Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
not specified
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study is older than 12 years

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Disodium 1-amino-4-[[3-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-2-methyl-5-sulphonatophenyl]amino]-9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxoanthracene-2-sulphonate
EC Number:
276-374-6
EC Name:
Disodium 1-amino-4-[[3-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-2-methyl-5-sulphonatophenyl]amino]-9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxoanthracene-2-sulphonate
Cas Number:
72139-17-4
Molecular formula:
C25H16ClF2N5O8S2.2Na
IUPAC Name:
disodium 1-amino-4-({3-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoropyrimidin-4-yl)amino]-2-methyl-5-sulfophenyl}amino)-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonate
Test material form:
solid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Diet (ad libitum): Altromin® 3020 - Haltungsdiat fUr Meerschweinchen, Hersteller: Altromin GmbH, Lage
- Water (ad libitum): tap water

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.1 mL of a 5 % suspension/application
see details on study design
Day(s)/duration:
single application
Adequacy of induction:
other: based on pre-test
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.5 mL of a 50 % suspension
see details on study design
Day(s)/duration:
single application, one week after intradermal induction for 48 h
Adequacy of induction:
non-irritant substance, but skin pre-treated with 10% SDS
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.5 mL of a 50 % suspension
Day(s)/duration:
Day 22 for 24 h
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
20 test animals, plus two control groups (10 animals each)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
missing in study report

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Intradermal application
- No. of exposures: 1
- Test groups:
Three pairs of intradermal injections of 0.1 ml volume were given in the shoulder region so that one of each pair lies on each side of the midline.
Injection 1 (cranial): a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/ physiological saline
Injection 2 (medial): 5% suspension of the test material in physiological saline
Injection 3 (caudal): 5% suspension of the test material formulated in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/ physiological saline.
- Control group:
Three pairs of intradermal injections of 0.1 ml volume were given in the shoulder region so that one of each pair lies on each side of the midline.
Injection 1 (cranial): a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/ physiological saline
Injection 2 (medial): physiological saline
Injection 3 (caudal): physiological saline in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/ physiological saline.
- Frequency of applications: 1

Epicutaneous application
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: 48 h
One day before exposure, the application sides have been clipped and painted with 0.5 mL of 10% sodium lauryl sulphate in parafine oil . A hypoallergenic band-aid (2x4 cm) impregnated with 0.5 ml the test suspension (50 % test material in physiological saline (test group) or physiological saline (control)) was put on the injection sides of the intradermal application, covered with aluminium foil and fixed for 48 h using a Fermoflex tape (Transatlantic GmbH, Schwarzenbach). At the end of the exposure period the substance was removed using physiological saline.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 21 days after intradermal induction
- Exposure period: 24 h
One day before exposure, the application sides have been clipped. Two hypoallergenic band-aids (2x4 cm) impregnated with 0.5 ml the test suspension (50 % test material in physioloigical saline) was applied to the left flank of all animals (test and control group) and fixed for 24 h using a Fermoflex tape (Transatlantic GmbH, Schwarzenbach). A control band-aids impregnated with 0.5 mL physiological saline was applied to right flank of each animal in the same manor. At the end of the application sides have been chemically depilated using Pilca-Crème (Olivin GmbH, Hamburg).
- Concentration: 50 %
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 48 and 72 h
- Scoring: The skin reaction have been scored according to Draize.

OTHER:
The body weight of all animals was recorded one day before study inition and on the las day of the study.
Challenge controls:
10 animals previously treated with the vehicle were challenged together with the test group using the same test article concentration as used for the test group.
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
n.a.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
19
Clinical observations:
one animal died during the test
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
19
Clinical observations:
one animal died during the test
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no clinical signs observed
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no clinical signs observed
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
19
Clinical observations:
one animal died during test
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
19
Clinical observations:
one animal died during test
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no clinical signs observed
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no clinical signs observed
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
other: not stated in the study report

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results of the main test

Clinical observations:
No clinical signs were observed in any animal during the study, but 2 and 3 days following the 2. induction all animals of the test group had red-coloured ears. One animal of the test groups died on day 2. Necropsy revealed a blood filled thorax and a pale liver. The body weight development of the remaining animals corresponded to the control group.

The individual erythema and edema scores after the challenge are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Individual results of the 1. Challenge

Animal Nr.  Test material concentration
Erythema/Edema Score
0% 50%
48 h 72 h 48 h 72 h
Control group
1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
3 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
4 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
5 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
6 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
7 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
8 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
9 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
10 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Test group
21 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
22 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
23 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
24 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
25 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
26 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
27 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
28 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
29 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
30 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
31 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
32 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
33 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
34 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
35 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
36 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
37 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
38 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
39 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
40 + + + +

+ animal died during study period

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In this study, conducted according to OECD 406, the test material can be considered as no dermal sensitiser.
Executive summary:

In a dermal sensitization study conducted according to OECD 406 with a suspension of the test material in physiological saline, male guinea pigs were tested using the Guinea Pig Maximisation Test according to Magnusson and Kligman. Intradermal application was performed using a 5 % suspension of the test material. Epicutaneous induction was performed occlusive with a 50 % suspension for 48 h. The challenge was conducted with a 50 % suspensions of the test material for 24 h 21 days after the intradermal induction. Skin reaction was scored according to Draize. The application sides have been examined 48 and 72 h following application. No clinical sign or sign of sensitisation ware observed throughout the study, but the ears of all test group animals were coloured red 2 and 3 days after the epicutaneous application. One animal died on day two of the study. The body weight of the remaining animals developed correspondingly to the control group. Based on the results obtained in this study, the test material can be considered as not dermal sensitising.