Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 618-522-8 | CAS number: 9030-09-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Cyclomaltodextrin glucotransferase was tested for genotoxicity using the Ames assay.
No dose-related and reproducible increases in revertants to prototrophy were obtained with any of the bacterial strains exposed to CGTase, either in the presence or absence of S-9 mix. It was concluded, that the results of the experiments, described in this report, gave no indication of mutagenic activity of CGTase, batch PPA 4357 in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10-01-1994 to 10-05-1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine and tryptophan locus in the genome of four strains of bacteria.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 mix from Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary test: No preliminary trials were carried out.
Experiment 1: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 μg/mL.
Experiment 2: 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000, 10000 μg/mL. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle for enzyme: Purified water.
Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Substance is water-soluble and any human exposure will be in aqueous solutions.
Solvent for the positive control: Sterile water. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- other: N-methyl-N'-nitro-nitroso-guanidine, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Preincubation in suspension, followed by plating on agar plates (treat and plate method)
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): Not stated
DURATION
- Exposure duration, pre-incubation: The incubation mixtures were incubated with shaking at 37 ± 1°C for 3 hours (treat and plate).
- Incubation time (selective incubation): 64 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Viable cell count and observation of the bacterial background lawn. 0.1 ml aliquots of a 10^6 dilution of each bacterial suspension were poured on to Nutrient agar plates. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is considered as positive in the Salmonella reverse mutation assay when it has induced a statistically significant increase in revertant count compared with the appropriate solvent control in one or more strains of bacteria, in the presence
or absence of S9, if this response is dose-related or reproduced in an independent experiments. - Statistics:
- The numbers of revertants pr. plate were analysed by one-way analysis of variance for each test organism and each test series (1-way ANOVA performed 16 times). If the 1-way ANOVA gave some indications of significant intergroup differences, Dunnett's T-test were applied (one tail ed testing for any treatments significantly larger than the solvent control). The overall level of significance was alpha = 0.05.
All analysis were performed by means of the SAS statistical software package (PROC GLM). - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: Yes
- Precipitation: No issues were reported in this study.
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: Viability and gene type control
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: Yes
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: Not stated - Conclusions:
- No dose-related and reproducible increases in revertants to prototrophy were obtained with any of the bacterial strains exposed to CGTase, either in the presence or absence of S-9 mix. It was concluded, that the results of the experiments, described in this report, give no indication of mutagenic activity of CGTase, batch PPA 4357 in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
CGTase, batch PPA 4357 was examined for mutagenic activity using Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1535, TA100, TA1537 and TA98. A liquid culture assay was applied. Bacteria were exposed to 6 doses of the test substance up to 10000 μg/mL in a phosphate buffered nutrient broth for 3 hours. After incubation, the test substance was removed by centrifugation prior to plating. The number of revertants to prototrophy and viable cells were estimated. The test was conducted in the presence and absence of metabolic activation - a liver preparation from male rats, pre-treated with Aroclor 1254, and the co-factors required for mixed function oxidase activity (S-9 mix). The sensitivity of the individual bacterial strains was confirmed by significant increases in number of revertant colonies induced in similar conditions by diagnostic mutagens. All results were confirmed by conducting two independent experiments.
No dose-related and reproducible increases in revertants to prototrophy were obtained with any of the bacterial strains exposed to CGTase, either in the presence or absence of S-9 mix. It was concluded, that the results of the experiments, described in this report, give no indication of mutagenic activity of CGTase, batch PPA 4357 in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Reference
Some statistical significance in reverant colonies was attained for TA100 in the presence of S-9 mix for the 3 highest concentration in experiment 1, however, this was not reproducible in experiment 2.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Not classified.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.