Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 814-308-5 | CAS number: 63286-42-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Guideline stipulated by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ministry of the Environment (revised March 31st, 2011)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: September 2015; signature: November 2015
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (10E)-oxacycloheptadec-10-en-2-one
- EC Number:
- 814-308-5
- Cas Number:
- 63286-42-0
- Molecular formula:
- C16H28O2
- IUPAC Name:
- (10E)-oxacycloheptadec-10-en-2-one
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Liquid
- Storage condition of test material: In refrigerator (2-8°C) protected from light, container flushed with nitrogen. Use amber glassware or wrap container in
aluminum-foil
- Other: Colourless to pale yellow liquid
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 (direct plate assay): 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 μg/plate
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation assay): 52, 164, 512, 1600, 5000 μg/plate
Experiment 3 (pre-incubation assay): 52, 164, 512, 1600, 5000 μg/plate
Since the pre-incubation phase was not performed in closed vessels in experiment 2, a third experiment was perfomed within closed vessels. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethylsulfoxide
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: A solubility test was performed based on visual assessment. The test item was soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide. Test item concentrations were used within 3 hours of preparation.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: ICR-191 ; 2-aminoanthracene ; tert-butyl hydroperoxide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1. in medium; in agar (plate incorporation) ; Experiment 2. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation) ; Experiment 3 in medium; in agar (pre-incubation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1. Top agar in top agar tubes was melted by heating to 45 ± 2°C. The following solutions were successively added to 3 ml molten top agar: 0.1 ml of a fresh bacterial culture (10^9 cells/ml) of one of the tester strains, 0.1 ml of a dilution of the test item in DMSO and either 0.5 ml S9-mix (in case of activation assays) or 0.5 ml 0.1 M phosphate buffer (in case of non-activation assays). The ingredients were mixed on a Vortex and the content of the top agar tube was poured onto a selective agar plate. After solidification of the top agar, the plates were inverted and incubated in the dark at 37.0 ± 1.0°C for 48 ± 4 h. After this period revertant colonies were counted.
Experiment 2. Top agar in top agar tubes was melted by heating to 45 ± 2°C. The following solutions were
pre-incubated for 30 ± 2 minutes by 70 rpm at 37 ± 1°C, either 0.5 ml S9-mix (in case of activation assays) or 0.5 ml 0.1 M phosphate buffer (in case of non-activation assays), 0.1 ml of a fresh bacterial culture (10^9 cells/ml) of one of the tester strains, 0.1 ml of a dilution of the test item in DMSO. After the pre-incubation period the solutions were added to 3 ml molten top agar. The ingredients were mixed on a Vortex and the content of the top agar tube was poured onto a selective agar plate. After solidification of the top agar, the plates were inverted and incubated in the dark at 37.0 ± 1.0°C for 48 ± 4 h. After this period revertant colonies were counted.
Experiment 3. The same conditions as Experiment 2 was utilised in Experiment 3, except for the usage of closed vessels for the exposure.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (bacterial background lawn) and reduction in the number of revertants - Rationale for test conditions:
- Selection of an adequate range of doses was based on the first experiment (seven concentrations in triplicate) with all five tester strains, both with and without S9-mix considering cytotoxicity and precipitation. See tables for more information.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in the tester strain TA100 is not greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is not greater than three (3) times the concurrent vehicle control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow-up experiment.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in the tester strain TA100 is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is greater than three (3) times the concurrent vehicle control.
b) In case a follow up experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment. - Statistics:
- No formal hypothesis testing was done. See 'Any other information on materials and methods' and 'evaluation criteria' for details on the acceptability and evaluation criteria of the assay.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation:
Experiment 1: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at concentrations of 1600 µg/plate and upwards and at the top dose of 5000 µg/plate at the end of the incubation period.
Experiment 2: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at the concentration of 1600 µg/plate and upwards. Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the end of the incubation period in the absence of S9-mix at concentrations of 1600 µg/plate and upwards and in the presence of S9-mix at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
Experiment 3: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was not observed at the start of the incubation period and at the end of the incubation period at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Experiment 1 (direct plate assay) served as a range finding test in all species/strains for subsequent pre-incubation assays.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The negative control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges except the response for TA100 in the presence of S9-mix, Experiment 2. However since the mean number of revertant colonies showed a characteristic number of revertant colonies (50 revertant colonies) when compared against relevant historical control data (54 revertant colonies), the validity of the test was considered to be not affected.
The strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Dose range finding test: Mutagenic response of test substance in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay – Experiment 1
Dose (µg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and one Escherichia coli strain. |
||||||||||||||
|
TA1535 |
|
|
TA1537 |
|
|
TA98 |
|
|
TA100 |
|
|
WP2uvrA |
|
|
Without S9-mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control |
903 |
± 84 |
|
687 |
± 21 |
|
1161 |
± 161 |
|
765 |
± 47 |
|
953 |
± 72 |
|
Solvent control |
7 |
± 2 |
|
3 |
± 2 |
|
10 |
± 0 |
|
79 |
± 10 |
|
26 |
± 5 |
|
5.4 |
12 |
± 4 |
|
7 |
± 2 |
|
15 |
± 3 |
|
68 |
± 17 |
|
27 |
± 11 |
|
17 |
11 |
± 1 |
|
4 |
± 3 |
|
9 |
± 2 |
|
70 |
± 9 |
|
29 |
± 2 |
|
52 |
10 |
± 2 |
|
7 |
± 4 |
n |
13 |
± 1 |
|
67 |
± 14 |
|
27 |
± 4 |
|
164 |
9 |
± 6 |
|
3 |
±3 |
|
15 |
± 5 |
|
55 |
± 13 |
|
34 |
± 14 |
|
512 |
6 |
± 4 |
|
3 |
± 4 |
n |
8 |
± 5 |
|
8 |
± 5 |
|
27 |
± 3 |
|
1600 |
7 |
± 4 |
NP |
3 |
± 2 |
NP |
12 |
± 3 |
NP |
30 |
± 4 |
NP |
27 |
± 12 |
NP |
5000 |
5 |
± 1 |
n SP |
2 |
± 1 |
n SP |
8 |
± 5 |
n SP |
32 |
± 8 |
n SP |
28 |
± 3 |
n SP |
With S9-mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control |
903 |
± 84 |
687 |
± 21 |
1161 |
± 161 |
765 |
± 47 |
953 |
± 72 |
|||||
Solvent control |
7 |
± 2 |
3 |
± 2 |
10 |
± 0 |
79 |
± 10 |
26 |
± 5 |
|||||
5.4 |
12 |
± 4 |
7 |
± 2 |
15 |
± 3 |
68 |
± 17 |
27 |
± 11 |
|||||
17 |
11 |
± 1 |
4 |
± 3 |
9 |
± 2 |
70 |
± 9 |
29 |
± 2 |
|||||
52 |
10 |
± 2 |
7 |
± 4 |
n |
13 |
± 1 |
67 |
± 14 |
27 |
± 4 |
||||
164 |
9 |
± 6 |
3 |
± 3 |
15 |
± 5 |
55 |
± 13 |
34 |
± 14 |
|||||
512 |
6 |
± 4 |
3 |
± 4 |
n |
8 |
± 5 |
8 |
± 5 |
27 |
± 3 |
||||
1600 |
7 |
± 4 |
NP |
3 |
± 2 |
NP |
12 |
± 3 |
NP |
30 |
± 4 |
NP |
27 |
± 12 |
NP |
5000 |
5 |
± 1 |
n SP |
2 |
± 1 |
n SP |
8 |
± 5 |
n SP |
32 |
± 8 |
n SP |
28 |
± 3 |
n SP |
NP No precipitate
SP Slight Precipitate
N Normal bacterial background lawn
Table 2. Dose range finding test: Mutagenic response of test substance in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay – Experiment 2
Dose (µg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and one Escherichia coli strain. |
||||||||||||||
|
TA1535 |
|
|
TA1537 |
|
|
TA98 |
|
|
TA100 |
|
|
WP2uvrA |
|
|
Without S9-mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control |
991 |
± 91 |
|
161 |
± 25 |
|
1432 |
± 326 |
|
439 |
± 38 |
|
186 |
± 10 |
|
Solvent control |
12 |
± 5 |
|
5 |
± 4 |
|
22 |
± 8 |
|
63 |
± 5 |
|
22 |
± 4 |
|
52 |
7 |
± 3 |
n |
10 |
± 0 |
n |
17 |
± 5 |
n |
57 |
± 7 |
|
29 |
± 8 |
|
164 |
5 |
± 5 |
s |
7 |
± 4 |
s |
13 |
± 5 |
s |
55 |
± 6 |
n |
19 |
± 2 |
|
512 |
10 |
± 0 |
s NP |
5 |
± 4 |
m NP |
18 |
± 4 |
s NP |
27 |
± 8 |
s NP |
26 |
± 9 |
NP |
1600 |
5 |
s |
s SP |
2 |
± 2 |
m SP |
18 |
± 3 |
s SP |
31 |
± 3 |
s SP |
24 |
± 6 |
SP |
5000 |
7 |
± 4 |
s SP |
3 |
± 1 |
m SP |
12 |
± 3 |
s SP |
27 |
± 14 |
s SP |
21 |
± 6 |
n SP |
With S9-mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control |
166 |
± 8 |
162 |
± 17 |
692 |
± 157 |
1520 |
± 82 |
496 |
± 10 |
|||||
Solvent control |
7 |
± 3 |
4 |
± 1 |
28 |
± 4 |
50 |
± 3 |
32 |
± 11 |
|||||
52 |
11 |
± 5 |
7 |
± 2 |
29 |
± 7 |
56 |
± 6 |
32 |
± 10 |
|||||
164 |
9 |
± 9 |
8 |
± 2 |
n |
26 |
± 6 |
102 |
± 62 |
NP |
37 |
± 7 |
|||
512 |
11 |
± 1 |
NP |
4 |
± 1 |
s |
25 |
± 9 |
42 |
± 6 |
m |
42 |
± 3 |
||
1600 |
8 |
± 6 |
SP |
0 |
± 1 |
m NP |
16 |
± 2 |
NP |
36 |
± 13 |
m NP |
33 |
± 3 |
NP |
5000 |
7 |
± 2 |
n SP |
1 |
± 2 |
m SP |
14 |
± 6 |
n SP |
17 |
± 8 |
m SP |
30 |
± 5 |
n SP |
NP No precipitate
SP Slight Precipitate
m Bacterial background lawn moderately reduced
n Normal bacterial background lawn
s Bacterial background lawn slightly reduced
Table 3. Dose range finding test: Mutagenic response of test substance in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay – Experiment 3
Dose (µg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and one Escherichia coli strain. |
||||||||||||||
|
TA1535 |
|
|
TA1537 |
|
|
TA98 |
|
|
TA100 |
|
|
WP2uvrA |
|
|
Without S9-mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control |
873 |
± 72 |
|
200 |
± 23 |
|
974 |
± 80 |
|
876 |
± 44 |
|
176 |
± 32 |
|
Solvent control |
9 |
± 2 |
|
4 |
± 2 |
|
12 |
± 2 |
|
121 |
± 6 |
|
21 |
± 2 |
|
52 |
16 |
± 8 |
|
7 |
± 3 |
9 |
± 4 |
|
101 |
± 2 |
|
19 |
± 4 |
|
|
164 |
10 |
± 2 |
|
6 |
± 1 |
|
11 |
± 1 |
|
104 |
± 15 |
|
41 |
± 30 |
|
512 |
14 |
± 2 |
|
6 |
± 3 |
14 |
± 5 |
|
89 |
± 11 |
|
26 |
± 15 |
|
|
1600 |
8 |
± 1 |
n NP |
3 |
± 2 |
n NP |
9 |
± 3 |
n SP |
65 |
± 22 |
n NP |
19 |
± 6 |
NP |
5000 |
6 |
± 2 |
s SP i |
9 |
± 7 |
s SP |
20 |
± 4 |
s SP |
82 |
± 4 |
s SP |
19 |
± 1 |
n SP |
With S9-mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive control |
213 |
± 8 |
237 |
± 5 |
491 |
± 36 |
1689 |
± 121 |
564 |
± 15 |
|||||
Solvent control |
12 |
± 2 |
11 |
± 1 |
22 |
± 2 |
117 |
± 17 |
27 |
± 3 |
|||||
52 |
23 |
± 19 |
8 |
± 3 |
21 |
± 11 |
105 |
± 9 |
29 |
± 7 |
|||||
164 |
12 |
± 3 |
5 |
± 2 |
n |
18 |
± 6 |
93 |
± 10 |
n |
48 |
± 31 |
|||
512 |
14 |
± 9 |
NP |
5 |
± 2 |
s |
13 |
± 7 |
101 |
± 8 |
s |
30 |
± 3 |
||
1600 |
9 |
± 5 |
SP |
1 |
± 1 |
m NP |
13 |
± 1 |
n NP |
84 |
± 9 |
m NP |
33 |
± 4 |
NP |
5000 |
8 |
± 5 |
n SP |
5 |
± 5 |
m SP |
14 |
± 3 |
s SP |
48 |
± 15 |
m SP |
34 |
± 7 |
n SP |
NP No precipitate
SP Slight Precipitate
i Plate infected
m Bacterial background lawn moderately reduced
n Normal bacterial background lawn
s Bacterial background lawn slightly reduced
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
Under the conditions of this study, the test itme was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD TG 471, EU Method B.13/14 and the Japan Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity of Chemicals in accordance with GLP, to evaluate the mutagenic activity of the test substance in the Salmonella typhimurium and the Escherichia coli in a reverse mutation assay (with independent repeat; incorporating the plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods) in both the presence and absence of S-9 metabolic activation system. The test item was tested in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay with four histidine-requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537) and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay with a tryptophan-requiring strain of Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA). The test was performed in two independent experiments, at first a direct plate assay was performed and secondly a pre-incubation assay both in the absence and presence of S9-mix (rat liver S9-mix induced Aroclor 1254). An additional experiment in closed vessels using pre-incubation using similar to the second experiment. In the first mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA in the direct plate assay. The test item precipitated on the plates at dose level of 5000 μg/plate. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was observed in tester strains TA1537 and TA100. In the second mutation assay, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA in the pre-incubation assay. The test item was tested up to or beyond a precipitating dose level. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and/or a reduction of the bacterial background lawn, was observed in the absence of S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and in the presence of S9-mix in tester strains TA1537 and TA100. In the third mutation assay, the test item was tested within closed containers in the pre-incubation assay up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA. The test item precipitated on the plates at the dose level of 5000 μg/plate. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and/or a reduction of the bacterial background lawn, was observed in the in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Acceptable responses were obtained for the negative and strain-specific positive control items indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. The test item did not induce a toxicologically significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in two independently repeated experiments. Under the conditions of this study, it is concluded that that the test item was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.