Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2005-10-18 to 2005-10-19
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Non-GLP, well documented study according to INVITTOX Protocol n. 98 ("Bovine Corneal Opacity Score and Permeability Assay") and BCO-P SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005
Report date:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: INVITTOX Protocol no. 98 "Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay", dated February 1994
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCO-P) SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK, Procedure Details, April 1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
6-FLUORO-3-(PIPERIDIN-4-YL)-1,2-BENZOXAZOLE HYDROCHLORIDE
EC Number:
700-303-4
Cas Number:
84163-13-3
Molecular formula:
C12H13FN2O.HCl
IUPAC Name:
6-FLUORO-3-(PIPERIDIN-4-YL)-1,2-BENZOXAZOLE HYDROCHLORIDE
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: IRA091
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Purity test date: no data

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature (range of 20 ± 5°C), light protected
- Stability under test conditions: no data
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: no data

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- The test item was tested at a concentration of 20% in saline. Strong stirring with a magnetic stirrer resulted in a suspension. Until administration, the suspension was stirred with a magnetic stirrer.

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: bovine eyes
Strain:
other: not applicable
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Abattoir Basel, Schlachthofstrasse 55, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland
- Number of animals: no data
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): no data

COLLECTION OF BOVINE EYES:
Freshly isolated bovine eyes were collected from the abattoir. After excess tissue was removed from the excised eyes, they were stored at room temperature in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution containing penicillin/streptomycin and then transported for further preparation. The eyes were delivered the day before treatment and the isolated cordeas were stored over night in a preservation medium in a refrigirator.

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- amount applied: 0.75 mL
- Concentration: 20% suspension in saline

NEGATIVE CONTROL/VEHICLE
- amount applied: 0.75 mL
- concentration: 0.9%

POSITIVE CONTROL
- amount applied: 0.75 mL
- Concentration: 20% in saline
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes at 32 ± 1°C
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
After the final opacity measurement was performed, the corneas were incubated for about 90 minutes in a water-bath at at 32 ± 2°C and permeability measurement was performed.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
9 corneas (3 test item replicates, 3 negative controls, 3 positive controls)
Details on study design:
PREPARATION OF THE CORNEAS:
All eyes were carefully examined macroscopically for defects. Those presenting defects such as vascularization, pigmentation, opacity, and scratches were discarded. Each cornea was dissected from the eye using scalpel and rounded scissors. A rim of about 2-3 mm of tissue (sclera) was left for stability and handling of the isolated cornea. All corneas used in the experiment were collected in complete minimum essential medium (cMEM) and were checked finally with a view box for the defects listed before. Since the bovine eyes were delivered in the afternoon, corneas were stored in a preservation medium over night in a refrigerator at about 4°C. The preservation medium was composed of Medium 199 supplemented with L-glutamine, Na-bicarbonate and Taurine. Shortly before use, dextran was added. Each cornea was mounted in a cornea holder with the endothelial side against the sealing ring (O-ring) of the posterior part of the holder. The cornea was gently flattened over the O-ring but stretching had to be avoided. After the anterior part of the holder was positioned on the top of the cornea and fixed in place with screws, both compartments of the holder were filled with cMEM. The posterior compartment had to be filled to return the cornea to its natural convex position. Care must be taken to assure no air bubbles were present within the compartments.
For equilibration, the corneas in the holder were incubated for about one hour at 32°C +/- 2°C in a waterbath. At the end of the incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced by fresh cMEM, and the basal opacity was determined (t0min). For measurement, the posterior compartment was plugged while the anterior compartment remained unplugged.

TREATMENT METHOD
Fresh cMEM was filled into the posterior compartment, while the anterior compartment received test item solution or negative or positive control evenly distributed on the surface of the corneas. During the whole experiment, cornea holders and medium were maintained in a water-bath at at 32 ± 2°C.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
he test item was rinsed off from the application side by changing cMEM several times until precipitates of the test item could be observed no longer, fresh cMEM was replaced in both compartments and opacity was measured (t240min).

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS
- Corneal opacity: The opacitometer was calibrated with a standardized opaque polyester sheet as described in the manual and the opacity of each of the corneas was determined by reading each holder placed in the photoreceptor compartment for treated cornea. After recording the basal opacity of all corneas, the mean value of all corneas was calculated. No cornea deviated from this by more than +/-3 units and no cornea was discarded.
The change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive or negative control corneas was calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading, for each individual cornea (t240min-t0min). The average change in opacity of the negative control corneas was calculated and this value subtracted form the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity. The mean corrected opacity value of each treatment group was than calculated form the individual corrected opacity values of the treated corneas for each treatment condition.

- Corneal permeability: Following the opacity readings after treatment, the permeability endpoint was measured as an indication of the integrity of the epithelial cell sheets. After the final opacity measurement was performed, the medium was removed from the anterior compartment and replaced by 1 mL of a fluorescein solution. Corneas were incubated again in a horizontal position for about 90 minutes in a water-bath at 32°C +/-2°C. Medium from the posterior compartment was removed with a 5 mL syringe, well mixed and transferred to a cuvette of 10 mm path length and the optical density at 490 nm (OD490) was determined with a spectrophotometer.
The corrected OD490 value of each treated cornea or positive control cornea was calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea. The mean corrected permeability values of each treatment group was calculated from the individual corrected permeability values of the treated corneas for each treatment condition.

IN VITRO SCORE CALCULATION:
The following formula was used to determine the in vitro score:
in vitro score = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
The in vitro score was calculated for each individual treatment and positive control cornea. The mean in vitro score value of each treated group was calculated from the individual in vitro score values.
- negative control:
in vitro score = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
- Positive control and test item cornea:
in vitro score = corrected opacity value + (15 x corrected OD490 value)

Depending on the score obtained, the test item was classified into one of the following categories:
in vitro score 0 - 3: non eye irritant
in vitro score 3.1 - 25: mild eye irritant
in vitro score 25.1 - 55: moderate eye irritant
in vitro score 55.1 - 80: severe eye irritant
in vitro score > 80.1: very severe eye irritant

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
test item after 240 minutes of treatment
Value:
5.9
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Remarks:
Test item IVIS range: 5.0 to 6.5
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
test item after 240 minutes of treatment
Value:
5
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: test item opacity score range: 4.7 to 5.7
Irritation parameter:
other: permeability value
Run / experiment:
test item after 240 minutes of treatment
Value:
0.058
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: test item permeability range: 0.019 to 0.103
Other effects / acceptance of results:
mean in vitro irritancy score (range):
negative control: -0.7 +/- 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6)
positive control: 102.9 +/- 12.4 (92.5 to 116.6)

mean opacity scores (range):
negative control: -0.3 +/- 0.6 (0 to 1)
positive control: 66.0 +/- 11.5 (54.7 to 77.7)

mean permeability scores (range):
negative control: 0.026 +/- 0.011 (0.019 to 0.039)
positive control: 2.462 +/- 0.173 (2.267 to 2.595)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Before starting the permeability test, the dye solution sodium fluorescein was checked for its quality. The dye solution is valid for use, if a dilution of the stock solution containing 10 μg/mL showed an optical density (OD490) of 1.610 to 1.910. The value found by spectroscopy was 1.777.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
The IVIS score of the T001492 was found to be 5.9 +/- 0.8. According to the criteria of the CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, no prediction on the classification can be made.
Under the INIVTTOX Protocol: the test item is considered to be mild eye irritant.