Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1963
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1963
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CF-1
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No further data on test animals reported.
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
No further data on oral exposure reported.
Doses:
Not reported.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
40 male mice (total).
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
No further data on oral exposure reported.
Statistics:
LD50 and standard errors calculated using the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon (1949).
Preliminary study:
Not specified
Key result
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
4 500 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 4 054 - < 4 995
Mortality:
Some deaths occurred at 24 hours post-exposure. The peak of mortality was reported to occur at 48 h post-exposure. No further details reported.
Clinical signs:
Ataxia, writhing, laboured respiration, walking on toes with back arched, and sedation.
Body weight:
No data
Gross pathology:
No data
Other findings:
No data
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The LD50 of praseodymium trichloride to male mice was found to be 4500 mg/kg bw. The test substance is therefore considered not to be classified according to the CLP Regulation.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1963
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The method of Draize et al. (1944) was used to study ocular irritation in rabbits.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
No further data on test animals reported.
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each rabbit
- Concentration (if solution): 1:1 aqueous solution
Duration of treatment / exposure:
not reported
Observation period (in vivo):
4 weeks total, post-application
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3, sex not specified
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE: no data

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
20
Max. score:
20
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: > 1 week
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
0
Max. score:
80
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
0
Max. score:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No effects were observed on cornea or iris, however, increased blinking rate and a maximum irritation index of 20 on the conjunctiva were observed within 1 hour after application. The test item produced conjunctival ulcers which persisted for 1 week, after which complete healing occurred. Observations over the next 3 weeks did not disclose any residual damage to the eye structures.
Interpretation of results:
Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The test item was found to produce conjunctival ulcers in rabbits, which persisted for one week but after that healed completely. No effect was observed on cornea or iris. Based on the results of this study, the test item praseodymium trichloride would have to be classified as Eye irritant Cat. 2, according to the CLP Regulation.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1963
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
documentation insufficient for assessment
Remarks:
Well performed study, however, the publication does not provide sufficient information to evaluate the results of the study taking into account current methodological requirements.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: CRW
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No further details on test animals reported.
Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
CONCENTRATIONS IN DIET: 0.01%, 0.1% and 1% in diet (i.e. 0.1, 1 and 10 g/kg food, respectively)
No further details on exposure reported.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
No additional data.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
90 days
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Dose / conc.:
10 000 mg/kg diet
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg diet
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg diet
Dose / conc.:
0 mg/kg diet
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6 males and 6 females per dose
Control animals:
yes, plain diet
Details on study design:
No additional information.
Positive control:
Not specified.
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Not specified

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Not specified

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Every 2 weeks

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Every 2 weeks
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Not specified
- Animals fasted: Not specified
- How many animals: Not specified
- Parameters examined: Total erythrocytes, total leucocytes, differential cell count, platelets, hemoglobin, hematocrit

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No

IMMUNOLOGY: No
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Not specified

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes, upon completion of the study
- Tissues examined: heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, pancreas, adrenal, and small intestine
Other examinations:
No data
Statistics:
Where appropriate, the results were analysed statistically by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon (1949).
Clinical signs:
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not examined
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The slight changes seen in the hemogram were probably related to the normal growth pattern of the animals and were within the range given by Gardner (1947). A normal pattern was also obtained with the differential cell counts.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
At necropsy, all animals appeared normal.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Histopathologic examination of the tissues showed no differences between medicated and control groups.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Other effects:
not examined
Details on results:
No further details reported.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 10 000 mg/kg diet
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Critical effects observed:
no
Conclusions:
The test item did not appear to have adverse effects on rats during and following 12 weeks of daily administration at dose levels of 0, 0.01%, 0.1% and 1% in diet, under the conditions of the test. No NOAEL could be determined due to absence of adverse effects. Therefore, an unbound NOAEL of >= 10000 mg/kg diet could be derived from the results of this study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1964

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The method of Draize et al. (1944) was used to study skin irritation in rabbits.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Praseodymium trichloride
EC Number:
233-794-4
EC Name:
Praseodymium trichloride
Cas Number:
10361-79-2
Molecular formula:
PrCl3
IUPAC Name:
praseodymium trichloride
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
No further details available

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No further data on test animals reported.

Test system

Type of coverage:
not specified
Preparation of test site:
other: intact and abraded skin
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Not entirely clear.
Observation period:
7 days (up to 35 days for animals exposed to the test chemical on abraded skin)
Number of animals:
6, sex not specified
Details on study design:
TEST SITE: no data reported

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE: no data reported

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS: not reported, but observations are reported after 24 h, 7 days, and 35 days (the latter only for abraded skin)

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
8
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
intact skin
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
8
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 35 days
Remarks on result:
probability of severe irritation
Remarks:
abraded skin
Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Direct application of the test item to intact rabbit skin produced no irritation within 24 hours, and no delayed reaction after 7 days.
- On abraded skin, there was a severe reaction after 24 hours with a maximum irritation index of 8. No change in irritation index was observed over the following 14 days, but complete healing with scars of 25-30 mm in diameter occurred at 35 days.
- It was mentioned that the liberation of nascent hydrochloric acid from the test item by tissue fluids may explain the difference in response between intact and abraded skin.
Other effects:
No additional information.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was found to be irritating to abraded skin, but non-irritating to intact skin. Therefore, and considering the requirements of current test guidelines, the test substance is considered to be not classified according to the CLP Regulation.