Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15 February 2014 to 17 September 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted 21 July 1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reaction products of N-(2-aminoethyl)-Ń-{2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethyl}ethane-1,2-diamine,N-(2-aminoethyl)-Ń–[2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethyl]ethane-1,2-diamine,N-{2-[4-(2-aminoethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethyl}ethane-1,2-diamine,N,N,Ń-tris(2-aminoethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine,carbon disulphide and sodium hydroxide.
IUPAC Name:
Reaction products of N-(2-aminoethyl)-Ń-{2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethyl}ethane-1,2-diamine,N-(2-aminoethyl)-Ń–[2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethyl]ethane-1,2-diamine,N-{2-[4-(2-aminoethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethyl}ethane-1,2-diamine,N,N,Ń-tris(2-aminoethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine,carbon disulphide and sodium hydroxide.
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Reaction product of tetraethylene pentamine, carbon disulphide and sodium hydroxide
Cas Number:
2365035-33-0
IUPAC Name:
Reaction product of tetraethylene pentamine, carbon disulphide and sodium hydroxide
Test material form:
other: Liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Reaction products of N-(2-aminoethyl)-Ń-{2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethyl}ethane-1,2-diamine,N-(2-aminoethyl)-Ń–[2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethyl]ethane-1,2-diamine,N-{2-[4-(2-aminoethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethyl}ethane-1,2-diamine,N,N,Ń-tris(2-aminoethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine,carbon disulphide and sodium hydroxide. (Epofloc L-1R).
- Substance type: Industrial Chemical
- Physical state: Brown Liquid
- Analytical purity: 40.5%
- Lot/batch No.: 311045D
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 22 November 2014
- Storage Temperature: Ambient temperature (in original container) indoor in dry and well-ventilated area.

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix (induced using Aroclor 1254)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Cytotoxicity Test: 156.25, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/mL in the absence and presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation
- Mutagenicity Test (2 independent experiments in the absence and presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation: Trial 1: 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/ml, Trial 2 (confirmation test): 500, 1000, 2000 4000 and 5000 μg/ml.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Sterile distilled water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Epofloc L-1R was soluble in sterile distilled water at 500 mg/mL.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
Sterile Distilled Water
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
no
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
ethylmethanesulphonate
Remarks:
Ethyl Methanesulfonate (0.4 µL/mL final concentration in the absence of metabolic activation); Benzo(a)pyrene (6 µL/mL final concentration in the presence of metabolic activation).
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: In medium

DURATION
- Preincubation period: approximately 24 hours prior to treatment
- Exposure duration: Mutagenicity Test Trial I: 3 hours 45 minutes; Trial II: 3 hours 45 minutes, both in the absence and presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7-9 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 16 days post treatment

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 2-amino-6-mercaptopurine (6-thioguanine) at a final concentration of 5 µg/ml.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 per treatment concentration, positive and negative control.

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 10000000 cells/culture for each treatment and negative and positive controls.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Other: assessed by calculating the percent relative cloning efficiency following treatment.

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No
- Determination of endoreplication: No
Evaluation criteria:
Epofloc L-1R was considered positive if the following criteria were met:
- A concentration-related biologically significant increase in mutant frequency in comparison with concurrent negative control and the test item caused a three-fold increase (Nestmann, E.R. et al., 1991) in the number of 6-thioguanine resistant colonies relative to concurrent negative control with statistically significant increases outside the laboratory historical negative control range.
- A net increase in mutant colonies of treated cultures above the concurrent control in at least two of the concentrations tested. Negative results were confirmed by a repeat test (short duration, 3 hour 45 mins), using same experimental conditions considering the toxicity pattern achieved in the trial I mutagenicity experiment.

The analytical acceptance criteria for the concentration of the test item in the vehicle was ± 20% deviation from nominal value and CV% < 10%.
Statistics:
Weighted regression analysis was performed to evaluate the dose response relationship (Li, A.P. et al., 1987; Hsie, A.W. et al., 1981) on Epofloc-L-1R treatment groups against negative control.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Remarks:
No cytotoxicity of biological relevance at the limit concentration.
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- No significant change in pH (± 1 pH unit) or osmolality (≥ 50 mOsm/kg H2O) was observed in culture medium at any tested concentration up to 5000 μg Epofloc-L-1R/ml in the absence or presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation.
- Water solubility: Soluble in sterile distilled water at 500 mg/mL.
- Precipitation: None observed in culture medium up to 5000 μg Epofloc-L-1R/mL in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: No significant reduction/toxicity in cell count was observed at the end of treatment in cultures treated at 5000 μg/mL both in the absence (relative cloning efficiency 86.82%) and presence (relative cloning efficiency 90.58%) of metabolic activation (2% v/v final volume S9) at 5000 μg/mL, the guideline limit dose. This was therefore the highest concentration tested in the absence and presence of metabolic activation for the main study.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The absolute cloning efficiency of the CHO-K1 cell line (negative control) was above 60% in both the trials. The spontaneous mutation level (negative control) was within the acceptable limit [less than 20 per 106 clonable cells (Li, A.P. et al., 1987)] in both the trials, validating the acceptability of the test system. The increased mutant frequency in positive controls in trial I and II demonstrated the efficiency of the test system and suitability of the test procedures and conditions employed in the study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative

It is concluded that Epofloc-L-1R does not have potential to induce gene mutations at the hgprt locus of CHO-K1 cells, both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation under the present experimental conditions.