Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The structure activity relationship of 2,2 -Dimehtylthiazolidin was investigated by using the OECD Toolbox 3.4 (released 2016). No alert for protein binding was found. It was not possible to classify the substance for DPRA Cystein/Lysine peptide depletion and Keratinocyte gene expression by the OECD Toolbox.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in chemico
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE: OECD QSAR Toolbox and Toxtree

2. MODEL (incl. version number): Toolbox Version 3.4 and Toxtree 2.6.13

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL: CC1(C)NCCS1

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
[Explain how the model fulfils the OECD principles for (Q)SAR model validation. Consider attaching the QMRF or providing a link]
- Defined endpoint:
- Unambiguous algorithm:
- Defined domain of applicability:
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity:
- Mechanistic interpretation:

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain:
- Structural and mechanistic domains:
- Similarity with analogues in the training set:
- Other considerations (as appropriate):

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
[Explain how the prediction fits the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment]
Guideline:
other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Software tool(s) used including version: QSAR Toolbox version 3.4 and Toxtree version 2.6.13
- Model(s) used: QSAR Toolbox and Toxtree
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'Cross-reference'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'Cross-reference'
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
CC1(C)NCCS1
Details on the study design:
The QSAR Toolbox is a software for grouping chemicals into categories and filling gaps in (eco)toxicity data needed for assessing the hazards of chemical. The model focuses on intrinsic properties of chemicals (mechanism or mode of action, (eco-)toxicological effects). It enables robust hazard assessment through mechanistic comparisons without testing.

Toxtree is able to estimate toxic hazards by applying plugins in a decision tree approach inclusive a profiler for protein binding alerts.
Run / experiment:
other: 1
Parameter:
other: protein binding by OASIS 1.3 and OECD
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: QSAR predicted value
Remarks:
no alert found
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
The substance is in the applicability domain of 3 out of seven profilers in the OECD Toolbox 3.4, i.e.
Protein binding by OASIS v1.3: no alert found
Protein binding by OECD: no alert found
Protein binding alterts for skin sens by OASIS: no alert found
Not possible to classify for DPRA Cystein/Lysine peptide depletion and Keratinocyte gene expression by the OECD Toolbox.
Executive summary:

The structure activity relationship of 2,2 -Dimehtylthiazolidin was investigated by using the OECD Toolbox 3.4 (released 2016). No alert for protein binding was found. It was not possible to classify the substance for DPRA Cystein/Lysine peptide depletion and Keratinocyte gene expression by the OECD Toolbox.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Justification for classification or non-classification

2,2 -Dimehtylthiazolidin was investigated by using the OECD Toolbox 3.4 (released 2016). No alert for protein binding or sensitization in general was found.