Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
secondary literature
Justification for type of information:
Data is from safety assessment reports

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Skin irritation study of the test chemical
Author:
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP)
Year:
2003
Bibliographic source:
OECD HPV Chemicals Programme, SIDS Dossier, approved at SIAM 17 (11-14 November 2003)

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Federal Register, vol.43, no 163-Tuesday, Aug.22, 1978
Principles of method if other than guideline:
To assess the dermal irritation potential of the test chemical in rabbits
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ammonium chloride
EC Number:
235-186-4
EC Name:
Ammonium chloride
Cas Number:
12125-02-9
Molecular formula:
ClH4N
IUPAC Name:
Ammonium chloride
Details on test material:
- Name of the test chemical: Ammonium chloride
- Molecular formula : NH4Cl
- Molecular weight : 53.19 g/mol
- Substance type: Inorganic
- Physical state: Solid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Details on test animal
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Rich-Glo-farms (U.S.D.A. 74-AA-29), El Campo, Texas
- Housing: The animals were housed in galvanized steel cages placed over trays lined with aspen bedding.
- Diet: Purena Complete Rabbit Chow, Lot #197C , ad libitum
- Water: City of Houston Tap Water, ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 72 - 76 degree F
- Humidity (%): Relative humidity from 40 to 60 %.
- Air changes (per hr): air conditioned rooms

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Remarks:
intact, abraded
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 gram of crystalline test chemical
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period:
48, 72 and 96 hours
Number of animals:
6
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: intact and abraded back skin
- % coverage: double layered 1 square inch gauze pad
- Type of wrap if used: polyethylene wrapper was placed over the bandages and wound around the trunk. The wrapper was secured with masking tape.

SCORING SYSTEM: The skin reactions were scored according to the method of Draize.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Abraded(12tests) : Score(2)X7,(3)X5 /0 /0
Unabraded(12tests): Score(2)X7,(3)X5 /0 /0
The test chemical was moderately irritant to skin.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 2 (irritant) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Redness was observed at all 7 sites on the abraded and intact skin of rabbits after 24 hours of exposure. Hence the test chemical was considered to be moderately irritating to skin.
Executive summary:

The dermal irritation potential of the test chemical was assessed in rabbits according to Federal Register, vol.43, no 163-Tuesday, Aug.22, 1978 Guidelines. 6 New Zealand White rabbits were used for the study. The backs of 6 rabbits were clipped free of hair in an area of about 15 X 12 square cm. The backs of the animals were divided into quadrants. The animals were abraded in a 2 square mm cross-hatch pattern on the tattoo side by drawing a lancet across the skin, being careful not to penetrate the dermis. Two-one square inch areas on each rabbit were tested. Two unabraded additional 1 square inch sites on each rabbit were also tested. 0.5 gram of crystalline test chemical were placed in a double layered 1 square inch gauze pad and affixed to the four test sites on each animal with adhesive tape. The gauze was moistened with about 1 mL of distilled-deionized water and a polyethylene wrapper was placed over the bandages and wound around the trunk. The wrapper was secured with masking tape.The animals were placed in a restraining box and replaced in their individual cages. Water was available to the animals during the test. After 24 hours the animals were released from their restraints and the bandages were removed. All bandages were stuck to the skin by the test materials but peeled away with no skin removed. The remaining test materials was brushed of the skin but was not otherwise removed.The skin reactions were scored according to the method of Draize. Redness was observed at all 7 sites on the abraded and intact skin of rabbits after 24 hours of exposure. Hence the test chemical was considered to be moderately irritating to skin.