Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-404-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
Data for the various test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetate. The studies are as mentioned below:
AMES assay;
Salmonella/Mammalian-Microsome Mutagenicity Assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed at dose levels of 0.3-100 µg/plate using Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 with and without of metabolic activation system. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were used in the study. The test chemical did not induce mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 with and without of metabolic activation system and hence is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In another study, gene mutation toxicity study was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed by the preincubation and standard plate incorporation assay using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. The liquid preincubation assays were timed for 30 min at 37°C in a Dri-block. The test chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used upto a maximum nontoxic dose of 10 µg/plate. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were also included in the study. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In Vitro Mammalian gene mutation assay;
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of structurally and functionally similar test chemical.The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 0.001 -6 µg/mL of the test chemical. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase The test chemical did not induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence andabsence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from250-3000µg/mL. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase .The test chemical failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetateis expected to not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- experimental data of read across substances
- Justification for type of information:
- Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE derived based on the experimental data from structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial gene mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of the test material (IUPAC name): Tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]methylium acetate- Common name: Basic Violet 4- Molecular weight: 515.7375- Molecular formula: C33H45N3O2- Substance type: Organic- Physical Appearance: greenish lustrous liquid- Stability: Stable in recommended storage conditions- Storage Conditions: Ambient Temp (23 to 27 °C)
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538
- Remarks:
- 1/ 2 / 3
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 homogenate was prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rats and Syrian golden hamsters that had been injected with Aroclor 1254 at 500 mg/kg body weight
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1. 0.3- 100 µg/plate2/3. Maximum nontoxic dose tested was 10 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- 1. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: No data- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: No data2/3. - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The chemical was soluble in DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- No specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- 1
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- 2/ 3
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 1. METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)DURATION- Preincubation period: No data- Exposure duration: 48 hrs- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No dataSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No dataSPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No dataSTAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No dataNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Five doses of test chemical were tested in triplicate on each tester strain without and with metabolic activation.NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No dataDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No dataOTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data- Determination of endoreplication: No data- Other: No dataOTHER: No data2. METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubationDURATION- Preincubation period: 30 mins- Exposure duration: No data- Expression time (cells in growth medium): No data- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No dataSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: DuplicateNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No dataDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No dataOTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data- Determination of endoreplication: No data- Other: No dataOTHER: The revertant colonies were counted by using a hand-held tally.3. METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)DURATION- Preincubation period: No data- Exposure duration: No data- Expression time (cells in growth medium): No data- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No dataSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: DuplicateNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No dataDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No dataOTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data- Determination of endoreplication: No data- Other: No dataOTHER: No data
- Rationale for test conditions:
- 1. No data2. No data3. No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- 1. For a test article to be considered positive, it had to induce at least a doubling (TA98, TA100, and TA1535) in the mean number of revertants per plate of at least one tester strain. This increase in the mean revertants per plate had to be accompanied by a dose response to increasing concentrations of the test chemical. If the study showed a dose response with a less than 3-fold increase on TA1537 or TA1538, the response had to be confirmed in a repeat experiment.2/3. A compound was considered mutagenic when the number of revertants above background was at least twice the value of the historical control mean or twice the value of the current control mean, whichever was greater
- Statistics:
- 1. No data2. No data3. No data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538
- Remarks:
- 1/ 2 /3
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- 1. TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS- Effects of pH: No data- Effects of osmolality: No data - Evaporation from medium: No data- Water solubility: No data- Precipitation: No data- Other confounding effects: No dataRANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The doses that were tested in the mutagenicity assay were selected based on the levels of cytotoxicity observed in a preliminary dose range-finding study using strain TA100. Ten dose levels of the chemical, one plate per dose, were tested in both the presence and the absence of induced hamster S9. If no toxicity was observed, a total maximum dose of 10 mg of test chemical per plate was used.COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: No dataADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No data2/3. No data
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]- & acetate does not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Data for the various test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetate. The studies are as mentioned below:
Salmonella/Mammalian-Microsome Mutagenicity Assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed at dose levels of 0.3-100 µg/plate using Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 with and without of metabolic activation system. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were used in the study. The test chemical did not induce mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 with and without of metabolic activation system and hence is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In another study, gene mutation toxicity study was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed by the preincubation and standard plate incorporation assay using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. The liquid preincubation assays were timed for 30 min at 37°C in a Dri-block. The test chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used upto a maximum nontoxic dose of 10 µg/plate. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were also included in the study. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetateis expected to not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE derived based on the experimental data from structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of the test material (IUPAC name): Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]- & acetate- Common name: Basic Violet 4- Molecular weight: 515.7375- Molecular formula: C33H45N3O2- Substance type: Organic- Physical Appearance: greenish lustrous liquid- Stability: Stable in recommended storage conditions- Storage Conditions: Ambient Temp (23 to 27 °C)
- Target gene:
- No data
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/- 3.7.C / 2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The cells were grown in Fischer’s medium for leukemic cells of mice supplemented with 10% horse serum and 0.02% pluronic F-68.- Properly maintained: No data available - Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data available- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: No data available
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague- Dawley rats.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1. 0.001-6 µg/mL2,250-3000 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- 1.- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in water2. No data available
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 3-methylcholanthrene and dimethylbenz[a]- anthracene (+S9)
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethyl methylsulfonate at 4.7×10-6 M (or methyl methanesulfonate at 10-20 µg/ml mL) for the test without metabolic activation. 3-methylcholanthrene at 1.86 × 10-5 M (or dimethylbenz[a]- anthracene at 0.5-4 µg/mL) for the test with metabolic activation.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 1, METHOD OF APPLICATION: in mediumCells at start: 6000000 cellsDURATION- Preincubation period: No data available- Exposure duration: 4 h- Expression time (cells in growth medium):48 h- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data availableSELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 1×106 cells/plate for mutant selectionSPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data availableSTAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data availableNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: DuplicateNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 X 106 cells/plate for mutant selection and 200cells/plate for viable count determinations DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated culturesOTHER EXAMINATIONS:- Determination of polyploidy: No data available- Determination of endoreplication: No data available- Other: No data availableOTHER: No data available2,Details on test system and conditionsMETHOD OF APPLICATION: in mediumDURATION- Preincubation period: No data available- Exposure duration: 4 h- Expression time (cells in growth medium):48 h
- Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- 1 and 2 Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase. Doubling of the mutant frequency was previously reported as representing a positive effect. Only doses yielding total growth values of 10% were used in the analysis of induced mutant frequency. Doses yielding less than 10% total growth were used in determining dose response.
- Statistics:
- Not specified
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/- 3.7.C / 2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]- & acetate did not induce chromosome aberrations and gene mutation in the cell line in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Data for the various test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]- & acetate and as these test chemicals are read across of this target chemical .The read across substances share high similarity in functional group .Therefore, it is acceptable to derive information on mutation from the analogue substance for test substance. The studies are as mentioned below:
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of structurally and functionally similar test chemical.The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 0.001 -6 µg/mL of the test chemical. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase The test chemical did not induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence andabsence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from250-3000µg/mL. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase .The test chemical failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]- & acetate is expected to not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
AMES assay;
Data for the various test chemicals was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetate. The studies are as mentioned below:
Salmonella/Mammalian-Microsome Mutagenicity Assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed at dose levels of 0.3-100 µg/plate using Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 with and without of metabolic activation system. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were used in the study. The test chemical did not induce mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538 with and without of metabolic activation system and hence is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In another study, gene mutation toxicity study was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed by the preincubation and standard plate incorporation assay using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. The liquid preincubation assays were timed for 30 min at 37°C in a Dri-block. The test chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used upto a maximum nontoxic dose of 10 µg/plate. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were also included in the study. The test chemical did not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In Vitro Mammalian gene mutation assay;
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of structurally and functionally similar test chemical.The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 0.001 -6 µg/mL of the test chemical. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase The test chemical did not induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence andabsence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The Cells at a concentration of 6 X 105/mL (6 X106cells total) were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from250-3000µg/mL. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48h. The rate of cell growth was determined for each of the treated cultures and compared to the rate of growth of the solvent controls.Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase .The test chemical failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the data summarized, Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetateis expected to not induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Thus based on the above annotation and CLP criteria for target substance Reaction mass of Methylium, tris[4-(diethylamino)phenyl]-& acetatedoes not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
