Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2000
Report date:
2000

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Proposed Local Lymph Node Assay protocol prepared by the Interagency Coordinating Committee for Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) Immunotoxicology Working Group (IWG): National Institutes of Health Publication N° 99-449, Appendix J, 1999
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
other: Amber Liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Kathon™ 886
- Physical state: Amber liquid
- Stability under test conditions: stable at room temperature
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Rohm and Haas Company, Batch No. 6110C010

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: Stable at room temperature
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle:
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium:

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: Dilution in acetone:olive oil (4:1, v/v)
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: 0, 30, 50, 70, 90, 360, 1000 ppm a.i.

OTHER SPECIFICS: Purity of test material was 14%

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/J
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
- Age at study initiation: 68 days old.
- Weight at study initiation: 19.4 to 24.9 g

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:l v/v)
Concentration / amount:
25 ul of 0, 30, 50, 70, 90, 360, 1000 ppm a.i.
Day(s)/duration:
3 days
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: Once a day for 3 consecutive days.
- Concentrations: 25 uL; 0, 30, 50, 70, 90, 360, 1000 ppm a.i. TS.

Challenge controls:
Control groups were treated with the vehicle acetone:olive oil (4:1, v/v)
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
20 % hexylcinnamaldehyde in acetone/olive oil (4:1, v/v)

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
0, 30, 50, 70, 90, 360, 1000 ppm a.i. TS.
No. of animals per dose:
5
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
n/a

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
> 3
Test group / Remarks:
>= 30 ppm
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
> 3
Test group / Remarks:
>= 0.6 microgram a.i./cm2

Any other information on results incl. tables

Detailed information including induction/challenge/scoring schedule for skin sensitisation test

Inductions

LLNA

Observations/Remarks

 

Day of treatment

Application

 

Induction

1, 2, 3

Topical

None

3H-thymidine

6

Injection

None

Result of skin sensitisation test

Treatment

Measured dose

DPM (mean)

SI (Test/control Ratio)

Results1

Untreated control

0 ppm

160

--

--

Acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)

0 ppm

225

1.0

negative

CMI/MI

30 ppm

776 *

3.4

positive

CMI/MI

50 ppm

1047 *

4.7

positive

CMI/MI

70 ppm

953 *

4.2

positive

CMI/MI

90 ppm

1507 *

6.7

positive

CMI/MI

360 ppm

4612 *

20.5

positive

CMI/MI

1000 ppm

10241 **

45.5

positive

Hexylcinnamaldehyde

20 %

1985 *

8.8

positive

1Test/control Ratio of 3.0 or greater represents a positive result.

* Statistically significant difference compared to the vehicle control group (p<0.05).

** Statistically significant difference compared to the vehicle control group (p<0.01).

-- Not applicable.

DPM = disintegrations per minute.

SI = stimulation index.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1A (indication of significant skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Sensitizer at concentrations greater than 30 ppm a.i. [0.6 microgram a.i./cm2].
Executive summary:

This study was conducted in compliance withthe proposed Local Lymph Node Assay protocol prepared by the Interagency Coordinating Committee for Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) Immunotoxicology Working Group (IWG): National Institutes of Health Publication N°: 99-449, Appendix J, 1999. There were no Local Lymph Node Assay standard protocol (ICCVAM) deviations.

All concentrations evaluated produced a stimulation index greater than or equal to 3. The results of the study indicate that the test material CMIT/MIT, under the conditions of thestandard protocol (ICCVAM) and according to currently accepted criteria, exhibits a statistically significant, generally dose-related potential to induce contact hypersensitivity in mice.