Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-403-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation in vitro:
Ames test:
The test chemical Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Chromosome aberration study:
The test chemical Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate does not induce gene mutation in mammalian cell lines in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- experimental data of read across substances
- Justification for type of information:
- Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE report is based on three gene mutation in vitro toxicity studies as- 1., 2. The Ames Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity test was conducted for the test chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535
- Remarks:
- RA 1
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 metabolic activation system
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1/2. 5–5000 μg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- 1 and 2. No data3. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Yes, no detailed data available - Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: No data available
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- RA 1
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-aminofluorene for all the strains with S9 mix
- Remarks:
- RA 2
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 1 and 2. METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) with preincubation modificationDURATION- Preincubation period: No data available- Exposure duration: 48 h - Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data availableSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data availableSPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data availableSTAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data availableNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: TriplicateNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data availableDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Yes, the cytotoxicity study were carried out by accounting for the microcolonies(histidine auxotroph) in the background lawn. The sparse or absent growth indicated the toxic nature of dyes toward the tester strains.OTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data available- Determination of endoreplication: No data available- Other: No data availableOTHER: No data available
- Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- 1 and 2. A dose-related increase (at least 2-fold) in revertant colonies was used to define a statistically significant mutagenic response.
- Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535
- Remarks:
- RA 1
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- ≥ 500 μg
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535
- Remarks:
- RA 2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- ≥ 500 μg
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No data
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Data available for the test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate. The studies are as mentioned below:
Ames mutagenicity test was conducted for two test chemicals to evaluate its genotoxic effects when exposed to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535 with dose concentration of 5–5000 µg/plate in plate incorporation assay. The plates were incubated for 48 h. The doses of test chemical, together with the appropriate concurrent positive controls, were tested in triplicate on each tester strain with and without S9 metabolic activation. A dose-related increase (at least 2-fold) in revertant colonies was used to define a statistically significant mutagenic response. Both the test chemicals did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimuriumTA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535 both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to be a gene mutant.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE derived based on the experimental data from structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- 1. Thymidine kinase (TK) locus2. hprt locus in CHO-K1-BH4 cells and the gpt locus in AS52 cells
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/- 3.7.C / 1
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The cells were grown in Fischer’s medium for leukemic cells of mice supplemented with 10% horse serum and 0.02% pluronic F-68.- Properly maintained: No data available - Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data available- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: No data available
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO-K1-BH4 and CHO-AS52 / 2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: No data- Properly maintained: Yes- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: No data- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: No data
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague- Dawley rats.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1. 0.001-6 µg/mL2. 250-3000 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- 1.- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in water2. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 3-methylcholanthrene and dimethylbenz[a]- anthracene (+S9)
- Remarks:
- 1
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- 2
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 1, METHOD OF APPLICATION: in mediumCells at start: 6000000 cellsDURATION- Preincubation period: No data available- Exposure duration: 4 h- Expression time (cells in growth medium):48 h- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data availableSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 1×106 cells/plate for mutant selectionSPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data availableSTAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data availableNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: DuplicateNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 X 106 cells/plate for mutant selection and 200cells/plate for viable count determinations DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated culturesOTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data available- Determination of endoreplication: No data available- Other: No data availableOTHER: No data available2. METHOD OF APPLICATION: in mediumCells at the strat of experiment: 1 X 106 cells/100-mm dishDURATION- Preincubation period: No data- Exposure duration: 5 hrs- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 7 daysSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No dataSPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No dataSTAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No dataNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: TriplicateNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No dataDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Yes, Parallel culturesof 400 cells/60-mm dish were established for cytotoxicity determinationOTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data- Determination of endoreplication: No data- Other: No dataOTHER: No data2,Details on test system and conditionsMETHOD OF APPLICATION: in mediumDURATION- Preincubation period: No data available- Exposure duration: 4 h- Expression time (cells in growth medium):48 h
- Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- 1 . Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase. Doubling of the mutant frequency was previously reported as representing a positive effect. Only doses yielding total growth values of 10% were used in the analysis of induced mutant frequency. Doses yielding less than 10% total growth were used in determining dose response.2. Results were expressed as 6-thioguanine resistant mutants/106 clonable cells.
- Statistics:
- Not specified
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/- 3.7.C / 1
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO-K1-BH4 and CHO-AS52
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No data
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate does not induce gene mutation in mammalian cell lines in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Data for the various test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino] phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate. The studies are as mentioned below:
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of structurally and functionally similar test chemical.The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 0.001 -6 µg/mL of the test chemical. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase The test chemical did not induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence andabsence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Mammalian cell gene mutation assay was conducted to evaluate the genotoxic potential of the test chemical. The study was performed using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell strain CHO-K1-BH4and CHO-AS52 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The test chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used at dose levels of0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 µg/ml without S9 and 0, 0.10, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.40, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50 µg/ml with S9. 1X 106cells/100 mm dish were exposed to the test chemical for 5 hrs in serum-free nutrient mixture F12. After treatment, cells were washed with Ca+ +/Mgt +-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and allowed to recover overnight in fresh F12 medium with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were then plated in F12 medium with 5% FBS and incubated for 7 days with three passages to permit expression of induced mutants. Parallel cultures of 400 cells/60-mm dish were also established for cytotoxicity determination. At the end of the phenotypic expression period, 2 X 106cells were plated at a concentration of 2 X 105celIs/100-mm dish in hypoxanthine-free F12 containing 5% dialyzed FBS and 10 µM 6-thioguanine. Cloning efficiency cultures, grown in medium without 6-thioguanine, had 200 cells/60-mm plate. All cultures were incubated for 7 days before colonies were fixed, stained and counted. Results were expressed as 6-thioguanine resistant mutants/106clonable cells. At the concentrations tested, the results were negative in CHO-K1-BH4 cells, while 66 mutants per 106clonable cells were obtained in AS52 cells at a test chemical concentration producing a high level of toxicity. This positive response, however, was not consistently found in subsequent experiments. Toxicity was apparent in CHO cells, both with and without metabolic activation, although it was more evident in assays conducted without S9. GV-treated cells, especially AS52 cells, became tenaciously attached to the plates such that it required longer trypsinization times to dissociate them during subculture. When observed with an inverted microscope, the exposed cells appeared larger and more spindle-shaped than control cells. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell strain CHO-K1-BH4and CHO-AS52 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate does not induce gene mutation in mammalian cell lines in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Gene mutation in vitro:
Ames test:
Data available for the test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate. The studies are as mentioned below:
Ames mutagenicity test was conducted for two test chemicals to evaluate its genotoxic effects when exposed to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535 with dose concentration of 5–5000 µg/plate in plate incorporation assay. The plates were incubated for 48 h. The doses of test chemical, together with the appropriate concurrent positive controls, were tested in triplicate on each tester strain with and without S9 metabolic activation. A dose-related increase (at least 2-fold) in revertant colonies was used to define a statistically significant mutagenic response. Both the test chemicals did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimuriumTA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535 both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to be a gene mutant.
Chromosome aberration study:
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of structurally and functionally similar test chemical.The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 0.001 -6 µg/mL of the test chemical. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase The test chemical did not induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence andabsence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Mammalian cell gene mutation assay was conducted to evaluate the genotoxic potential of the test chemical. The study was performed using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell strain CHO-K1-BH4and CHO-AS52 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The test chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used at dose levels of0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 µg/ml without S9 and 0, 0.10, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.40, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50 µg/ml with S9. 1X 106cells/100 mm dish were exposed to the test chemical for 5 hrs in serum-free nutrient mixture F12. After treatment, cells were washed with Ca+ +/Mgt +-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and allowed to recover overnight in fresh F12 medium with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were then plated in F12 medium with 5% FBS and incubated for 7 days with three passages to permit expression of induced mutants. Parallel cultures of 400 cells/60-mm dish were also established for cytotoxicity determination. At the end of the phenotypic expression period, 2 X 106cells were plated at a concentration of 2 X 105celIs/100-mm dish in hypoxanthine-free F12 containing 5% dialyzed FBS and 10 µM 6-thioguanine. Cloning efficiency cultures, grown in medium without 6-thioguanine, had 200 cells/60-mm plate. All cultures were incubated for 7 days before colonies were fixed, stained and counted. Results were expressed as 6-thioguanine resistant mutants/106clonable cells. At the concentrations tested, the results were negative in CHO-K1-BH4 cells, while 66 mutants per 106clonable cells were obtained in AS52 cells at a test chemical concentration producing a high level of toxicity. This positive response, however, was not consistently found in subsequent experiments. Toxicity was apparent in CHO cells, both with and without metabolic activation, although it was more evident in assays conducted without S9. GV-treated cells, especially AS52 cells, became tenaciously attached to the plates such that it required longer trypsinization times to dissociate them during subculture. When observed with an inverted microscope, the exposed cells appeared larger and more spindle-shaped than control cells. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell strain CHO-K1-BH4and CHO-AS52 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of 3H-Indolium, 2-[2-[4-[(2-cyanoethyl)methylamino]phenyl]ethenyl]-1,3,3-trimethyl- & acetate did not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.