Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-349-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-Propanaminium,3-amino-N-(carboxymethyl)-N,N-dimethyl-,N-C18(unsaturated) acyl derivs., hydroxides, inner salts
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-Propanaminium,3-amino-N-(carboxymethyl)-N,N-dimethyl-,N-C18(unsaturated) acyl derivs., hydroxides, inner salts
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The test material corresponded to the approximately 45% of the registration substance. The given dose refers to the amount of the registration substance.
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:Vivo Bio Tech Ltd., Sy. #349/A, Pregnapur-502311, Gajwel Mandal, Medak District, Telangana
- Age at study initiation: 7 weeks.
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 190.70 to 229.43g and Females: 143.89 to 174.62g
- Housing: Rats were housed in a group of two animals of same sex per cage in sterilized suspended polysulfone cages with solid floor (size: L 425 x B 266 x H 185 mm) with stainless steel top grill having facilities for providing pelletted food and drinking water in polycarbonate bottle with stainless steel sipper tubes. Polycarbonate rat huts was provided to the animals as environmental enrichment objects and changed along with cage at least once a week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Teklad Certified (2014C) Global 14 % Protein Rodent Maintenance Diet - Pellet (Certified) manufactured by Harlan Laboratories (Envigo), P.O. Box 44220, Madison, Wi 53744-4220 was provided ad libitum to the animals.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Deep bore-well water passed through activated charcoal filter and exposed to UV rays in ‘Aquaguard’ on-line water filter-cum-purifier manufactured by Eureka Forbes Ltd., Mumbai 400 001, India was provided ad libitum to rats in polycarbonate bottles with stainless steel sipper tubes.
- Acclimation period: five days before start of the treatment.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): The temperature maintained during the experiment was between 20 and 24°C.
- Humidity (%): The relative humidity was between 65 to 67 %.
- Air changes (per hr): Adequate fresh air supply of 12 - 15 air changes/hour was maintained in the experimental room.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): The photoperiod was 12 hours light and 12 hours dark cycle.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 17 September 2016 To: 03 November 2016
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Remarks:
- 0.5% Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium salt (medium viscosity) in Milli-Q® Water was used to prepare the dose formulations as the same vehicle was used in the 14 day repeated dose toxicity study with the same test item (Study No.N2857).
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE PREPARATION
10.0 g of Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose was added to about 1800 mL of Milli-Q® water in a 2000 mL pre-marked beaker* and stirred on a magnetic stirrer. The final volume was made up to the mark with Milli-Q® water. After obtaining uniform suspension, the suspension was stored at room temperature in the experimental room.
Details of components used for vehicle preparation are as follows:
Name of vehicle: Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium salt (medium viscosity)
Manufactured by: Sigma
Date of receipt: 17.12.2014
Lot No.: SLBF3845V
Date of expiry: Dec 2019
This vehicle was used for the preparation of the dose formulations and administration to the rats in vehicle control group.
*Pre-marking of beaker: The magnetic stir bar was placed in a clean beaker, measured the purified water (Milli-Q®) in a graduated cylinder to the final volume of 2000 mL. The water was transferred into the beaker containing magnetic bar and the upper meniscus of the water was marked. Once marking was done, water was discarded and the beaker and stir bar was allowed to dry.
The weights and volumes of the above reagents were varied proportionately depending on the volume of the vehicle prepared during the course of the study.
The weights and volumes of the above reagents were varied proportionately depending on the volume of the vehicle prepared during the course of the study. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- For homogeneity and active ingredient (a.i.) concentration analysis, prepared formulation samples were sampled in duplicate sets on Day 1 and during week 4 of the treatment and analysed in-house. Samples were drawn from top, middle and bottom layers of each preparation for treatment groups in duplicate sets and from middle layers of preparation for control group (three samples corresponding to each treatment group).
The analysis was done as per the method validated under Advinus Study No.: G11354. One set of samples were analysed for concentration (a.i) analysis. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 Males and 5 Females per group
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- The dose levels of 100 (G2), 300 (G3) and 600 (G4/G4R) mg/kg/day were selected for this study in consultation with the Sponsor and were based on the results of 14-Day Repeated Dose Oral Toxicity Study in Wistar Rats (Study No.N2857) in which the animals treated at 100 mg/kg/day exhibited a significant change in body weight development.
In addition to the test doses, vehicle control and vehicle control recovery groups were included. Animals in the vehicle control and vehicle control recovery groups were handled in a manner similar to the treatment groups except for test item administration.
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Morning
- Cage side observations checked in table were included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights (g) were recorded prior to test item administration on Day 1 and weekly thereafter (± 1 day) for all groups of rats during treatment and recovery period. Fasting body weight was recorded prior to sacrifice for all animals.
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- The food consumption was measured at weekly intervals (± 1 day) during treatment and recovery period. The cage wise average food consumption (g/rat/day) was calculated and presented in the report.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at the end of treatment period for main groups and at the end of recovery period for recovery groups.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (isoflurane)
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 60 animals
- Following parameters checked:
Red Blood Corpuscles
Haemoglobin
Haematocrit
Mean Corpuscular Volume
Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin
Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration
Reticulocytes count
White Blood Corpuscles
Differential leukocyte count
Platelets
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at the end of treatment period for main groups and at the end of recovery period for recovery groups.
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 60 animals
- Following parameters checked:
Alanine Aminotransferase
Albumin
Albumin/Globulin ratio [calculated values]
Alkaline phosphatase
Aspartate Amino Transferase
Blood Urea Nitrogen
Bile acids
Calcium
Chloride
Creatinine
Creatine Kinase
Gamma Glutamyl Transpeptidase
Globulin [calculated values]
Glucose
Inorganic phosphorous
Potassium
Sodium
Total Bilirubin
Total Cholesterol
Total protein
Triglycerides
URINALYSIS
- Time schedule for collection of urine: at the end of treatment period for main groups and at the end of recovery period for recovery groups.
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 60 animals
- Following parameters checked:
Specific gravity
Nitrite
pH
Proteins
Glucose
Ketone bodies
Urobilinogen
Bilirubin
Appearance (colour and clarity)
Volume (approximate) - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table)
- Other examinations:
- FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATION BATTERY TESTS
The following neurological examination was performed during 4th week of treatment period for main groups and towards the end of recovery period for recovery period.
HOME CAGE OBSERVATIONS
Each rat was observed in the home cage for posture and for presence or absence of abnormal vocalizations, tremors and convulsions.
OBSERVATIONS DURING REMOVAL OF ANIMAL FROM HOME CAGE AND HANDLING
The objective of this phase of neurological examination was to observe the subject’s response to handling and to conduct other procedures of the FOB that can best be performed when the rat is being held. Each rat was observed for the following examinations:
- ease of removal from home cage
-handling reactivity
-palpebral closure
-eye examination
-piloerection
-lacrimation
-salivation
-skin/fur examination
-perineum wetness
-respiration
-muscle tone and
-extensor thrust response
The observations were recorded using scores/ranks.
OPEN FIELD OBSERVATION
Rat was placed (one at a time) in an open arena, on a flat surface with a clean absorbent paper and observed for at least 2 minutes. Absorbent paper was replaced for each rat. During this observation period, rat was evaluated as it moves about freely/unperturbed and the following observations were made and observations were recorded using score/ranks:
-gait
-posture
-tremors
-mobility score
-arousal level
-clonic or tonic movements
-stereotypic behaviour
-bizarre behaviour
-urination
-defecation
-rearing
-abnormal vocalizations
FUNCTIONAL TESTS
Functional testing includes motor activity, sensory evaluation, landing hindlimbs footsplay and measurement of grip performance.
- Motor Activity
The motor activity of rats was measured using an automated animal activity measuring system (Make: Columbus Instruments) equipped with a computer analyzer. Each rat was individually placed in the activity cages of the instrument. The rats were monitored for 30 minutes. During this motor activity measurement session, parameters viz., the stereotypic time (small movements) in seconds, the ambulatory time (large ambulatory movement) in seconds, horizontal counts, ambulatory counts were monitored. The Opto-Varimex 4 motor activity measurement system provided the data at 1 minute interval and the data was analyzed in blocks of 10 minutes interval and the same was reported.
- Sensory Reactivity Measurements
After the 2 minutes (approximately) observation period, while the rat was in the open field arena, the following tests were conducted. The rat was allowed to move freely in the open field box for these tests but positioned in the box by the observer in order to administer stimulus. During sensory reactivity measurements, rats were observed for following and the observations were recorded using scores/ranks.
-approach response
-touch response
-click response
-tail-pinch response
-pupil response
-aerial righting reflex
Landing Hindlimbs Footsplay:
The landing hind limbs foot splay was performed by dropping the rat on to a horizontal surface of the table top from a short height and measuring the distance between the hind feet upon landing. The hind feet of the rat was gently pressed to an ink pad just prior to testing. The rat was suspended in a prone position and then dropped from a height of approximately 30 cm on to a SOP format, which contains the details such as Study no., Animal no, Group and Sex. A clean recording paper sheet was used for each rat. A total of 3 readings were recorded for each rat and average of 3 footsplay values are presented in the report along with the individual footsplay values.
Grip Performance:
Hindlimbs and forelimbs grip performance was tested using computerized dual grip strength meter (Model: Columbus Instruments). Three trials were conducted for each rat i.e., three trials each for forelimb and hind limbs. Average of three trials for both forelimb and hindlimbs are calculated and presented in the report along with the individual grip strength values.
Physiological Observations :
Body temperature (rectal temperature) was measured in degree Celsius (°C) using digital thermometer.
At the end of the functional test, body weight of each rat was measured. - Statistics:
- Data captured using Provantis™ for the parameters body weight, organ weights; laboratory investigations - haematology (Coagulation tests PT and APTT which was entered retrospectively in ProvantisTM) and clinical chemistry were analyzed using built-in statistical tests.
The integrated decision tree of ProvantisTM:
(i)Test variance homogeneity by Levene’s method was tested. When variances are heterogeneous, suitable transformation was performed automatically by the software.
(ii) Further one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. When ANOVA was significant, Dunnett’s control versus treatment group mean comparisons was performed
Derived data like net body weight change, food consumption and organ weight ratios were analyzed using above mentioned methods.
The statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using the validated package in Excel and also using licensed copies of SYSTAT Statistical package ver.12.0. All quantitative variables like neurological observations (neuromuscular observation/body temperature/body weights) was tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homogeneity of variances (Levene’s test) within the group before performing a one-factor ANOVA modeling by treatment groups. Non-optimal (non-normal or heteroschedastic) data was transformed, before ANOVA is performed. Comparison of means between treatment groups and control group was done using Dunnett’s test when the overall treatment, ‘F’ test is found to be significant.
The data pertaining to males and female rats was evaluated separately.
All analyses and comparisons were evaluated at the 5% (P<0.05) level. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05), indicated by the aforementioned tests were designated by the following symbols throughout the report:
+/-: Significantly higher/lower than the respective control group
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- ↑ ALT activity in 300mg/kg/day dose females and ALT, AST and creatine kinase activity in 600mg/kg/day dose in males and females were observed. ↑ ALT activity(1.71 folds) observed in 300mg/kg/day dose females was not associated with any microscopic changes
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Grossly, focal to multifocal thickening of non glandular mucosa of stomach in single male at mid dose, in four males and all females at 600 mg/kg/day dose and reversible at the end of 14 day recovery period.
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- epithelial hyperplasia, erosion and oedema microscopically in a single male at 300 mg/kg/day dose and in four males and all females at 600 mg/kg/day dose and reversible at the end of 14 day recovery period
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Details on results:
- To summarise, daily oral (gavage) administration of test item “C18unsat-AAPB” to Wistar rats at the dose levels of 100, 300 and 600 mg/kg/day did not cause any clinical signs or mortalities. There were no test item-related changes in body weights, net body weight gains, food consumption and neurological findings. There were no test item-related changes observed in haematological, coagulation and urine parameters. Clinical chemistry analysis revealed increased ALT activity in 300 mg/kg/day dose females and ALT, AST and creatine kinase activity in males and females at 600 mg/kg/day dose group. Increased ALT activity (1.71 folds) in 300 mg/kg/day dose females was not associated with any microscopic changes in liver and hence, considered as non adverse change. Grossly, focal to multifocal thickening of non glandular mucosa of stomach was observed associated with microscopic changes of epithelial hyperplasia, erosion and oedema in a single male at 300 mg/kg/day and 600 mg/kg/day dose males (4/5) and females (5/5). The changes were considered as test item-related reversible changes. Single incidence of focal thickening of non glandular mucosa of stomach in 300 mg/kg/day dose male was considered as non-adverse as it was associated with only minimal to moderate epithelial hyperplasia, erosion and oedema. The changes observed in stomach were considered as local effects due to irritant nature of test item.
Hence, the evaluated No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) is considered to be 300 mg/kg/day following oral gavage administration for 28 consecutive days to wistar rats under the test conditions and doses employed due to the changes in clinical chemistry and the stomach leisions at 600 mg/kg/day
Effect levels
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- haematology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
Target system / organ toxicity
open allclose all
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- System:
- gastrointestinal tract
- Organ:
- stomach
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of Body Weights of Males
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight of males [g]; n = 5 |
||||||
1d |
8d |
15d |
22d |
28d |
35d |
42d |
||
For animals sacrificed after treatment |
||||||||
0 |
Mean |
210.086 |
244.690 |
278.944 |
304.458 |
325.160 |
|
|
S.D. |
9.040 |
6.990 |
7.331 |
9.180 |
8.688 |
|
|
|
100 |
Mean |
206.544 |
238.548 |
269.034 |
294.628 |
311.564 |
|
|
S.D. |
16.276 |
12.731 |
13.420 |
14.384 |
14.208 |
|
|
|
300 |
Mean |
209.104 |
246.334 |
277.158 |
304.352 |
324.370 |
|
|
S.D. |
15.113 |
24.273 |
30.076 |
34.161 |
37.899 |
|
|
|
1000 |
Mean |
207.660 |
233.268 |
261.274 |
287.538 |
300.544 |
|
|
S.D. |
9.802 |
6.067 |
10.664 |
18.403 |
20.509 |
|
|
|
For animals sacrificed after treatment and recovery |
||||||||
0 |
Mean |
203.746 |
238.310 |
262.396 |
285.550 |
299.930 |
319.584 |
333.862 |
S.D. |
10.285 |
11.942 |
16.784 |
20.510 |
23.024 |
22.900 |
20.744 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
207.292 |
229.712 |
254.906 |
276.442 |
286.496 |
311.366 |
331.774 |
S.D. |
12.468 |
17.238 |
25.379 |
28.855 |
30.442 |
32.510 |
33.752 |
Table 2: Summary of Body Weights of Females
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Body weight of females [g]; n = 5 |
||||||
1d |
8d |
15d |
22d |
28d |
35d |
42d |
||
For animals sacrificed after treatment |
||||||||
0 |
Mean |
156.008 |
166.978 |
180.464 |
191.322 |
198.392 |
|
|
S.D. |
10.830 |
12.744 |
14.790 |
16.694 |
18.497 |
|
|
|
100 |
Mean |
156.496 |
167.038 |
179.084 |
188.520 |
195.388 |
|
|
S.D. |
9.629 |
7.727 |
8.159 |
8.562 |
9.869 |
|
|
|
300 |
Mean |
150.210 |
166.214 |
181.098 |
190.954 |
195.932 |
|
|
S.D. |
6.191 |
8.571 |
8.039 |
13.386 |
10.753 |
|
|
|
1000 |
Mean |
154.164 |
168.024 |
184.602 |
193.736 |
198.534 |
|
|
S.D. |
8.164 |
9.515 |
6.922 |
6.160 |
6.642 |
|
|
|
For animals sacrificed after treatment and recovery |
||||||||
0 |
Mean |
155.786 |
171.910 |
183.540 |
193.056 |
200.874 |
208.528 |
214.148 |
|
S.D. |
12.153 |
10.266 |
11.923 |
13.253 |
9.332 |
12.148 |
14.511 |
1000 |
Mean |
154.428 |
166.490 |
179.690 |
191.356 |
198.790 |
202.364 |
208.266 |
|
S.D. |
7.126 |
9.692 |
10.421 |
9.719 |
13.503 |
12.603 |
11.752 |
Table 3: Summary of Clinical Chemistry of Males; Values with meaningful changes
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Hematology of Males; n = 5 |
||
CK [U/L]] |
AST [U/L] |
ALT [U/L] |
||
For animals sacrificed after treatment |
||||
0 |
Mean |
291 |
98 |
34 |
S.D. |
59 |
9 |
7 |
|
100 |
Mean |
336 |
100 |
37 |
S.D. |
88 |
6 |
6 |
|
300 |
Mean |
423 |
101 |
37 |
S.D. |
130 |
10 |
5 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
452* |
120* |
92* |
S.D. |
52 |
15 |
26 |
|
For animals sacrificed after treatment and recovery |
||||
0 |
Mean |
268 |
104 |
46 |
|
S.D. |
32 |
20 |
7 |
1000 |
Mean |
319 |
95 |
35* |
|
S.D. |
66 |
12 |
4 |
Table 4: Summary of Clinical Chemistry of Females; Values with meaningful changes
Doses [mg/kg /day] |
|
Hematology of Females; n = 5 |
||
CK [U/L]] |
AST [U/L] |
ALT [U/L] |
||
For animals sacrificed after treatment |
||||
0 |
Mean |
310 |
98 |
23 |
S.D. |
30 |
13 |
4 |
|
100 |
Mean |
340 |
100 |
29 |
S.D. |
93 |
10 |
4 |
|
300 |
Mean |
323 |
103 |
40* |
S.D. |
40 |
13 |
12 |
|
1000 |
Mean |
514* |
118 |
77* |
S.D. |
221 |
16 |
28 |
|
For animals sacrificed after treatment and recovery |
||||
0 |
Mean |
270 |
94 |
34 |
|
S.D. |
76 |
7 |
7 |
1000 |
Mean |
258 |
107 |
28 |
|
S.D. |
54 |
35 |
4 |
Table 5: Histopathology
Sex |
MALES |
FEMALES |
||||||||||
Group |
After treatment |
After treatment and recovery |
After treatment |
After treatment and recovery |
||||||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
600 |
0 |
600 |
0 |
100 |
300 |
600 |
0 |
600 |
No. of rats |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
STOMACH; |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
(5) |
Epithelial hyperplasia-non glandular |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
minimal |
— |
— |
1 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
mild |
— |
— |
— |
2 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
1 |
— |
— |
moderate |
— |
— |
— |
2 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
4 |
— |
— |
Erosion-non glandular |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
minimal |
— |
— |
1 |
3 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
4 |
— |
— |
Oedema; non glandular; submucosa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
minimal |
— |
— |
1 |
1 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
3 |
— |
— |
mild |
— |
— |
— |
2 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2 |
— |
— |
moderate |
— |
— |
— |
1 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The repeated dose toxicity of the registration substance was investigated according to the Guideline OECD 407.The animals treated at dose of 600 mg/kg bw/day exhibited changes in clinical chemistry (AST, ALT in males and females). In stomach, focal to multifocal thickening of non glandular mucosa was found that was associated with epithelial hyperplasia, erosion and oedema. The NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/day was obtained.
- Executive summary:
The repeated dose toxicity of the registration substance 1-Propanaminium, 3-amino-N-(carboxymethyl)-N,N-dimethyl-, N-C18(unsatd) acyl derivs., hydroxides, inner salt (C18unsat-AAPB) was investigated according to the Guideline OECD 407.
Five male and five female rats per dose group were treated per gavage once daily for 28 days at doses of 0, 100, 300 and 600 mg/kg bw/day. These animals were sacrificed on day 29.In addition, five male and five female rats were treated in the same manner at doses of 0 and 600 mg/kg bw/day and allowed to recover for 14 days.
No effect was found for animals treated at 100 and 300 mg/kg bw.
The animals treated at dose of 600 mg/kg bw/day exhibited changes in clinical chemistry (AST, ALT and CK in males and females). In stomach, focal to multifocal thickening of non glandular mucosa was found that was associated with epithelial hyperplasia, erosion and oedema.
The NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/day was obtained.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.