Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
No adverse effects were observed under the conditions of this study.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 February 2014 to 17 September 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 21 July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (induced using Aroclor 1254)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - Cytotoxicity Test: 156.25, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/mL in the absence and presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation
- Mutagenicity Test (2 independent experiments in the absence and presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation: Trial 1: 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/ml, Trial 2 (confirmation test): 500, 1000, 2000 4000 and 5000 μg/ml. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Sterile distilled water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Epofloc L-1R was soluble in sterile distilled water at 500 mg/mL. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Sterile Distilled Water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Ethyl Methanesulfonate (0.4 µL/mL final concentration in the absence of metabolic activation); Benzo(a)pyrene (6 µL/mL final concentration in the presence of metabolic activation).
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: In medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: approximately 24 hours prior to treatment
- Exposure duration: Mutagenicity Test Trial I: 3 hours 45 minutes; Trial II: 3 hours 45 minutes, both in the absence and presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7-9 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 16 days post treatment
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 2-amino-6-mercaptopurine (6-thioguanine) at a final concentration of 5 µg/ml.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 per treatment concentration, positive and negative control.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 10000000 cells/culture for each treatment and negative and positive controls.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Other: assessed by calculating the percent relative cloning efficiency following treatment.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No
- Determination of endoreplication: No - Evaluation criteria:
- Epofloc L-1R was considered positive if the following criteria were met:
- A concentration-related biologically significant increase in mutant frequency in comparison with concurrent negative control and the test item caused a three-fold increase (Nestmann, E.R. et al., 1991) in the number of 6-thioguanine resistant colonies relative to concurrent negative control with statistically significant increases outside the laboratory historical negative control range.
- A net increase in mutant colonies of treated cultures above the concurrent control in at least two of the concentrations tested. Negative results were confirmed by a repeat test (short duration, 3 hour 45 mins), using same experimental conditions considering the toxicity pattern achieved in the trial I mutagenicity experiment.
The analytical acceptance criteria for the concentration of the test item in the vehicle was ± 20% deviation from nominal value and CV% < 10%. - Statistics:
- Weighted regression analysis was performed to evaluate the dose response relationship (Li, A.P. et al., 1987; Hsie, A.W. et al., 1981) on Epofloc-L-1R treatment groups against negative control.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No cytotoxicity of biological relevance at the limit concentration.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- No significant change in pH (± 1 pH unit) or osmolality (≥ 50 mOsm/kg H2O) was observed in culture medium at any tested concentration up to 5000 μg Epofloc-L-1R/ml in the absence or presence (2% v/v final concentration S9) of metabolic activation.
- Water solubility: Soluble in sterile distilled water at 500 mg/mL.
- Precipitation: None observed in culture medium up to 5000 μg Epofloc-L-1R/mL in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: No significant reduction/toxicity in cell count was observed at the end of treatment in cultures treated at 5000 μg/mL both in the absence (relative cloning efficiency 86.82%) and presence (relative cloning efficiency 90.58%) of metabolic activation (2% v/v final volume S9) at 5000 μg/mL, the guideline limit dose. This was therefore the highest concentration tested in the absence and presence of metabolic activation for the main study. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
It is concluded that Epofloc-L-1R does not have potential to induce gene mutations at the hgprt locus of CHO-K1 cells, both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation under the present experimental conditions.
Reference
The absolute cloning efficiency of the CHO-K1 cell line (negative control) was above 60% in both the trials. The spontaneous mutation level (negative control) was within the acceptable limit [less than 20 per 106 clonable cells (Li, A.P. et al., 1987)] in both the trials, validating the acceptability of the test system. The increased mutant frequency in positive controls in trial I and II demonstrated the efficiency of the test system and suitability of the test procedures and conditions employed in the study.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
The OECD 476; in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test, is a very
recent study undertaken to a recognised guideline and to GLP. It is also
the most definitive of the three in vitro studies.
Justification for classification or non-classification
No adverse effects were observed under the conditions of any of the in vitro genetic studies, therefore this substance will not be classified for genetic toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.