Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-736-6 | CAS number: 540-10-3
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 26 - 31 May 1999
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The analytical purity of the test substance was not specified.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Isooctadecyl palmitate
- EC Number:
- 276-719-0
- EC Name:
- Isooctadecyl palmitate
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ESD (Chatillon sur Chalaronne, France)
- Weight at study initiation: 2-2.5 kg
- Housing: animals were housed individually in high impact polystyrene cages with a mesh floor
- Diet: Food ref. 112 (U.A.R., Epinay sur Orge, France)
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-22
- Humidity (%): 30-80
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 26 May 1999 To: 31 May 1999
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: the untreated eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single application without washing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h, and 7 days - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): the treated eye was not washed
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: After instilling 2% fluorescein into the eyes, any damage was assessed with a UV-lamp
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean after 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean after 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3
- Time point:
- other: mean after 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean after 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- At the 1-hour reading time point, 3/3 rabbits had slight-moderate conjunctivae (scores 1, 1, 2) and 2/3 slight chemosis (scores 0, 1, 1). The chemosis had cleared by the 24-hour reading time point, while 3/3 animals still had slight conjunctivae (scores 1, 1, 1). All eye irritation effects were fully reversible within 48 hours.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Eye irritation score
Rabbit #
|
Time [h]
|
conjunctivae
|
iris
|
cornea
|
|
redness |
chemosis |
||||
1
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
48 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
72 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
average |
0.33 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
2
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
48 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
72 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
average |
0.33 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
3
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
48 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
72 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
average |
0.33 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
