Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-222-1 | CAS number: 90583-23-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
No data on repeated dose toxicity are available for the target substance sulfuric acid, mono-C12-14 (even numbered)-alkyl esters, magnesium salts (CAS 90583-23-6). Therefore, read-across from structural analogue substances has been applied.
Oral and dermal repeated dose toxicity: NOAEL = 488 mg/kg bw/day
Read-across of key information from source substance sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0) supported by additional studies performed with various structural analogue substances.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Remarks:
- Summary of available data used for the endpoint assessment of the target substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the Category Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID6 Section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 0.56 other: % in the diet
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 488 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks on result:
- other: Source, key, 68890-70-0, 1976a
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Since the liver showed only adaptive responses, the NOAEL for male and female animals was set at 488 mg/kg bw/day (corresponding to 0.56% in diet). The adaptive changes included elevated relative liver weight due to a lower body weight and reduced food consumption, hepatic periportal hypertrophy as well as increased serum alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity. An increased serum AP activity is considered to indicate a physiological adaptation resulting from changes in hepatic metabolism required for the breakdown and detoxification of the test material. Since AP is mainly localised in the hepatic parenchyma, enlargement of the hepatic parenchymal cells accompanied by an increased organ weight are an obvious consequence.
- Executive summary:
The oral repeated dose toxicity of the target substance is estimated based on an adequate and reliable subchronic oral toxicity study of a structural analogue source substance. Oral exposure for 13 weeks with the test substance resulted only in an adaptive response of the liver as the main target organ. The adaptive changes included elevated relative liver weights, hepatic periportal hypertrophy as well as increased serum alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity. The NOAEL for male and female rats was established at 488 mg/kg bw/day. The results are further supported by additional (supporting) studies on various structural analogue substances. As explained in the category justification, the differences in molecular structure between the target and the source substances are unlikely to lead to differences in oral repeated dose toxicity.
Reference
The key result is further supported by additional (supporting) studies:
Supporting, 68890-70-0, 1995a&b: NOEL (2 year, m/f) = 113 mg/kg bw/day
Supporting, 151-21-3, 1967: NOAEL (m/f) >= 430 mg/kg bw/day
Supporting, 151-21-3, 1976b: NOAEL (m/f) = 460 mg/kg bw/day
Supporting, 68585-47-7, 1976: NOAEL (m) = 201.28 mg/kg bw/day; NOAEL (f) = 254.56 mg/kg bw/day (highest doses tested)
Supporting, 86014-79-1, 1977a: NOAEL (m/f) = 512 mg/kg bw/day
Supporting, 68955-20-4, 1977b: NOAEL (m/f) = 482 mg/kg bw/day
Supporting, 68955-20-4, 1987c: NOAEL (m/f) = 300 mg/kg bw/day
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 488 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises adequate and reliable (Klimisch score 1 and 2) studies from various source substances with similar structures and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common physico-chemical, ecotoxicological and toxicological properties. The selected studies are thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.6, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the Category Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID6 Section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 other: %
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Corresponding to 400 mg/kg bw.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Source, key, 68890-70-0, 1977c
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 12.5 other: %
- System:
- integumentary
- Organ:
- skin
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Subchronic exposure to the test substance resulted in extensive necrosis and ulceration of the skin, changes in haematology and organ weights. The NOAEL was established at 400 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
The dermal repeated dose toxicity of the target substance is estimated based on an adequate and reliable subchronic dermal toxicity study of a structural analogue source substance. Dermal exposure for 13 weeks with the test substance resulted in extensive necrosis and ulceration of the skin, changes in haematology and organ weights. The NOAEL was established at 400 mg/kg bw/day. As explained in the category justification, the differences in molecular structure between the target and the source substances are unlikely to lead to differences in dermal repeated dose toxicity.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- mouse
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable (Klimisch score 1) study from a source substances with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common physico-chemical, ecotoxicological and toxicological properties. The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.6, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to the Category Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID6 Section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 other: %
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Corresponding to 400 mg/kg bw.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Source, key, 68890-70-0, 1977c
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 12.5 other: %
- System:
- integumentary
- Organ:
- skin
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Subchronic exposure to the test substance resulted in extensive necrosis and ulceration of the skin, changes in haematology and organ weights. The NOAEL was established at 400 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
The dermal repeated dose toxicity of the target substance is estimated based on an adequate and reliable subchronic dermal toxicity study of a structural analogue source substance. Dermal exposure for 13 weeks with the test substance resulted in extensive necrosis and ulceration of the skin, changes in haematology and organ weights. The NOAEL was established at 400 mg/kg bw/day. As explained in the category justification, the differences in molecular structure between the target and the source substances are unlikely to lead to differences in dermal repeated dose toxicity.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- mouse
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable (Klimisch score 1) study from a source substances with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common physico-chemical, ecotoxicological and toxicological properties. The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.6, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Additional information
There are no data on oral and dermal repeated dose toxicity available for the target substance sulfuric acid, mono-C12-14 (even numbered)-alkyl esters, magnesium salts (CAS 90583-23-6). Therefore, these endpoints are covered by read-across from structurally related alkyl sulfates (AS). The possibility of a read-across from other alkyl sulfates in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, Annex XI 1.5 “Grouping of substances and read-across approach” was assessed. In Annex XI 1.5 it is given that a read-across approach is possible for substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity. The AS reported within the AS category show structural similarity. The most important common structural feature of the category members is the presence of a predominantly linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain with a polar sulfate group, neutralised with a counter ion. This structural feature confers the surfactant properties of the alkyl sulfates. The surfactant property of the members of the AS category in turn represents the predominant attribute in mediating effects on mammalian health. Therefore, the members of the AS category have similar physicochemical, environmental and toxicological properties, validating the read-across approach within the category. The approach of grouping different AS for the evaluation of their effects on human health and the environment was also made by the OECD in the SIDS initial assessment profile [1] and by a voluntary industry programme carrying out Human and Environmental Risk Assessments (HERA [2]), further supporting the read-across approach between structurally related AS.
Reliable repeated dose toxicity studies have been conducted with sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0), sodium dodecyl sulfate (CAS 151-21-3), sulfuric acid, mono-C10-16-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68585-47-7), sulfuric acid, mono-C13-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 86014-79-1), and sulfuric acid, mono-C16-18 (even-numbered)-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68955-20-4). Hence, alkyl sulfates with chain lengths between C10 and C18 have been tested.
Oral feeding repeated dose toxicity
Sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0) was investigated in a 13 week and in two 2 year studies with rats, all using the dietary route of exposure. When tested for 13 weeks at dietary concentrations of 0, 0, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, 0.56, 1.13 or 2.25% in groups of ten rats/sex/dose in the key study that meets current standards (except for neurotoxicity and immunotoxicity testing, Unilever 1976a), the NOEL was set at 0.14% (122 mg/kg bw/day). Since the liver as the target organ showed only adaptive responses, the NOAEL was set at 0.56% (488 mg/kg bw/day). The adaptive changes included elevated relative liver weight due to a lower body weight and reduced food consumption, hepatic periportal hypertrophy as well as increased serum alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity. An increased serum AP activity is considered to represent a physiological adaptation resulting from changes in hepatic metabolism required for the breakdown and detoxification of the test material. Since AP is mainly localized in the hepatic parenchyma, enlargement of the hepatic parenchymal cells accompanied by an increased organ weight are an obvious consequence.
In the chronic dietary repeated dose toxicity studies with sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0) which support the findings of the key study, the NOELs were set at 113 mg/kg bw/day (LOAELs = 1125 mg/kg bw/day; Unilever, 1995a,b). Animals in the high dose groups in both studies exhibited reduced food and water consumption and slower growth rates. Other pathological findings were increased absolute liver weights and liver to body weight ratios, hypertrophy of the hepatic parenchyma, increased relative testicular weights, reduced incidence and severity of chronic nephropathy and nephrocalcinosis and reduced arterial medial hypertrophy.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (CAS 151-21-3) was tested as well in a 90 day feeding study on rats (Walker et al., 1967). 12 male and 12 female rats/group were fed dietary levels of 40, 200, 1000 or 5000 ppm (corresponding to 3, 17, 86 or 430 mg/kg bw/day). The control group (18 males, 18 females) received the diet alone. Daily observations were made on health. Body weight and food intake were recorded weekly. Urine samples were obtained from the 5000 ppm and control groups during Week 12. The urine was examined for colour, pH, protein, reducing substances, bile salts and microscopic constituents. Terminal blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture and erythrocyte and leukocyte counts and determinations of haematocrit and haemoglobin were made. Total plasma protein and urea were determined. Gross pathological and histological examinations of a wide range of organs were made. The only effects observed occurred at 5000 ppm and comprised increases in liver weights in female animals. Regarding this as an adaptive effect, the NOAEL can be set at the highest dose level of 5000 ppm (430 mg/kg bw/day).
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (CAS 151-21-3) was also tested in a 13 week feeding study on rats (Unilever, 1976b). Ten rats/sex/dose in the test groups and 20 rats/sex in the control group were administered dietary levels of 0, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, 0.56, 1.13 and 2.25% (corresponding to 0, 58, 116, 230, 460, 920 and 1840 mg/kg bw/day). The control group received the diet alone. The NOAEL was set at 460 mg/kg bw/day since only adaptive changes were observed at this dose level.
Another subchronic feeding study was conducted with sulfuric acid, mono-C10-16-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68585-47-7; P&G, 1976). Administration of 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1% test substance in diet (corresponding to 0, 58, 118 and 228 mg/kg bw/day for males and females based on a.i.) to 20 Sprague-Dawley rats/sex/dose revealed no treatment-related effects either in-life or at necropsy. In addition, histopathological examinations did not show any changes considered to be related to compound administration. Hence, the NOAEL calculated by the mean food consumption was set at 254 mg/kg bw/day based on a.i. for females and 201 mg/kg bw/d based on a.i. for males.
In another subchronic study with sulfuric acid, mono-C13-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 86014-79-1; Unilever, 1977a), ten animals/sex/group were fed diets containing 0, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, 0.56, 1.13 or 2.25% (corresponding to 0, 64, 134, 253, 512, 1007, or 2096 mg/kg bw/day), the NOAEL was established at 512 mg/kg bw/day since only adaptive changes (elevated liver weights and hypertrophy of the liver) were observed. At the LOAEL (1007 mg/kg bw/day) and higher dosages effects observed included enlargement of the kidneys without histological identifiable structural change, increased patency of intestinal lymphatics, decreased serum cholesterol concentration and elevated serum activity of the enzymes cholinesterase and glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase.
Sulfuric acid, mono-C16-18 (even-numbered)-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68955-20-4; subchronic, dietary study, Unilever, 1977b) shows an identical profile with a similar NOAEL (482 mg/kg bw/day) and LOAEL (970 mg/kg bw/day).
Oral gavage repeated dose toxicity
In a 90 day gavage study, sulfuric acid, mono-C16-18 (even-numbered)-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68955-20-4) was administered as 55% aqueous solution to groups of 10 rats/sex/dose at dose levels of 100, 300 and 900 mg/kg bw/day, corresponding to ca. 55, 165 and 495 mg a.i./kg bw/day (BASF, 1987c). The NOEL was established at 55 mg a.i./kg bw/day. At the next higher dose level (NOAEL, 165 mg a.i./kg bw/day) food consumption and body weight gain were reduced, and relative liver weight was increased. Other changes were non-specific and probably due to the irritant effect of the test substance to the stomach mucosa. At 495 mg/kg bw/day, there were clear signs of gastritis; absolute and relative liver weights were increased. No signs of toxicity were found in the kidney.
Dermal repeated dose toxicity
A repeated dose toxicity study with dermal application is also available. Dose levels employed in the 90 day study were 0, 5, 10, 12.5 and 15% sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0) corresponding to 0, 200, 400, 500 and 600 mg/kg bw/day based on an average weight of 20 g bw/mouse and a 5 days/week treatment (Unilever, 1977c). Ten C57BL mice per sex and group were treated with a dose volume of 0.2 mL with the control group receiving sterile water. An unknown area of all animals was treated with the appropriate dose two times per week. All animals were observed daily for signs of general health, mortality and gross skin irritation effects. Gross signs of toxicity and body weights were recorded on a weekly basis throughout the study. Effects at the site of application were consistent with the irritant properties of the test material. Dose-related ulceration of the epidermis with inflammatory exudate was observed at the 12.5% and 15% concentrations. Dose-dependent increases in edema, vascular dilatation, epidermal acanthosis, hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis were prominent at the 10% treatment level and above. Haemoglobin levels were reduced and white blood cell counts increased in males of the high dose group. No clinical chemistry measurements were performed. Other noteworthy systemic effects included increases in liver-to-body weight ratios in both sexes at the 15% concentration, and in females at the 12.5% concentration. Absolute kidney weights increased in males and kidney weight-to-body weight ratios increased in females at the 15% treatment level. These target organs are consistent with those observed in the oral studies. Effects at these more distant organs suggest that a higher level of percutaneous absorption of the test material may have occurred at high doses with the longer duration of exposure in this study. The systemic NOAEL was set at 400 mg/kg bw/day. However, the dietary NOAEL of 488 mg/kg bw/day will be used for risk assessment. For details refer to the following discussion.
Conclusion
In summary, gastrointestinal irritation, particularly of the forestomach, was the primary effect after application via gavage but not after application via the diet. This is consistent with the primary irritant properties of the alkyl sulfates (AS) used as structural analogues and the bolus effect after application by gavage. Notably, gavage studies that included recovery groups indicated that systemic effects other than forestomach irritation were fully reversible. Moreover, administration via gavage (see developmental toxicity studies as well) does not allow differentiating between systemic effects as a consequence of the local irritation or due to specific substance properties (e.g. leucocytosis). The study investigating the dermal route resulted in significant local irritation. It provided some evidence of systemic toxicity. However, there is insufficient information to determine if these effects represented a direct toxic effect from systemic exposure to AS or if the response was associated with the significant dermal inflammation. Thus, the NOAEL used for the risk assessment should be based on a dietary study to assess potential systemic toxicity resulting from repeated exposures to AS. After administration in the diet, the liver was the only target organ identified. Adaptive effects on this organ included an increase in liver weight, enlargement of liver cells and elevated levels of liver enzymes. Liver effects were more apparent in dietary studies, partly because these allowed administration of higher doses of the test material with less GI tract injury.
The summary of all dietary NOAELs and LOAELs in Table 1 shows that the spacing of the concentrations in the chronic toxicity studies was very high. On the other hand, the NOAELs of the subchronic studies are all in the same range and about 4.5 times higher.
Table 1: NOAELs and LOAELs (for a.i.) for repeated dietary dose toxicity studies of AS in rats
Substance |
Duration (weeks) |
NOAEL (mg/kg bw/day) |
LOAEL (mg/kg bw/day) |
Reference |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (CAS 151-21-3) |
13 |
430 |
> 430 |
Walker (1967) |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (CAS 151-21-3) |
13 |
460 |
920 |
Unilever (1976b) |
Sulfuric acid, mono-C10-16-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68585-47-7) |
13 |
201/254 |
> 201/>254 |
P&G (1976) |
Sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0) |
13 |
488 |
1016 |
Unilever (1976a) |
Sulfuric acid, mono-C13-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 86014-79-1) |
13 |
512 |
1007 |
Unilever (1977a) |
Sulfuric acid, mono-C16-18 (even-numbered)-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68955-20-4) |
13 |
482 |
970 |
Unilever (1977b) |
Sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0) |
104 |
113 |
1125 |
Unilever (1995a,b) |
The NOAELs and LOAELs established in the different studies draw a coherent picture. The NOAEL of the chronic toxicity study (113 mg/kg bw/day) as well as the NOAEL of 254 mg/kg bw/day in the study with sulfuric acid, mono-C10-16-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68585-47-7; P&G, 1976) represent unreasonably low doses for risk assessment. The relatively low values are due to the chosen dose level and the dose spacing, respectively. No effects were observed at both dose levels. Since the subchronic and chronic LOAELs are in the same range and the subchronic NOAELs do not conflict with the chronic LOAEL, one of the subchronic NOAELs can be chosen as basis for risk assessment. Based on the effects and argumentations discussed above, the dietary NOAEL of 488 mg/kg bw/day for sulfuric acid, mono-C12-15-alkyl esters, sodium salts (CAS 68890-70-0; Unilever, 1976a) representing an average of all NOAEL was chosen for the risk assessment of oral and dermal exposure for the target substance sulfuric acid, mono-C12-14 (even numbered)-alkyl esters, magnesium salts (CAS 90583-23-6).
[1] SIDS initial assessment profile, (2007); http://www.aciscience.org/docs/Alkyl_Sulfates_Final_SIAP.pdf
[2] (HERA Draft report, 2002);
http://www.heraproject.com/files/3-HH-04-%20HERA%20AS%20HH%20web%20wd.pdf
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on repeated dose toxicity following oral and dermal exposure obtainded with structurally analogue substances do not meet the criteria for classification according to the CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and are, therefore, conclusive but not sufficient for classification. Based on read-across the target substance sulfuric acid, mono-C12-14 (even numbered)-alkyl esters, magnesium salts (CAS 90583-23-6) is also not classified for oral and dermal repeated dose toxicity. No data regarding repeated dose toxicity after inhalation are available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.