Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-795-5 | CAS number: 12738-64-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
OECD 439 in vitro SkinEhic RHETM (Reconstructed Human Epidermis) Model
OECD Guideline 437 in vitro (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-11-2 to 2017-12-12
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of substance : MIRAMER SB
α-d-Glucopyranoside, β-d-fructofuranosyl,
benzoate
Supplier : Miwon Specialty Chemical Co.,Ltd
KTR code : TS-00832
Cas No. : 12738-64-6
Lot No. : 161228BO5
Purity : 100 %
Physical description : Flake (Solid)
Storage condition : Room temperature[(1 – 30 C°)] - Test system:
- other: Reconstructed human epidermal (RHE) model
- Source species:
- human
- Justification for test system used:
- SkinEthic RHE tissue model is commonly used for in vitro skin irritation test,
- Details on test system:
- Quality assurance results for viability, barrier function and morphology were provided by manufacturer of skin (EPISKIN)
Culture condition:
Temperature 37 ± 1 °C
CO2 gas 5 ± 1 %
Humidity Under moist atmosphere
Incubator CO2 incubator (Thermo, Forma 3121)
The temperature and humidity during the test period were measured by COBEX recorder of a CO2 incubator.
Culture medium:
The culture medium used during the test period was provided by the manufacturer (EPISKIN)
Name Maintenance medium
Lot No. 17 SMM 022
Name Growth medium
Lot No. 17 SGM 033
SkinEthic RHE tissue model observation:
Before the beginning of incubation, each insert containing the RHA tissue was checked whether tissue surface were even and excess moisture were present and the seleted a tissue that was free of defects.
Tissue preparation:
Each insert containing the RHE tissue was removed from the agarose gel and transferred to the 6-well plate with 1 ml of growth medium. the plate was incubated at 37 °Cm 5% CO2 incubator for 2 hours.
Application of test substance:
18 ul or 10 ul water with 16 mg test substance was topically applied to the upper epithelial surface og the tissue with intervals of 1 minutes
Rinsing of test substances
According to the test substance application interval, treated RHE tissues was washed with PBS solution. The RHE tissue was washed 25 times (1 ml/time) to remove all residual test subtsnace and nylon mesh.
Post incubation:
Washed RHE tissue was transferred to the 6-well plate with 2 ml of groeth medium. The plate was incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 42 hours.
Cell viabilty tests were performed on cells - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- 16 mg 100% sucrose benzoate applied with an interval of 1 minute
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 42 minutes
- Number of replicates:
- 3
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- RHE model
- Value:
- 72.5
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Sucrose benzoate is not a skin irritant
- Executive summary:
This study was conducted to assess the toxic potential of skin irritation of MIRAMER SB in SkinEhic RHETM (Reconstructed Human Epidermis) Model. The test results were evaluated as follows.
The test was performed in three groups; negative control, positive control, and test substance group.
Direct dyeing and non-specific reduction of MTT were not observed on the Test substance - The absorbance value of the negative control group and the cell viability value of the positive control group were satisfied the acceptance criterion.
- The cell viability of positive control group (Group 2) was calculated as 1.6 ± 0.2 %, and for the test substance group (Group 3), test substance was calculated as 72.5 ± 4.5 %.
As a result of in vitro skin irritation test in MIRAMER SB in SkinEhic RHETM (Reconstructed Human Epidermis) Model, cell viability has exceeded the reference value of 50 %. Therefore It was considered to be a non-irritant substance corresponding to 'No category' based on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Reference
The absorbance value of the negative control substance was 1.079. The result was within the acceptable range (0.8 ≤ OD ≥ 3.0) under the skin iiritaion test using SkinEhic RHE model.
The cell viability of the positive control group was 1.6 ± 0.2%
The cell viability of the test subtance group was 72.5 ± 4.5 %
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Nov 13th to Dec 1st 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name : MIRAMER SB
(α-d-Glucopyranoside, β-d-fructofuranosyl, benzoate)
Supplier : Miwon Specialty Chemical Co.,Ltd
KTR Code : TS-00832
Cas No. : 12738-64-6
Lot No. : 161228BO5
Purity : 100 %
Physical description : Flake (Solid)
Storage condition : Room temperature[(1 - 30)C°] - Species:
- cattle
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Bovine eyes were collected by slaughterhouse on the day of slaughter and were transported in cooling condition. The information of bovine eyes was as the following:
Supplier : Hwajung-Food (Nonsan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea)
Eyes excised date : 2017 - 11 - 16
Transfer condition : Cold (3.0 – 5.0) ℃
Number of arrived Eyes : 15 ea
Number of used cornea : 12 ea (3 ea/group) - Vehicle:
- other: mineral oil
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 20%
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The corneas were incubated in the presence of either the test substance, positive control, solvent control or negative control for 4 hours at (32 ± 1 C°) in an incubator.
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 90 ± 5 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 in each group (G1 : Negative control, G2 : Positive control, G3 : Solvent control, G4 : Test substance)
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
The eyes, once they arrived at the laboratory, were grossly examined for damage (e.g., increased opacity, scratches, neovascularization and pigmentation) and those exhibiting defects were discarded in the laboratory. Corneas with a horizontal diameter ≥ 27.5 and ≤ 28.5 using vernier calipers (KG-EQM-429) was used in selected eyes.
Isolation of corneas : Selected eyes were stored in a dish containing 1X HBSS (containing penicillin/streptomycin solution) until all corneas were dissected. The cornea was dissected from eyes such that approximately 2 to 3 mm of sclera was present around the cornea. The isolated corneas were also re-stored in a dish containing 1X HBSS (containing penicillin/streptomycin solution) until all corneas were dissected.
The isolated corneas were mounted immediately in the corneal holders and then corneal holders were filled with cMEM (without phenol red). The holders were pre-incubated for 1 hour at (32 ± 1)℃ in an incubator
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
3
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED
Name : Sodium Chloride 0.9% solution
Manufacturer : Sigma-Aldrich Corporation
Lot. No. : RNBD7305
Justification for selection : This negative control was recommended as guidelinesand used as negative control in BCOP assay widely.
SOLVENT CONTROL USED
Name : Mineral oil
Manufacturer : Sigma-Aldrich Corporation
Lot. No. : MKCB0402V
Justification for selection : Test substance had insolubility in water. Mineral oil had no adverse effects on the bovine cornea in solvent test. So mineral oil was used as solvent with the sponsor`s consent.
POSITIVE CONTROL USED
Name : Imidazole
Manufacturer : Sigma-Aldrich Corporation
Lot. No. : SLBH9399V
Justification for selection : This positive control was recommended as guidelines in case of non-surfactant solid test substances.
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
The corneas were incubated in the presence of either the test substance, positive control, solvent control or negative control for 4 hours at (32 ± 1)C° in an incubator.
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: After 4 hours of exposure time, the negative control, solvent control, positive control and test substance were removed. The corneas were washed more than three times with cMEM (with phenol red). The corneas were then given a final rinse with cMEM (without phenol red) and replaced with cMEM (without phenol red) in anterior and posterior chamber of holder.
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: The corneas were incubated for 90 ± 5 minutes at (32 ± 1)C° in an incubator.
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Final opacity unit was calculated according to the following formula: (I0/I-0.9894)/0.0251 where I0 is the illuminance(lux) through the reference holder, and I is the illuminance through the cornea holder
- Corneal permeability: At the end of the 90 ± 5 minutes incubation, the medium was collected from the posterior chamber of holder on a per cornea basis. Absorbance value of medium at 490 nm was measured using 96-well microtiter plate reader (KG-EQM-412). The medium volume in the 96 well plate was 300 uL/well and each media were filled in 3 wells in the 96 well plate. cMEM (without phenol red) was used as Blank.
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Value:
- <= 3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on the observed results it was concluded, that MIRAMER SB was considered as a ‘UN GHS Category : No Category’ in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and PermeabilityTest (BCOP Test) under the test conditions chosen. The test subtsance Miramer SB (sucrose benzoate) is therefore not irritating to the eye.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential ocular irritancy/toxicity of a test substance MIRAMER SB as measured by the MIRAMER SB’s effect to induced opacity and permeability to fluorescein in an isolated bovine cornea. The test substance was administered to the test system as a 20 % solution (w/v in mineral oil) according to the OECD guideline. Mineral oil as solvent was selected by sponsor’s consent. The test results were as in the following: - Corneal opacity was measured quantitatively as the amount of light transmission through the cornea. The mean opacity value of test substance group was 0.8 ± 1.0 (opacity unit). The mean opacity value of negative control, solvent control and positive control were –0.3 ± 1.2, 0.5 ± 0.5 and 56.6 ± 11.9 respectively. The mean opacity value of the test substance relative to the solvent control group was 0.4 ± 1.2. - Permeability was measured quantitatively as the amount of sodium fluorescein dye that passes across the full thickness of the cornea by optical density. The mean OD490 value of test substance group was 0.013 ± 0.002. The mean OD490 value of negative control, solvent control and positive control were 0.005 ± 0.001, 0.011 ± 0.006 and 1.774 ± 0.428 respectively. The mean OD490 value of test substance relative to the solvent control group was 0.002 ± 0.002. - Both opacity and permeability were used to calculate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) of the test substance relative to the negative control corneas. As a result of calculating the IVIS, test substance group was calculated as 1.0 ± 1.0. The IVIS of negative control, solvent control and positive control were –0.2 ± 1.2, 0.6 ± 0.6 and 83.2 ± 9.0 respectively. The IVIS of the test substance relative to the solvent control was 0.4 ± 1.0. The test result was considered acceptable that the IVIS of positive control falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean.
Based on the observed results it was concluded, that MIRAMER SB was considered as a ‘UN GHS Category : No Category’ in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and PermeabilityTest (BCOP Test) under the test conditions chosen. The test subtsance Miramer SB (sucrose benzoate)is therefore not irritating to the eye.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation:
As a result of in vitro skin irritation test in SkinEhic RHETM (Reconstructed Human Epidermis) Model a cell viability of
72.5 ± 4.5 % was obtained for sucrose benzoate which
exceeded the reference value for classification of 50 %. Therefore, sucrose benzoate is considered to be a non-irritant substance corresponding to 'No category' based on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Eye irritation:
As a result of calculating the IVIS, test substance group was calculated as 1.0 ± 1.0. The IVIS of negative control, solvent control and positive control were –0.2 ± 1.2, 0.6 ± 0.6 and 83.2 ± 9.0 respectively. The IVIS of the test substance relative to the solvent control was 0.4 ± 1.0. This is below the cut-off value of 3 for classification as an eye irritant, thus no classification should apply for sucrose benzoate.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.