Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
A Toxicity Study of Parenteral Thiamine Hydrochloride
Author:
Wrenn et al.
Year:
1989
Bibliographic source:
Ann Emerg Med. 18:867-870

Materials and methods

Endpoint addressed:
other: repeated dose toxicity: other routes
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The safety of the test substance was evaluated after administration intravenously as a 100 mg bolus in 989 consecutive patients. In total 1070 doses were administered. Four patients received large-dose thiamine for overt Wernicke's encephalopathy; two received 1 g in multiple 100 mg boluses and two received 300 mg in multiple 100 mg boluses within the first few hours of being seen. For purposes of analysis, these were considered single doses. There were 39 instances (3.9% of the total population) in which individual patients received between two and seven individual doses over the entire study period. One patient received seven doses, two received six, three received five, two received four, 16 received three, and 15 received two doses.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Thiamine hydrochloride
EC Number:
200-641-8
EC Name:
Thiamine hydrochloride
Cas Number:
67-03-8
Molecular formula:
C12H17N4OS.ClH.Cl
IUPAC Name:
3-[(4-amino-2-methylpyrimidin-5-yl)methyl]-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methyl-1,3-thiazol-3-ium chloride hydrochloride

Method

Type of population:
other: patients
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 989 patients
- Sex: 795 men (80%) and 194 women (20%)
- Age: 16 - 80 years
- Known diseases: alcoholism (65%), alcohol withdrawal (0.9%), alcoholic seizure (13%), alcoholic hypoglycemia (0.8%), seizures (7%), hypoglycemia (1%), hypothermia (1%), malnutrition (0.3%), cancer (0.1%), cocaine (0.2%), AIDS (0.8%), altered mental status (0.9%), sepsis ( 0.1%), drug overdose (0.7%), dehydration (0.2%), hypertension (0.1%), nausea or vomiting (0.5%), cerebrovascular accident (0.2%) and unknown (7%)
Ethical approval:
confirmed, but no further information available
Route of exposure:
other: intravenous (IV bolus)
Reason of exposure:
intentional
Details on exposure:
Over a 6-month period, 1070 doses of the test substance were administered by rapid IV push technique to 989 patients. Four patients received large-dose thiamine for overt Wernicke's encephalopathy; two received 1 g in multiple 100 mg boluses and two received 300 mg in multiple 100 mg boluses within the first few hours of being seen. For purposes of analysis, these were considered single doses
Examinations:
Cardiac monitor: 94 patients were incidentally on a cardiac monitor at the time of the study.

Results and discussion

Clinical signs:
Adverse reactions were observed in 12 cases (1.1%). In 11 of the cases, transient burning occurred immediately after injection in the arm with the IV line and lasted from seconds to minutes. The authors considered this a minor reaction with no allergic or immune component. Of these 11 patients, seven were men and four were women (1.75:1 ratio). The 12th case, transient generalized pruritus without any other associated symptoms was observed in the patient; the authors considered this a potentially major reaction. The rates of minor and major reactions, therefore, were 1.02 and 0.093%, respectively. No adverse systemic effects were reported.
Results of examinations:
Cardiac monitor: No arrhythmias were noted.

Applicant's summary and conclusion