Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: dermal

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016-11-03 to 2017-02-17
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethyl propionate
EC Number:
203-291-4
EC Name:
Ethyl propionate
Cas Number:
105-37-3
Molecular formula:
C5H10O2
IUPAC Name:
ethyl propanoate

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: Males 8 weeks old; Females 9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: Males 267.5-283.4g; Females 217.6-231.5g
- Housing: one animal per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: for four days after three days of quarantine (including health examinations)

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.1-24.6°C (measured), permissible range 19.0-25.0°C
- Humidity (%): 47.7-61-7% (measured), permissible range 30.0-70.0%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15 clean, fresh, filtered air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light/12 hours dark

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal surface
- % coverage: 5 cm x 6 cm
- Type of wrap if used: lint, Soft Cloth Tape with Liner and surgical tape

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): cotton moistened with tepid water
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2.25 mL/kg bw
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 animals per sex per dose;
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: observations for mortality, clinical signs, general conditions at 30 minutes after dosing and at 1, 2, 4, 6 hours after dosing on day 0 and once daily thereafter for 14 days; body weight was recorded prior to dosing on day 0 and on day 1, 3, 7, and on day of necropsy, day 14
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, histopathology, other: no histopathology, since no gross findings were observed at necropsy.
Statistics:
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS progam V9.3.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
All animals at 2000 mg/kg bw and in the control group survived the duration of the study. There were no effects on the mortality. (see table 1)
Clinical signs:
other: All animals at 2000 mg/kg bw and in the control group showed no abnormalities of clinical signs. (see table 2)
Gross pathology:
No gross findings were observed in any animal at 2000 mg/kg bw.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Summary of Mortality

Sex

dose (mg/kg)

No. animals

Days after dosing

mortality

 

 

 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

 

male

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/5

 

2000

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Female

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/5

 

2000

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/5

Table 2: Individual Clinical Signs

Sex

Dose (mg/kg)

No. animals

Clinical sign

Hours (day 0) after dosing

 

 

 

 

0.5

1

2

4

6

Male

0

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

 

2000

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Female

0

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

 

2000

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

Sex

Dose (mg/kg)

No. animals

Clinical sign

Days after

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Male

0

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

2000

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Female

0

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

2000

5

NOA

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

NOA: No observable abnormality

Table 3: Individual Body Weights

Sex

Dose

 

Days after dosing

Gain

 

 

 

0

3

7

14

0-14

Male

0

Mean

274.9

288.3

315.7

358.1

83.2

 

 

S.D.

3.2

1.9

6.9

12.8

12.4

 

 

N

5

5

5

5

5

 

2000

Mean

276.0

284.1

305.2

344.9

68.9

 

 

S.D.

6.8

10.2

12.1

18.9

14.1

 

 

N

5

5

5

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Female

0

Mean

225.5

228.0

237.2

248.4

22.9

 

 

S.D.

4.9

3.2

7.5

14.0

10.0

 

 

N

5

5

5

5

5

 

2000

Mean

226.3

227.6

239.2

254.4

28.2

 

 

S.D.

7.0

2.4

4.4

5.2

8.7

 

 

N

5

5

5

5

5

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the result of the acute dermal study in Sprague-dawley rats, the test substance has an LD50 value greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Executive summary:

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential toxicity and the approximate LD50 value of the test substance following a single dermal application to Sprague-Dawley rats.

 

Test groups consisted of one dose group at a dose of 2,000 mg/kg and a control group, and each group consisted of 5 males and 5 females. All animals were monitored for clinical signs and body weight changes after dosing during the 14-day observation period. They were subjected to gross necropsy at the end of the observation period.

 

There were no deaths of animals in the 2,000 mg/kg groups. No test substance-related effects were observed in clinical signs, body weight data or necropsy findings in the 2,000 mg/kg groups.

 

Based on the result of this study, the LD50 value of the test substance was considered to be greater than 2,000 mg/kg in male and female rats under the conditions of this study. Therefore, it was not classified according to CLP.