Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

In an bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test), 5 different bacteria strains (S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and E.coli WP2 uvrA) were incubated with doses up to 5000 µg/plate of the test item, with or without metabolic activation (S9 mix) according to OECD Guideline 471 (reference 7.6.1 -1). No significant increase in the numbers of revertant colonies was recorded. The test substance was found to be non-mutagenic under test conditions.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017-03-07 to 2017-05-22
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Specific details on test material used for the study:
OTHER SPECIFICS: white powder
Target gene:
his/trp
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Remarks:
uvrA
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix, male Wistar rat pretreated with beta-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The test material concentrations used were selected according to the EEC, OECD and Japanese guidelines for this test system.
A maximum concentration of 5000 µg/plate was selected, in order that initial treatments were performed up to the maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines (OECD TG 471, 1997).
1st series: 5.0, 15.8, 50.0, 158, 500, 1580, 5000 µg/plate, 10% S9 mix
2nd series: 50.0, 158, 500, 1580, 5000 µg/plate, 20% S9 mix
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of vehicle: Comparing the standard solvents for this assay indicated that the test substance showed best solubility performance in ultra-pure water. Based on these preliminary data, ultra-pure water was selected as vehicle for the current experiment.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: Dauromycin
Remarks:
1.0 µg/plate, TA98, wihthout S9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
2.0 µg/plate, TA100, TA1535, without S9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
50.0 µg/plate, TA1537, without S9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
Remarks:
2.0 µg/plate, E. coli, without S9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
2.0, 5.0, 10.0 µg/plate, all strains, with S9 mix
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 2 - 3 days at 36 - 38 °C

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):
Commercially available Minimal-Glucose-Agar plates (Art. 146690, Charge 143118, Merck Life Science, 69214 Eppelheim, Germany) were used for all strains.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
Evaluation criteria:
The assessment of test material-induced effects is dependent on the number of spontaneous re-vertants of each bacteria strain (solvent controls) and the increase in the number of revertants at the test material concentration which shows the highest number of colonies. The following criteria, based upon the historical controls of the laboratory and statistical considerations, are established (see "Any other information on materials and methods").
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Table 2: Summary 1st series

Metabolic activation

Test Material

Concentration [µg/plate]

Revertants per plate (Mean± SD)

TA98

TA100

TA1535

TA1537

E. coli

Without S9 mix

H2O

 

37± 10

124± 10

24± 4

8± 3

33± 7

Test Substance

5.0

36± 2

106± 10

23± 2

7± 1

37± 1

15.8

35± 3

115± 11

22± 7

6± 3

38± 6

50.0

29± 12

21± 4

22± 6

8± 2

44± 3

158

38± 3

117± 13

19± 10

7± 2

37± 13

500

29± 7

102± 11

26± 3

11± 7

41± 6

1580

31± 4

105± 6

21± 8

12± 6

34± 9

5000

26± 12

121± 6

22± 4

7± 1

 

DAUN

1.0

186± 8

 

 

 

 

NaN3

2.0

 

1470± 72

819± 22

 

 

9-AA

50.0

 

 

 

561± 221

 

NQO

2.0

 

 

 

 

1566± 53

With S9 mix

H2O

 

44± 7

132± 8

22± 4

7± 1

35± 5

Test Substance

5.0

40± 7

120± 19

25± 5

5± 4

37± 4

15.8

36± 1

135± 12

18± 2

7± 1

42± 3

50.0

39± 6

149± 14

22± 3

10± 4

49± 10

158

37± 2

127± 9

17± 3

10±4

41± 2

500

46± 5

118± 9

25± 5

11± 4

38± 5

1580

36± 4

132± 21

21± 4

12± 6

40± 12

5000

46± 11

130± 16

21± 9

10± 2

42± 2

2-AA

2.0

741± 59

1014± 140

 

 

 

2-AA

5.0

 

 

196± 31

442± 25

 

2-AA

10.0

 

 

 

 

373± 64

NaN3, Sodium azide

2 -AA, 2-Aminoanthracane

9 -AA, 9-Aminoacridine

DAUN, Daunomycin

NQO, 4-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide

Table 3: Summary 2nd series

Metabolic activation

Test Material

Concentration [µg/plate]

Revertants per plate (Mean± SD)

TA98

TA100

TA1535

TA1537

E. coli

Without S9 mix

H2O

 

40± 7

145± 15

35± 5

7± 3

34± 9

Test Substance

50.0

47± 9

158± 12

37± 7

5± 1

28± 5

158

39± 6

164± 34

37± 11

7± 2

36± 8

500

30± 2

150± 16

34± 1

7± 3

34± 3

1580

40± 8

134± 14

30± 2

6± 1

35± 9

5000

45± 7

163± 27

31± 5

8± 2

42± 3

DAUN

1.0

379± 89

 

 

 

 

NaN3

2.0

 

1731± 42

1048± 45

 

 

9-AA

50.0

 

 

 

565± 109

 

NQO

2.0

 

 

 

 

1960± 25

With S9 mix

H2O

 

58± 11

131± 14

24± 9

9± 3

40± 10

Test Substance

50.0

51± 14

155± 18

28± 5

9± 1

43± 6

158

47± 12

141± 4

20± 6

8± 2

33± 4

500

57± 3

141± 4

29± 6

5± 2

40± 4

1580

55± 14

131± 13

27± 5

10± 4

36± 6

5000

42± 4

133± 5

20± 3

9± 2

38± 8

2-AA

2.0

362± 13

598± 16

 

 

 

2-AA

5.0

 

 

188± 24

126± 28

 

2-AA

10.0

 

 

 

 

192± 4

NaN3, Sodium azide

2 -AA, 2-Aminoanthracane

9 -AA, 9-Aminoacridine

DAUN, Daunomycin

NQO, 4-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide

Conclusions:
In an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) according to OECD Guideline 471 with and with out metabolic activation (S9 mix), the test substance showed no mutagenic potential.
Executive summary:

The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium test strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA according to OECD Guideline 471 (reference 7.6.1 -1). The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from rats pretreated with beta-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. The S9 mix used contained 10% S9 in the 1st and 20% S9 in the 2nd series, respectively. Treatments of all test strains were performed using the test item prepared in ultra-pure water in the absence and in the presence of S9 mix, using final concentrations of 5.0, 15.8, 50.0, 158, 500, 1580, and 5000 µg/plate, plus vehicle and positive controls. Solvent and positive control treatments were included and valid for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies all fell within acceptable ranges for solvent control treatments, and were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used. Following treatment of all bacteria test strains with the test substance in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertant numbers were observed.Furthermore, it was assumed, that the anhydrate form has the same mutagenic potential and thus the result of the test item is also applicable.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium test strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA according to OECD Guideline 471 (reference 7.6.1 -1). The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from rats pretreated with beta-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. The S9 mix used contained 10% S9 in the 1st and 20% S9 in the 2nd series, respectively. Treatments of all test strains were performed using the test item prepared in ultra-pure water in the absence and in the presence of S9 mix, using final concentrations of 5.0, 15.8, 50.0, 158, 500, 1580, and 5000 µg/plate, plus vehicle and positive controls. Solvent and positive control treatments were included and valid for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies all fell within acceptable ranges for solvent control treatments, and were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used. Following treatment of all bacteria test strains with the test substance in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertant numbers were observed. Furthermore, it was assumed, that the anhydrate form has the same mutagenic potential and thus the result of the test item is also applicable.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. In vitro results with the test substance were negative. As a result the test substance is not considered to be classified for genetic toxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.