Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Hazard for aquatic organisms

Freshwater

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Marine water

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

STP

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Sediment (freshwater)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Sediment (marine water)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Hazard for air

Air

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for terrestrial organisms

Soil

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Hazard for predators

Secondary poisoning

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no potential to cause toxic effects if accumulated (in higher organisms) via the food chain

Additional information

Conclusion on classification

The only study available is an acute fish study according to EU method C.1.

Taking into account the determined effect values after 96h, based on nominal concentrations, i.e. LC50, LC0, EC50, EC0 = resp. >= 1 mg/L, based on mortality resp. swimming behaviour, the substance does not need to be classified as aquatic acute cat. 1 according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. Since 1 mg/L (nominal) was the only concentration tested, a classification as aquatic chronic cat. 2 or lower can not be categorically excluded. However, this concentration resulted in precipitation, i.e. it is above the water solubility of the substance. Based on the procedure as described in the test report, the test solutions need to be considered as a WAF. Hence, it can be assumed that the observed effects, i.e. actually the lacking of mortality or behavioural abnormalities, was observed at concentrations maximally as high as the substance water solubility and the actual LC50 would virtually be above the water solubility of the substance. In this case, referring to the actual concentration, the safety net classification as aquatic chronic cat. 4 would be triggered.