Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
16 Aug 2017 - 17 Aug 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
26 July 2013
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Pentanedioic acid, lithium salt (1:2)
EC Number:
608-319-2
Cas Number:
29126-51-0
Molecular formula:
C5H8O4.2Li
IUPAC Name:
Pentanedioic acid, lithium salt (1:2)
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
White powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Dilithium Glutarate CAS 29126-51-0 Lot # 16-41779 in white powder form diluted in 0.9% saline

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: Isolated Bovine Cornea
Strain:
other: not applicable
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
The bovine eyes, in a Hanks’ Balance Salt Solution (HBSS) with penicillin-streptomycin, were received from Spear Products on 17 Aug 2017 and transported to MB Research in a refrigerated container.

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Remarks:
0.9% Sodium Chloride Irrigation
Controls:
yes, concurrent vehicle
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.75 ml of the 20% (w/v) test article formulation in saline
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours (+/- 10 minutes) at 32 (+/-1)°C
Observation period (in vivo):
N/A
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
None
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Three bovine corneas per group
Details on study design:
SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS: The eyes were examined prior to use on the day of dosing. Any eye with a cornea exhibiting evidence of
vascularization, pigmentation, opacity, or scratches was discarded. Corneas from eyes that were free of defects were dissected from the surrounding tissues. A 2-3 mm rim of sclera was left attached to each cornea. The corneas were then placed in a container of fresh HBSS.

QUALITY CHECK OF ISOLATED CORNEAS: A pre-exposure determination of opacity was made for each cornea by measuring each against the blank
supplied by the opacitometer. Any cornea with a value greater than 7 units was discarded.

NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3 isolated bovine corneas per group

NEGATIVE CONTROL USED: Modified Eagles Medium (MEM)

SOLVENT CONTROL USED (if applicable): 0.9% Saline

POSITIVE CONTROL USED: 20% (w/v) imidazole formulation in 0.9% saline

APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME: A volume of 0.75 ml of the 20% (w/v) test article formulation in 0.9% saline for four hours (±10 minutes). All holders and corneas were placed in a horizontal position (anterior side up) in the 32 (±1)°C incubator

TREATMENT METHOD: All corneas were dosed via the closed-chamber method.

POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: no

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: Test article formulation, 20% imidazole formulation, MEM or 0.9% saline was removed from the epithelium of the cornea and anterior chamber of the holder by washing with MEM solution containing phenol red. A final rinse was made with MEM without phenol red. The anterior and posterior chambers of the holders were then refilled with fresh MEM solution.
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION:

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Differences in light transmission through the control and treated cornea were determined using an OP-KIT opacitometer produced by Electro-Design Corporation of Riom, France. Each treated cornea will be scored in comparison to the blanks provided with the OP-KIT opacitometer .
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490) Milton Roy/ Spectronic 20-D Colorimeter Model: 333175 Serial No: 33241700
- Others (e.g, pertinent visual observations, histopathology): none

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)

DECISION CRITERIA: The decision criteria as indicated in the TG was used

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Value:
2.67
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
In vitro irritation score (IVIS) calculated from opacity score
Value:
2.75
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The mean corneal opacity, and in-vitro irritation score for Dilithium glutarate were 2.67 and 2.75 respectively. These findings do not warrant classification of Dilithium glutarate as a substance inducing serious eye damage (Category 1 Eye Irritant) under the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification, labeling, and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP).
Executive summary:

Dilithium glutarate (neat) was applied to isolated bovine cornea to assess for the potential to induce serious eye damage and irritation. Ocular damage was assessed at 4 hours post-instillation and scored through measurement of corneal opacity and permeability. The mean corneal opacity, and in-vitro irritation score for Dilithium glutarate were 2.67 and 2.75 respectively. These findings do not warrant classification of Dilithium glutarate as a Category 1 eye irritant under the Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification, labeling, and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP).