Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Phototransformation in soil

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
phototransformation in soil
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1985
Report date:
1985

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Radiolabeled test materials (with the radiolabel either on the phenyl or on the pyrimidine moiety) were applied to Flanagan silt loam soil and exposed to natural sunlight for 32 days (mid-August through mid-September. 1985).
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
Purity: not reported
Radiolabelling:
yes

Study design

Analytical monitoring:
no
Analytical method:
liquid chromatography
Details on soil:
Characteristics of Flanagan soil (Silt loam): Sand = 4%; Silt = 81%; Clay = 15%; Organic matter = 4.3% and pH = 5.8 and Cation exchange capacity = 23.2 meg/100g
Light source:
other: Four photolysis box units
Light spectrum: wavelength in nm:
285 - 2 800
Duration of test at given test condition
Duration:
32 d
Reference substance:
no
Dark controls:
yes

Results and discussion

Dissipation half-life of parent compoundopen allclose all
Key result
DT50:
20 d
Test condition:
irradiated sample
Key result
DT50:
> 43 - < 46 d
Test condition:
dark controls
Transformation products:
yes
Identity of transformation productsopen allclose all
No.:
#1
Reference
Reference substance name:
Unnamed
No.:
#2
Reference
Reference substance name:
Unnamed

Any other information on results incl. tables

Composition and distribution of radioactivity recovered from soil

Photolysis samples treated with [pyrimidine-2-14c] DPX-F6025 (percent of total 14C normalized to total 14C recovered equal to 100%)

 

Day

Solar Energy (watt-hr/m2)

DPX-F6025

Pyrimidinamine (a)

Unknown (b)

Other (c)

Unextracted

0

0

95

2

0

2

Not determined

7

30,513

72

13

0

7

3

14

65,316

66

12

0

10

8

21

98,802

44

37

0

2

10

32

154,497

31

50

0

0

12

 

Day

Solar Energy (watt-hr/m2)

DPX-F6025

Pyrimidinamine (a)

Unknown (b)

Other (c)

Unextracted

7 (Dark)

-----

87

8

0

2

1

14 (Dark)

-----

84

4

9

1

2

21 (Dark)

-----

66

14

14

1

2

32 (Dark)

-----

60

17

18

1

4

(a) 4-Chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinamine

(b) Unidentified product appearing only in dark control samples. The product failed to form in an

     attempted large scale preparation to obtain a sample for characterization.

(c)Sum of unidentified labeled products, none of which is more than3%.

 

Composition and distribution of radioactivity recovered soil from photolysis samples treated with [phenyl-14c] DPX-F6025

(percent of total 14C normalized to total 14C recovered equal to 100%)

 

Day

Solar Energy (watt-hr/m2)

DPX-F6025

Sulfonamide (d)

Saccharin

CO2

Other (e)

Unextracted

0

0

92

1

3

---

2

Not determined

7

30,513

74

12

3

0

4

4

14

65,316

46

31

7

1

1

8

21

98,802

48

35

2

1

2

8

32

154,497

29

48

3

2

1

12

 

Day

Solar Energy (watt-hr/m2)

DPX-F6025

Sulfonamide (d)

Saccharin

CO2

Other (e)

Unextracted

7 (Dark)

-----

80

9

3

0

3

3

14 (Dark)

-----

71

18

4

0

1

5

21 (Dark)

-----

60

30

1

0

2

6

32 (Dark)

-----

55

35

1

0

2

5

 

(d) Ethyl 2-aminosulfonylbenzoate

(e)Sum of unidentified labeled products, none of which is more than3%.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Degradation of the test substance occurred approximately twice as fast in the presence of sunlight compared to the dark controls: the first half-life was approximately 20 days in irradiated samples vs. 43-46 days in the dark controls. The major radiolabeled compounds were 4-chloro-6-methoxy- 2-pyrimidinamine and ethyl 2-amino-sulfonylbenzoate. These are the expected products of hydrolytic cleavage of the sulfonylurea bridge of the test substance.
Executive summary:

Radiolabeled test materials (with the radiolabel either on the phenyl or on the pyrimidine moiety) were applied to Flanagan silt loam soil and exposed to natural sunlight for 32 days (mid-August through mid-September, 1985).

Degradation of the test substance occurred approximately twice as fast in the presence of sunlight compared to the dark controls: the first half-life was approximately 20 days in irradiated samples vs. 43-46 days in the dark controls. The major radiolabeled compounds were 4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinamine and ethyl 2-amino-sulfonylbenzoate. These are the expected products of hydrolytic cleavage of the sulfonylurea bridge of the test substance.