

370 ± 30

 

 

4-NOPD

50 µg

 

52 ± 15

 

 

 

MMS

2.0 µL

 

 

 

 

680 ± 56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With Activation

DMSO

 

13 ± 4

12 ± 2

35 ± 9

107 ± 8

39 ± 12

Untreated

 

13 ± 4

13 ± 2

41 ± 4

177 ± 7

32 ± 1

Blue

0.3 µg

 

 

 

108 ± 3

 

chamomilla-

1 µg

 

 

 

110 ± 14

 

European

3 µg

 

 

 

124 ± 13

 

origin

10 µg

 

 

 

124 ± 17

 

 

33 µg

13 ± 6

13 ± 4

34 ± 7

113 ± 6

43 ± 10

 

100 µg

13 ± 1

9 ± 3

31 ± 6

118 ± 6

41 ± 8

 

333 µg

12 ± 4

12 ± 1

24 ± 1

39 ± 5R

37 ± 11

 

1000 µg

12 ± 2

13 ± 3

26 ± 9R

23 ± 12R

32 ± 10

 

2500 µg

12 ± 4P

12 ± 4P M

15 ± 4P M R

 

25 ± 8P M

 

5000 µg

8 ± 2P

14 ± 3P M

3 ± 2P M R

 

27 ± 5P M

2-AA

2.5 µg

365 ± 7

197 ± 14

4121 ± 575

4029 ± 522

 

2-AA

10.0 µg

 

 

 

 

245 ± 33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key to Positive Controls

Key to Plate Postfix Codes

 

 

NaN3

2-AA

4-NOPD

MMS

sodium azide

2-aminoanthracene

4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine

methyl methane sulfonate

R

M

P

Reduced background growth

Manual count

Precipitate

Table 7.6.1/3/ Historical data

Strain

 

without S9 mix

with S9 mix

 

 

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Min

Max

 

Solvent control

12

2.5

6

25

12

2.5

7

26

TA 1535

Untreated control

12

3.1

6

28

12

2.9

7

26

 

Positive control

1130

143.1

334

1816

388

58.2

176

668

 

Solvent control

10

2.2

6

19

13

3.5

7

30

TA1537

Untreated control

11

2.7

5

21

14

4.0

7

31

 

Positive control

82

12.7

43

157

191

60.8

83

434

 

Solvent control

25

4.4

13

43

34

6.2

15

58

TA 98

Untreated control

27

4.9

12

43

37

6.5

11

57

 

Positive control

378

73.7

211

627

3949

771.8

360

6586

 

Solvent control

156

26.0

78

209

148

32.3

73

208

TA 100

Untreated control

176

23.6

79

217

172

25.4

85

218

 

Positive control

1966

293.2

498

2767

3798

830.4

536

6076

 

Solvent control

41

5.6

27

63

50

6.8

28

72

WP2uvrA

Untreated control

42

5.8

30

63

52

6.8

36

88

 

Positive control

798

362.7

319

4732

378

112.6

167

1265

Mean = mean value of revertants/plate
SD = standard deviation

Min = minimal value/Max = maximal value

Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Executive summary:

This study was performed to investigate the potential of Blue chamomilla - European origin to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using theSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and the Escherichia colistrain WP2 uvrA.

The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations:

Pre-Experiment/Experiment I:       3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate

Experiment II:

Strains TA 100:                              0.3; 1; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; and 1000 µg/plate

The remaining strains:                   33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate

The test item precipitated in the overlay agar in the test tubes from 1000 to 5000 µg/plate in experiment I and from 333 µg/plate up to the highest investigated dose in experiment II. Precipitation of the test item in the overlay agar on the incubated agar plates was observed from 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in both experiments. Based on a lower top dose of 1000 µg/plate no precipitation of the test substance was observed on the incubated agar plates in strain TA 100 in experiment II. The undissolved particles had no influence on the data recording.

The plates incubated with the test item showed reduced background in strains TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 100.

Toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in strains TA 98 and TA 100 with and without S9 mix in both experiments .

No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the fivetester strains was observed following treatment with Blue chamomilla - European origin at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.

Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.

In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.

Therefore, Blue chamomilla - European origin is considered to be non-mutagenic in thisSalmonella typhimuriumandEscherichia colireverse mutation assay.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Table 7.6/1: Summary of genotoxicity test

Test n°

Test / Guideline

Reliability

Focus

Strains tested

Metabolic activation

Test concentration

Statement

1

 

Schultz, 2018

Ames Test

(OECD 471)

K, rel. 1

Gene mutation

TA 1535,

TA 1537,

TA 98,

TA 100,

WP2 uvrA

-S9

+S9

Up to cytotoxic or highest recommended concentration

-S9 : non mutagenic

+S9 : non mutagenic

Justification for classification or non-classification

Harmonized classification:

The registered substance has no harmonized classification according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.

Self-classification:

Based on the available information, no classification is proposed.