Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 937-924-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Partition coefficient
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
- Version / remarks:
- The study is conducted in accordance with the following guidelines:
• OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Method No. 117, adopted 13. April 2004: “Partition Coefficient (n-octanol/water), High Performance Liquid Chromatog-raphy (HPLC) Method“
• Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30. May 2008, published 31. May 2008, Method A.8 “Partition Coefficient“
• Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/266 of adopted 7 December 2015 amending Regu-lation EC No. 440/2008, Method A.24 “Partition Coefficient (N-OCTANOL/WATER), HIGH PERFORMANCELIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC) METHOD - Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient - HPLC Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- HPLC method
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Analytical method:
- high-performance liquid chromatography
- Key result
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- >= 0.3 - < 1.43
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- pH:
- >= 5 - <= 6
- Conclusions:
- Variations in the retention times of reference items and test item are very small. Therefore a stable configuration of the HPLC-column can be assumed.
The correlation log k/Log POW is acceptable: the coefficient of determination r2 was calcu-lated with 0.9616. This value was considered as sufficiently high to use the calibration function for the determination of the log POW of the test item Blendazol Orange Blendwell.
The log POW of peak 1 was not calculable, because the retention time lay below the retention time of thiourea. As the calculated log POW of peak 2 lay below the lowest log POW of the reference items (2-Butanone with log POW 0.3), the log POW of this peak is stat-ed as < 0.3. The log POW of peaks 3 to 5 lay in the range of the reference items.
The log POW of Blendazol Orange Blendwell is stated as < 0.3 – 2.77 (mean) therefore.
No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The log POW of peaks 2 to 5 lay in the range of the reference items - Executive summary:
The partition coefficient was determined using the HPLC method according to the EU A.8 test guideline and using HPLC as the analytical method. The partition coefficient was determined in triplicate, at 25˚C obtaining a value (log Pow)
as < 0.3– 2.77 therefore.
Reference
1.1.1 Calculated Values
The calculated values are presented in the following table:
Table9.2‑b Capacity Factor, log Capacity Factor, logOW
Peak |
Measurement No. |
k |
log k |
log POW |
1 |
1 |
-0.1083 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
2 |
-0.0968 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
3 |
-0.0968 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
Mean |
|
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
2 |
1 |
0.1103 |
-0.9574 |
-0.744 |
2 |
0.0931 |
-1.0313 |
-0.917 |
|
3 |
0.0815 |
-1.0886 |
-1.050 |
|
Mean |
|
|
-0.904 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.153 |
|
3 |
1 |
0.9444 |
-0.0248 |
1.431 |
2 |
0.9386 |
-0.0275 |
1.424 |
|
3 |
0.9386 |
-0.0275 |
1.424 |
|
Mean |
|
|
1.426 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.004 |
|
4 |
1 |
1.7382 |
0.2401 |
2.048 |
2 |
1.7210 |
0.2358 |
2.038 |
|
3 |
1.7152 |
0.2343 |
2.035 |
|
Mean |
|
|
2.041 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.007 |
|
5 |
1 |
3.5847 |
0.5545 |
2.782 |
2 |
3.5214 |
0.5467 |
2.764 |
|
3 |
3.4812 |
0.5417 |
2.752 |
|
Mean |
|
|
2.766 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.015 |
*not calculable, because k is negative. The retention time of peak 1 is lower than the retention time of thiourea, which was used for the determination of the dead time of the method
log POWwas calculated from the capacity factor as follows:
log POW= (log k + 0.6382) / 0.4288
Description of key information
The study was performed using a HPLC with a C18 column. Seven reference items with different retention times and thiourea for the determination of the dead time were used to produce a calibration curve, since retention time on hydrophobic columns and POWare correlated. The reference items were chosen on behalf of the pre-test.
One vial was filled with the reference item mix and one vial
with the test item solution. The vials were analysed using the HPLC with
the program described below. First one injection from the solvent blank
methanol/water 65/35 (%v/v) was made. Then three injections were
measured from the reference item mix, three injections from the test
item and again three injections from the reference item mix.
For each reference item, the capacity factor K was
calculated from the retention time of thiourea and the retention time of
the respective reference item.
A calibration function (log K versus log POW, linear fit) was determined using the literature values for POWof the reference items and the retention times in the six determinations.
The test item solution in mobile phase showed a chromatogram with five peaks. Peak 4 and 5 showed a relative area > 5 % each.
With the calibration function log K versus log POW, the corresponding log POWvalues of the peaks were determined with:
Peak |
Mean Area |
Relative Area [%] |
Mean Retention Time [min] |
log POW |
1 |
13.3187 |
54.66 |
1.303 |
n.c.* |
2 |
5.5644 |
22.69 |
1.586 |
-0.904** |
3 |
4.4508 |
17.76 |
2.811 |
1.426 |
4 |
0.3604 |
1.48 |
3.947 |
2.041*** |
5 |
0.8365 |
3.42 |
6.561 |
2.766*** |
* not calculable, because k is negative.
** The retention time of peak 1 is lower than the retention time of
thiourea, which was used for the determination of the dead time of the
method
*** Minor peak with relative peak area < 5 %
These values are the means ± standard deviations of three independent determinations.
Using the correlation log k / log POW, the log POWof four components of the test itemBlendazol Orange Blendwell was calculated. The log POWof peak 1 was not calculable, because the retention time lay below the retention time of thiourea.As the calculatedlog POWof peak 2 lay below the lowestlog POWof the reference items (2-Butanone withlog POW0.3), thelog POWof peaks 1 and 2 is stated as < 0.3.The log POWof peaks 3 – 5 lay in the range of the reference items. Peaks 4 and 5 were considered as minor peaks with relative peak area < 5 %.
Thereforethelog POWofBlendazol Orange Blendwellis stated as
< 0.3– 1.43
[1]mAU = milli absorbance units
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Log Kow (Log Pow):
- 0.3
- at the temperature of:
- 25 °C
Additional information
1.1 Test Item Blendazol Orange Blendwell
1.1.1 Measurement Data
The retention times of the test item are presented in the following table:
Table9.2‑a Retention Times (RT) Test Item
Measurement |
RT 1 |
RT 2 |
RT 3 |
RT 4 |
RT 5 |
|
min. |
min. |
min. |
min. |
min. |
Measurement 1 |
1.292 |
1.609 |
2.817 |
3.967 |
6.642 |
Measurement 2 |
1.309 |
1.584 |
2.809 |
3.942 |
6.550 |
Measurement 3 |
1.309 |
1.567 |
2.809 |
3.934 |
6.492 |
Mean |
1.303 |
1.586 |
2.811 |
3.947 |
6.561 |
Standard Deviation |
0.010 |
0.021 |
0.005 |
0.017 |
0.076 |
1.1.1 Calculated Values
The calculated values are presented in the following table:
Table9.2‑b Capacity Factor, log Capacity Factor, logOW
Peak |
Measurement No. |
k |
log k |
log POW |
1 |
1 |
-0.1083 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
2 |
-0.0968 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
3 |
-0.0968 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
Mean |
|
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
2 |
1 |
0.1103 |
-0.9574 |
-0.744 |
2 |
0.0931 |
-1.0313 |
-0.917 |
|
3 |
0.0815 |
-1.0886 |
-1.050 |
|
Mean |
|
|
-0.904 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.153 |
|
3 |
1 |
0.9444 |
-0.0248 |
1.431 |
2 |
0.9386 |
-0.0275 |
1.424 |
|
3 |
0.9386 |
-0.0275 |
1.424 |
|
Mean |
|
|
1.426 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.004 |
|
4 |
1 |
1.7382 |
0.2401 |
2.048 |
2 |
1.7210 |
0.2358 |
2.038 |
|
3 |
1.7152 |
0.2343 |
2.035 |
|
Mean |
|
|
2.041 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.007 |
|
5 |
1 |
3.5847 |
0.5545 |
2.782 |
2 |
3.5214 |
0.5467 |
2.764 |
|
3 |
3.4812 |
0.5417 |
2.752 |
|
Mean |
|
|
2.766 |
|
Standard Deviation |
|
|
0.015 |
*not calculable, because k is negative. The retention time of peak 1 is lower than the retention time of thiourea, which was used for the determination of the dead time of the method
log POWwas calculated from the capacity factor as follows:
log POW= (log k + 0.6382) / 0.4288
1.1.1 Validity
The validity criteria and results are presented in the following table:
Table9.3‑a Validity Criteria and Results
Peak |
Parameter |
Criterion |
Found |
Assessment |
1 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
Value within Range of Reference Items |
0.30 - 3.60 |
n.c.* |
n.c.* |
|
2 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.306 |
not valid |
Value within Range of Reference Items |
0.30 - 3.60 |
-0.904 |
not valid** |
|
3 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.006 |
valid |
Value within Range of Reference Items |
0.30 - 3.60 |
1.426 |
valid |
|
4 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.013 |
valid |
Value within Range of Reference Items |
0.30 - 3.60 |
2.041 |
valid |
|
5 |
Range (Max – Min. log POW) |
< 0.1 |
0.030 |
valid |
Value within Range of Reference Items |
0.30 - 3.60 |
2.766 |
valid |
*not calculable, because k is negative. The retention time of peak 1 is lower than the retention time of thiourea, which was used for the determination of the dead time of the method. As the retention time of peak 1 lies below the lowestretention timeof the reference items (2-Butanone withlog POW0.3), thelog POWof this peak is stated as < 0.3.
** As the calculatedlog POWof peak 2 lies below the lowestlog POWof the reference items (2-Butanone withlog POW0.3), thelog POWof this peak is stated as < 0.3.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
